1 |
♠A86
♥A9765
♦A8
♣J54
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣K 8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♥6 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
100 1.00 2.00 2♥* N -1 ♣K 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♥K 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
|
2 |
♠A3
♥J765
♦A7
♣AKT76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N N ♠2 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -4 ♣A 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
120 1.00 2.00 2N N ♠2 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 ♠K 8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
|
3 |
♠AJT7
♥KJ
♦KJ6
♣QT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6/5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥7 8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣J 2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣J 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♠4 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
|
4 |
♠AQT4
♥J87
♦AQ93
♣JT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ N +1 ♥A 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥A 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
100 0.17 2.83 2♠ S -1 ♥T 8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
|
5 |
♠76542
♥3
♦AQ743
♣T6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4/5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♥3 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♥2 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 0.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♥5 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 ♥3 8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
6 |
♠KJ82
♥T65
♦Q2
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3/2♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6/5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 ♣8 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠4 8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
790 0.00 3.00 4♥* E ♠4 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
7 |
♠Q4
♥KT8754
♦AJ
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠8 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠8 8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠3 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ N ♠8 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
8 |
♠AK73
♥AJ4
♦KJT
♣876
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 1/2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♦ W -3 ♠A 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
110 1.00 2.00 2♣ E +1 ♠J 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
150 0.00 3.00 2♣ E +3 ♠J 8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
9 |
♠QJ85
♥A2
♦QJ73
♣K52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.95 1.65 2♥ S +2 ♠9 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
140 1.65 1.95 2♥ S +1 ♥5 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
|
10 |
♠94
♥962
♦A75
♣KJ982
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♦Q 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
100 2.50 0.50 3N N -1 ♦Q 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
200 1.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♦Q 8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
300 0.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♦Q 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
11 |
♠A54
♥AK
♦Q84
♣AKT54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2/4NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
460 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦6 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠3 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
12 |
♠QJ74
♥T4
♦A42
♣J853
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥T 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥T 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
400 0.50 2.50 3N W ♠4 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
400 0.50 2.50 3N W ♠4 8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
|
13 |
♠T7
♥AK72
♦QJ
♣AQ986
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♠A 8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠Q 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♦5 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
14 |
♠J7632
♥985
♦KT
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.50 0.50 2N S +2 ♣6 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
180 2.50 0.50 2N S +2 ♣6 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ E -2 ♠A 8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
50 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥7 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
15 |
♠8
♥J42
♦AT
♣AJ96432
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 5♣ N ♠K 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
300 2.00 1.00 4♠* E -2 ♣K 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
150 1.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♠K 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ E -2 ♣K 8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
16 |
♠76
♥KJ5
♦A983
♣Q863
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♣3 8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♦5 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♣7 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
680 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦5 5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
17 |
♠AT6
♥T76
♦A87654
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♦2 8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♦2 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦2 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
50 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 ♠4 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
|
18 |
♠KJ752
♥A95
♦Q4
♣AT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦8 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♦8 8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♠9 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♦9 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
|
19 |
♠QJ43
♥4
♦K9
♣AKQT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.50 0.50 3N N ♦5 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
400 2.50 0.50 3N N ♦2 8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦6 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦9 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
|
20 |
♠A32
♥J963
♦T65
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 1.00 3N W +3 ♥5 6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
690 2.00 1.00 3N W +3 ♥3 8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
690 2.00 1.00 3N W +3 ♥2 2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
720 0.00 3.00 3N W +4 ♥3 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
21 |
♠865
♥AQT75
♦AJ
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5/6 ♠5/6 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♦8 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♣3 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
400 0.00 3.00 3N N -4 ♠7 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
22 |
♠Q5
♥A732
♦85
♣A9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
200 1.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♦8 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
200 1.50 1.50 2♠ W +3 ♦8 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
230 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +4 ♦8 8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
|
23 |
♠Q942
♥963
♦AKT43
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣K 8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
100 2.00 1.00 5♠ S -1 ♣K 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
200 0.50 2.50 5♠ S -2 ♥K 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
200 0.50 2.50 5♠ S -2 ♣K 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
|
24 |
♠AT
♥852
♦QT53
♣QT87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 6♠ W -3 ♥2 8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠K 7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦3 3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
|
25 |
♠T
♥AQ42
♦J8542
♣K85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 3.00 0.00 4♥* S ♠A 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦K 2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♦K 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ S ♦K 8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
26 |
♠A762
♥J7
♦753
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣2 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦7 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦3 8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣K 2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
|
27 |
♠732
♥K95
♦Q7652
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♥5 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
100 2.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♦5 2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
90 1.00 2.00 1N S ♠A 8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W ♣9 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
|
28 |
♠T7
♥AQ4
♦AQ8543
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♣9 1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♣A 2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♣A 8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
|