| 1 |
♠AT2
♥96
♦A3
♣KQ9854
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 1.00 3N N -3 ♥Q 3-Owens-Bailey vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ N -3 ♦Q 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 1-Frank-Kelly
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ N -3 ♦Q 4-Gassman-Xu vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
|
| 2 |
♠53
♥T42
♦A983
♣Q842
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N W +2 ♣2 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 1-Frank-Kelly
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥5 4-Gassman-Xu vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
460 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦9 3-Owens-Bailey vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
|
| 3 |
♠7
♥T974
♦AQ743
♣632
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♦9 4-Gassman-Xu vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♣T 3-Owens-Bailey vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣4 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 1-Frank-Kelly
|
| 4 |
♠Q95
♥QT6542
♦85
♣A8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2/3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♥3 4-Gassman-Xu vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
100 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♦4 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 1-Frank-Kelly
180 0.00 2.00 2N E +2 ♣Q 3-Owens-Bailey vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
|
| 5 |
♠K3
♥AKT852
♦7
♣8742
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♣3 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♣9 4-Gassman-Xu vs 1-Frank-Kelly
400 0.00 2.00 2N N -4 ♦6 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 6 |
♠A732
♥A542
♦KT6
♣A5
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 2♣ E +3 ♠4 4-Gassman-Xu vs 1-Frank-Kelly
150 1.50 0.50 2♣ E +3 ♦9 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
1150 0.00 2.00 3N* E +2 ♠4 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 7 |
♠T532
♥T2
♦KJT2
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N S ♥5 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
600 1.50 0.50 3N S ♣5 4-Gassman-Xu vs 1-Frank-Kelly
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠7 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
|
| 8 |
♠AJ72
♥6
♦KJT862
♣63
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣Q 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣Q 4-Gassman-Xu vs 1-Frank-Kelly
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♣5 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 9 |
♠6543
♥AQJ974
♦A
♣J2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠5/3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠2 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 1-Frank-Kelly
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♦6 3-Owens-Bailey vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦4 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 10 |
♠8
♥7542
♦Q982
♣AKQ4
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ -/1NT
♣6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♥8 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
100 1.00 1.00 2♣ N -1 ♠Q 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 1-Frank-Kelly
120 0.00 2.00 2N W ♣K 3-Owens-Bailey vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
|
| 11 |
♠K63
♥KT943
♦Q64
♣T5
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ E ♥5 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 1-Frank-Kelly
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♦J 3-Owens-Bailey vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♣9 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 12 |
♠643
♥A863
♦K42
♣T85
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2/1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♠5 3-Owens-Bailey vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
50 0.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦3 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
50 0.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦2 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 1-Frank-Kelly
|
| 13 |
♠K5
♥QJ962
♦7643
♣T7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♥6 3-Owens-Bailey vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥Q 4-Gassman-Xu vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥6 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
|
| 14 |
♠A3
♥J9
♦AKT82
♣AT82
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♦3 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
50 1.50 0.50 1♠ E -1 ♥8 3-Owens-Bailey vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -3 ♥T 4-Gassman-Xu vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
|
| 15 |
♠T75
♥KQT95
♦J62
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N E ♣J 3-Owens-Bailey vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
180 1.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♥9 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
800 0.00 2.00 3♥* N -3 ♠A 4-Gassman-Xu vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
|
| 16 |
♠AJ85
♥J5
♦54
♣Q8764
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥T 4-Gassman-Xu vs 4-Ruggeri-Stone
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥T 2-Shoemaker-Clark vs 3-Russak-GUMZ
120 0.00 2.00 2N E ♦2 3-Owens-Bailey vs 2-Buhr-Swanson
|