? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Bruce Dau - John Walker 62.18 1st A 0.80
Angie Millslagle - Rachael Spencer 59.67 2nd A 0.56
Charles Pender - John Hullman 59.44 3rd A 0.40
John Wesolowski - Robert Johnson 47.17 2nd C 0.28
EVENT>Friday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Friday Morn  |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>December 20, 2024  |CLUB NO.>137059    | 12/20/2024 14:44
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Ken Gamble      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/1000 |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=7/C=5                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Shirley Llacera        Jacci Sterling           C    .     .     .     36.98  44.02          
 2 John Walker            Bruce Dau                B    1     1     .     52.23  62.18  0.80(A) 
 3 Rachael Spencer        Angie Millslagle         C    2     2     1     50.12  59.67  0.56(A) 
 4 John Hullman           Charles Pender           B    3     3     .     49.93  59.44  0.40(A) 
 5 Cindy Sedey            Richard Hamlin           C    .     .     .     28.00  33.33          
 6 Ken Gamble             Ken Llacera              A    .     .     .     41.95  49.94          
 7 Robert Johnson         John Wesolowski          C    .     .     2     39.62  47.17  0.28(C) 
 8 Michael Modest         Jim Miller               C    .     .     .     39.07  46.51          
                                          Totals                         337.90       

1 ♠A86
A9765
A8
♣J54
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠974
JT432
K6
♣A73
♠KJ52
-
QJ42
♣KQT82
♠QT3
KQ8
T9753
♣96
13
812
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2  ♣4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2 N      ♣K  8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  100          2.00   1.00  2N W -2   6  2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        100    1.00   2.00  2* N -1  ♣K  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
        130    0.00   3.00  3♣ E +1   K  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
2 ♠A3
J765
A7
♣AKT76
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠KQ9876
Q2
K6
♣843
♠2
T983
J853
♣QJ92
♠JT54
AK4
QT942
♣5
16
104
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/3♣ 5 5 2♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 14 = +2
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N N      ♠2  2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
  200          2.00   1.00  3♠ W -4   ♣A  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
  120          1.00   2.00  2N N      ♠2  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
        100    0.00   3.00  4 S -1   ♠K  8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
3 ♠AJT7
KJ
KJ6
♣QT98
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠3
AQ63
97432
♣K54
♠9654
9742
AT5
♣J3
♠KQ82
T85
Q8
♣A762
15
95
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT  ♦6/5 ♥6
EW: 1 1  ♣3 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   1.00  4♠ N      7  8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  420          2.00   1.00  4♠ N      ♣J  2-Walker-Dau vs 4-Hullman-Pender
  420          2.00   1.00  4♠ N      ♣J  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
         50    0.00   3.00  4♠ N -1   ♠4  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
4 ♠AQT4
J87
AQ93
♣JT
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K5
T3
KT74
♣K9653
♠963
AK952
J62
♣74
♠J872
Q64
85
♣AQ82
14
98
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.83   0.17  2♠ N +1   A  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
  110          1.50   1.50  2♠ N      A  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
        100    0.17   2.83  2♠ S -1   T  8-Modest-Miller vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
5 ♠76542
3
AQ743
♣T6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJT98
J8
52
♣K975
♠-
AKT62
JT98
♣J842
♠KQ3
Q9754
K6
♣AQ3
6
99
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣4/5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1NT  ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  2♠ W -2   3  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  100          2.50   0.50  3 E -2   2  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
   50          0.50   2.50  1N E -1   5  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
   50          0.50   2.50  2♠ W -1   3  8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
6 ♠KJ82
T65
Q2
♣QJ97
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠A976
KQ84
974
♣KT
♠3
AJ732
KJ5
♣8632
♠QT54
9
AT863
♣A54
9
129
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3/2♠  ♣6 ♥3 NT5
EW: 4 1NT  ♣6 ♦6/5 ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -100 4♠*-N-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3♠ N      A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        100    2.00   1.00  3♠ N -2   ♣8  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
        620    1.00   2.00  4 E      ♠4  8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
        790    0.00   3.00  4* E     ♠4  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
7 ♠Q4
KT8754
AJ
♣K94
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AKJ75
J9
QT87
♣65
♠83
A3
K654
♣QT872
♠T962
Q62
932
♣AJ3
13
119
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 3 2♠  ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   1.00  3 N      ♠8  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  140          2.00   1.00  3 N      ♠8  8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
  140          2.00   1.00  3 N      ♠3  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  110          0.00   3.00  2 N      ♠8  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
8 ♠AK73
AJ4
KJT
♣876
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q862
Q9
A875
♣QT9
♠-
K7652
Q9
♣AKJ432
♠JT954
T83
6432
♣5
16
1013
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣2 ♥3 NT4
EW: 5♣ 3 1/2NT  ♦6 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -400 5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  4 W -3   ♠A  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  110          2.00   1.00  2♠ N      ♣A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        110    1.00   2.00  2♣ E +1   ♠J  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
