1 |
♠QJT8
♥762
♦QJ
♣K872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N W ♠Q 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣6 2-Johnson-Miller vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ E +2 ♣6 5-Martin-Boggs vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
|
2 |
♠QJ63
♥AT64
♦AKT
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 5♠* E -3 ♣A 5-Martin-Boggs vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
50 0.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 2-Johnson-Miller vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣A 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
3 |
♠AKJ74
♥JT84
♦J
♣643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♦ S -2 ♥A 2-Johnson-Miller vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
150 0.50 1.50 2♦ S -3 ♥A 5-Martin-Boggs vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
150 0.50 1.50 2♦ S -3 ♥A 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
4 |
♠AQJ954
♥A4
♦7
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +3 ♥9 2-Johnson-Miller vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +3 ♥9 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♥9 5-Martin-Boggs vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
|
5 |
♠9853
♥643
♦QT84
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♥6 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 2-Johnson-Miller
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ E +2 ♥A 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 7-Gamble-Walker
150 0.50 1.50 2♣ E +3 ♥A 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
6 |
♠A53
♥86
♦A2
♣AQJ963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♣2 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 7-Gamble-Walker
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠2 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 2-Johnson-Miller
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ N ♦J 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
7 |
♠T862
♥AK9
♦72
♣A532
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♠3 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 2-Johnson-Miller
90 1.00 1.00 1N S ♦4 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 7-Gamble-Walker
PASS 0.00 2.00 Pass Out 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
8 |
♠J4
♥QT543
♦AK87
♣T9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♠8 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ S ♠8 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 2-Johnson-Miller
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥2 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 7-Gamble-Walker
|
9 |
♠QT
♥K742
♦QT85
♣AQJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥5 7-Gamble-Walker vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♥4 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥5 5-Martin-Boggs vs 2-Johnson-Miller
|
10 |
♠Q42
♥AQ8
♦KQ2
♣AQ95
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♠ 1/2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♣J 7-Gamble-Walker vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
90 1.00 1.00 1N N ♥3 5-Martin-Boggs vs 2-Johnson-Miller
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥6 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
|
11 |
♠T98754
♥JT973
♦T7
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 4♦ -/1♥ 4/5♠ 6NT ♣5 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ E ♣A 5-Martin-Boggs vs 2-Johnson-Miller
500 0.50 1.50 5♣* S -3 ♠K 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
500 0.50 1.50 5♣* S -3 ♦5 7-Gamble-Walker vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
12 |
♠J862
♥7
♦JT93
♣K874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣J 5-Martin-Boggs vs 2-Johnson-Miller
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣J 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣J 7-Gamble-Walker vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
13 |
♠AK8
♥543
♦AJT73
♣A9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ -/1♥ 4NT ♣4 ♥6/7 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♦K 5-Martin-Boggs vs 7-Gamble-Walker
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ S +1 ♠4 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
730 0.00 2.00 3♠* W ♦K 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 2-Johnson-Miller
|
14 |
♠98763
♥T62
♦K4
♣Q85
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 5♥ 3/2♠ 3NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 6♥ E -1 ♦K 5-Martin-Boggs vs 7-Gamble-Walker
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦K 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 2-Johnson-Miller
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦K 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
|
15 |
♠T965
♥8542
♦J3
♣863
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N E +2 ♦5 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
300 1.00 1.00 1N S -3 ♠K 5-Martin-Boggs vs 7-Gamble-Walker
400 0.00 2.00 3N E ♦5 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 2-Johnson-Miller
|
16 |
♠87
♥962
♦J93
♣KQJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♥T 5-Martin-Boggs vs 7-Gamble-Walker
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♣K 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 2-Johnson-Miller
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♣K 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
|
17 |
♠KQ875
♥Q
♦AQ
♣AKT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥2 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Boggs
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥K 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥2 7-Gamble-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
|
18 |
♠Q3
♥Q4
♦AT754
♣K972
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ E ♦3 7-Gamble-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦3 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Boggs
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♦3 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
|
19 |
♠K8
♥J963
♦AT
♣AK953
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♦2 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
460 0.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠T 7-Gamble-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
460 0.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠T 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Boggs
|
20 |
♠J32
♥K5
♦KQ743
♣A75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ W +2 ♦K 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Boggs
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦K 6-Llacera-Prochaska vs 1-Hullman-Bruno
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦K 7-Gamble-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Spencer
|
21 |
♠KJT42
♥K83
♦JT93
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ NT6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥4 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
100 0.50 1.50 1N W -2 ♠J 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Boggs
100 0.50 1.50 2♦ W -2 ♣7 7-Gamble-Walker vs 2-Johnson-Miller
|
22 |
♠63
♥AQT42
♦Q7
♣AKJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3/2♦ 6♥ 5/4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 1.50 0.50 6♥ S ♥J 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Boggs
980 1.50 0.50 6♥ S ♣7 7-Gamble-Walker vs 2-Johnson-Miller
490 0.00 2.00 4N S +2 ♣7 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
|
23 |
♠Q843
♥KT74
♦T2
♣J92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N W ♠3 7-Gamble-Walker vs 2-Johnson-Miller
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥2 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♦9 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Boggs
|
24 |
♠KT97
♥64
♦KQJT
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.75 0.25 2♥ E ♥2 1-Hullman-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Boggs
130 0.25 1.75 2♣ W +2 ♦K 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
|
25 |
♠A853
♥853
♦852
♣A83
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥1/2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ E ♠8 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 5-Martin-Boggs
680 0.50 1.50 5♥ E +1 ♦J 2-Johnson-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦J 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Walker
|
26 |
♠JT
♥AKQ
♦A652
♣QJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N ♥T 2-Johnson-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
150 1.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♥T 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Walker
120 0.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥8 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 5-Martin-Boggs
|
27 |
♠942
♥J7
♦JT74
♣AK94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 2-Johnson-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 5-Martin-Boggs
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Walker
|
28 |
♠J4
♥QJT97
♦J
♣AJ973
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣K 8-Oppenheimer-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Walker
100 0.50 1.50 5♥ N -1 ♣K 2-Johnson-Miller vs 6-Llacera-Prochaska
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♣K 4-Tainty-Spencer vs 5-Martin-Boggs
|