1 |
♠AT4
♥42
♦K732
♣J986
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠6 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E ♣A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠6 3-Modest-Miller vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
2 |
♠KQJ52
♥AQ3
♦5
♣KJ42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♥ 1♠ ♦4 ♥6/7 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 ♠T 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
400 0.50 1.50 3N W ♠K 6-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♥4 3-Modest-Miller vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
3 |
♠Q86
♥AQ
♦JT6532
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♦5 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♦5 3-Modest-Miller vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♣K 6-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
|
4 |
♠Q54
♥A94
♦Q763
♣K74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ -/3NT ♣2 ♦3 NT2/9 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 1.00 5♠ S ♣3 3-Modest-Miller vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
650 1.00 1.00 5♠ N ♦A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣J 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠KQJ975
♥AT
♦9
♣T985
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♠8 6-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♦8 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
300 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -3 ♦5 3-Modest-Miller vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠Q
♥T9
♦AT93
♣AT6542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥5 3-Modest-Miller vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♦8 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣T 6-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
7 |
♠A3
♥732
♦T32
♣AK932
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 6♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 2.00 0.00 2♥ W +4 ♣A 3-Modest-Miller vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
680 1.00 1.00 5♠ E +1 ♥T 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
1430 0.00 2.00 6♠ E ♣4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
8 |
♠QJ875
♥8764
♦KQ52
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠9 3-Modest-Miller vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.00 1.00 5♣ S +1 ♦T 6-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Walker-Dau
170 0.00 2.00 3♣ S +3 ♦T 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
|
9 |
♠AJ
♥K8432
♦K62
♣A54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♣T 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
490 1.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♣4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Walker-Dau
230 0.00 2.00 3♠ N +3 ♦8 3-Modest-Miller vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
10 |
♠AJ62
♥AT7
♦A875
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.75 0.25 3♣ W ♣6 3-Modest-Miller vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
300 0.25 1.75 2♠ N -3 ♦2 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
|
11 |
♠3
♥J83
♦AQ9432
♣Q53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ S ♠A 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Walker-Dau
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ W +2 ♦A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣3 6-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Modest-Miller
|
12 |
♠JT62
♥A9862
♦3
♣753
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 1/-♠ ♣4/3 ♦4 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ W ♣7 6-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Modest-Miller
120 1.00 1.00 2N E ♦4 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 0.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♥6 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
13 |
♠J9
♥KJT972
♦K9
♣982
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣6 6-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Modest-Miller
600 1.00 1.00 3N S ♣7 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♠A 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
14 |
♠KQ95
♥Q9
♦854
♣AK76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 6♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 ♣A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Modest-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 4♣ S -2 ♦6 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
480 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♣A 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
15 |
♠JT862
♥J97
♦T2
♣K63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Modest-Miller
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♦A 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Walker-Dau
120 0.00 2.00 2N W ♠J 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
16 |
♠Q63
♥75
♦972
♣AT873
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦4/2 ♥5/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♠ E -2 ♦A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ S ♠2 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
50 0.00 2.00 5♦ S -1 ♠2 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Modest-Miller
|
17 |
♠A32
♥KQ4
♦A972
♣Q84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 5/4♦ 3/2♥ 1/-♠ 5/4NT ♣7/6 ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠4 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
430 1.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
430 1.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠2 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Modest-Miller
|
18 |
♠AJ63
♥A7
♦862
♣KQ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N W -3 ♣4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 ♣J 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
90 0.00 2.00 1N W ♠5 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Modest-Miller
|
19 |
♠K4
♥QT95
♦T6
♣98765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3♦ W -2 ♠K 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
200 1.50 0.50 3♦ E -2 ♥A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♣A 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Modest-Miller
|
20 |
♠A764
♥T8
♦85
♣QT973
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N E ♥7 1-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Modest-Miller
600 1.50 0.50 3N E ♥4 6-Hullman-Pender vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥4 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
21 |
♠8652
♥K2
♦A85
♣KT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 1.50 0.50 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Modest-Miller
PASS 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
150 0.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♥3 6-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
22 |
♠QT54
♥J
♦J
♣JT97632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 6/1NT ♦3 ♥4/3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦9 6-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦6 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Modest-Miller
210 0.00 2.00 2N S +3 ♦9 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
|
23 |
♠962
♥T7
♦QJ62
♣7543
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣K 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Modest-Miller
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W ♥T 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♣K 6-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
24 |
♠J87
♥K2
♦K2
♣AQT842
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ E +2 ♦J 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Modest-Miller
230 1.00 1.00 1♠ E +5 ♥6 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
800 0.00 2.00 5♣* N -4 ♠A 6-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
25 |
♠AQJ5
♥QJ432
♦4
♣QT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♦ S -1 ♣6 6-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Millslagle-Wesolowski
100 1.00 1.00 2N N -2 ♣6 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Modest-Miller
250 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -5 ♣3 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Gamble-Llacera
|