        150    0.00   3.00  2♣ E +3   ♠J  8-Modest-Miller vs 2-Walker-Dau
9 ♠QJ85
A2
QJ73
♣K52
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠973
73
A9542
♣A76
♠AT6
Q86
K6
♣QJT84
♠K42
KJT954
T8
♣93
13
812
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6
EW: 1♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          1.95   1.65  2 S +2   ♠9  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  140          1.65   1.95  2 S +1   5  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
10 ♠94
962
A75
♣KJ982
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AT73
K74
K943
♣Q7
♠86
T85
QJT62
♣T43
♠KQJ52
AQJ3
8
♣A65
8
123
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4 4♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.50   0.50  3N N -1   Q  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
        100    2.50   0.50  3N N -1   Q  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        200    1.00   2.00  3N N -2   Q  8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        300    0.00   3.00  3N N -3   Q  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
11 ♠A54
AK
Q84
♣AKT54
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠8
Q75
KJ763
♣9763
♠J9732
864
AT2
♣82
♠KQT6
JT932
95
♣QJ
20
65
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1 4 4♠ 2/4NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: +430 4NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   ♠3  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
  460          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   ♠3  8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
         50    1.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   6  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        100    0.00   3.00  3N N -2   ♠3  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
12 ♠QJ74
T4
A42
♣J853
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠K965
AJ9
QT3
♣AQ4
♠AT82
Q82
J75
♣K76
♠3
K7653
K986
♣T92
8
1610
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3♣ 2 2 4♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -420 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   T  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   T  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Dau
        400    0.50   2.50  3N W      ♠4  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        400    0.50   2.50  3N W      ♠4  8-Modest-Miller vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
13 ♠T7
AK72
QJ
♣AQ986
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AK986
43
K84
♣J54
♠Q2
JT
T76532
♣KT2
♠J543
Q9865
A9
♣73
16
116
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1NT  ♦4 ♠5
EW: 2 2♠  ♣5 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   1.00  4 S -1   ♠A  8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        100    2.00   1.00  4 N -1   ♠Q  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        100    2.00   1.00  4 N -1   5  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
        200    0.00   3.00  4 S -2   ♠A  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
14 ♠J7632
985
KT
♣AQ4
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K9
72
A865
♣K9762
♠T854
KQT63
Q9
♣53
♠AQ
AJ4
J7432
♣JT8
10
107
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 1 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          2.50   0.50  2N S +2   ♣6  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
  180          2.50   0.50  2N S +2   ♣6  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
  100          1.00   2.00  2 E -2   ♠A  8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
         50    0.00   3.00  2N S -1   7  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
15 ♠8
J42
AT
♣AJ96432
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠752
98765
Q52
♣T7
♠KQJ63
AQ3
KJ73
♣5
♠AT94
KT
9864
♣KQ8
10
216
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 4NT  ♦6 ♥5 ♠5
EW: 1 1 2♠  ♣2 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +500 5♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  5♣ N      ♠K  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
  300          2.00   1.00  4♠* E -2  ♣K  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
  150          1.00   2.00  3♣ N +2   ♠K  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
  100          0.00   3.00  3♠ E -2   ♣K  8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
16 ♠76
KJ5
A983
♣Q863
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AQT3
T9764
QT7
♣J
♠K94
AQ2
KJ6
♣AKT4
♠J852
83
542
♣9752
10
920
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5 6 6♠ 6NT
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        650    2.50   0.50  4♠ W +1   ♣3  8-Modest-Miller vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        650    2.50   0.50  4 E +1   5  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 2-Walker-Dau
        660    1.00   2.00  3N E +2   ♣7  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        680    0.00   3.00  4 E +2   5  5-Sedey-Hamlin vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
17 ♠AT6
T76
A87654
♣8
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠984
A52
T93
♣AJ64
♠Q7532
KJ9
KQJ
♣97
♠KJ
Q843
2
♣KQT532
8
912
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1/-  ♥7/6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  3N E -3   2  8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
   50          1.50   1.50  3♠ E -1   2  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
   50          1.50   1.50  2♠ E -1   2  2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
         50    0.00   3.00  3♣ S -1   ♠4  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
18 ♠KJ752
A95
Q4
♣AT4
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠94
T432
KJ985
♣Q8
♠QT863
J7
62
♣K975
♠A
KQ86
AT73
♣J632
14
66
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3 4 3♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          3.00   0.00  3N S +2   8  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  630          2.00   1.00  3N S +1   8  8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  600          0.50   2.50  3N S      ♠9  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
  600          0.50   2.50  3N S      9  2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
19 ♠QJ43
4
K9
♣AKQT96
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠98
KJ
J8763
♣8753
♠AT752
9832
AQ2
♣2
♠K6
AQT765
T54
♣J4
15
510
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 1/2♠ 1NT  ♦5
EW: 1  ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.50   0.50  3N N      5  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
  400          2.50   0.50  3N N      2  8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
         50    1.00   2.00  2 S -1   6  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        100    0.00   3.00  3N S -2   9  2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
20 ♠A32
J963
T65
♣985
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J9
AK2
843
♣AKQ72
♠QT765
8
AKQJ7
♣J6
♠K84
QT754
92
♣T43
5
1713
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1
EW: 5♣ 5 2 4♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        690    2.00   1.00  3N W +3   5  6-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Llacera-Sterling
        690    2.00   1.00  3N W +3   3  8-Modest-Miller vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
        690    2.00   1.00  3N W +3   2  2-Walker-Dau vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        720    0.00   3.00  3N W +4   3  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
21 ♠865
AQT75
AJ
♣AJ5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ92
KJ64
K7
♣Q74
♠A74
9832
652
♣KT3
♠KT3
-
QT9843
♣9862
16
127
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5/6 ♠5/6 NT4/5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2 E -3   8  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  130          1.50   1.50  3 S +1   ♠Q  8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
  130          1.50   1.50  3 N +1   ♣3  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        400    0.00   3.00  3N N -4   ♠7  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
22 ♠Q5
A732
85
♣A9743
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AJT642
9
AQ6
♣T65
♠K97
J854
J972
♣KQ
♠83
KQT6
KT43
♣J82
10
1110
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦5 ♠2 NT4
EW: 2 5♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.00   0.00  3♠ W +1   A  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        200    1.50   1.50  3♠ W +2   8  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
        200    1.50   1.50  2♠ W +3   8  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
        230    0.00   3.00  2♠ W +4   8  8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
23 ♠Q942
963
AKT43
♣9
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠7
K
J65
♣KQJT7542
♠5
AQT8
Q9872
♣A83
♠AKJT863
J7542
-
♣6
9
1012
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣1 ♦5 NT2
EW: 3♣ 2  ♥4 ♠2 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 22 = -4
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3♠ S +1   ♣K  8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
        100    2.00   1.00  5♠ S -1   ♣K  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        200    0.50   2.50  5♠ S -2   K  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
        200    0.50   2.50  5♠ S -2   ♣K  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
24 ♠AT
852
QT53
♣QT87
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KQJ42
T
AK972
♣A3
♠853
A743
84
♣9652
♠976
KQJ96
J6
♣KJ4
8
174
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2  ♦4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 3 3♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♥5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  6♠ W -3   2  8-Modest-Miller vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
  140          2.00   1.00  3 S      ♠K  7-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Walker-Dau
   50          1.00   2.00  4♠ W -1   3  3-Spencer-Millslagle vs 4-Hullman-Pender
         50    0.00   3.00  3 S -1   ♣A  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
25 ♠T
AQ42
J8542
♣K85
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A32
KJ3
KQT7
♣Q73
♠J98764
6
963
♣JT4
♠KQ5
T9875
A
♣A962
10
152
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 5 3NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  590          3.00   0.00  4* S     ♠A  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
  420          2.00   1.00  4 S      K  2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
  170          1.00   2.00  3 S +1   K  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  140          0.00   3.00  3 S      K  8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
26 ♠A762
J7
753
♣KQ92
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠QJ9
AKT8
KQT
♣754
♠K854
Q942
AJ4
♣86
♠T3
653
9862
♣AJT3
10
1510
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 4 3♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3N W -1   ♣2  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      7  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      3  8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
        620    1.00   2.00  4 W      ♣K  2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
27 ♠732
K95
Q7652
♣65
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AKQ84
QJT
3
♣J832
♠65
8732
J84
♣AT94
♠JT9
A64
AKT9
♣KQ7
5
135
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1NT  ♣5 ♥6 ♠5
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠  ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  3♠ W -2   5  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  100          2.50   0.50  2♠ W -2   5  2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
   90          1.00   2.00  1N S      ♠A  8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski
        110    0.00   3.00  2♠ W      ♣9  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
28 ♠T7
AQ4
AQ8543
♣J7
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠Q964
T62
JT
♣AK83
♠KJ85
98
K9
♣T9642
♠A32
KJ753
762
♣Q5
13
107
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3 1NT  ♣4 ♠4
EW: 3♣ 3♠  ♦3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2 S +1   ♣A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Sedey-Hamlin
  130          2.00   1.00  3 N +1   ♣9  1-Llacera-Sterling vs 3-Spencer-Millslagle
        200    0.50   2.50  4 S -2   ♣A  2-Walker-Dau vs 6-Gamble-Llacera
        200    0.50   2.50  4 S -2   ♣A  8-Modest-Miller vs 7-Johnson-Wesolowski