1 |
♠AJ63
♥AKJ8
♦T6
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 1/2♠ 1/2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N N ♦7 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
50 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♦7 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -2 ♦7 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
2 |
♠9
♥KQ962
♦Q763
♣T87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣6 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣6 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥4 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
3 |
♠KT3
♥Q4
♦Q876
♣AT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♠6 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
50 1.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♠6 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 ♣2 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
4 |
♠Q65
♥KQJ8654
♦Q2
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 ♥K 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Slinger-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ N ♦A 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
100 0.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥T 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
5 |
♠J2
♥AQJ53
♦97
♣A954
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠A 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
300 1.00 1.00 4♠* E -2 ♥K 6-Slinger-Loops vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠A 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
6 |
♠AQ
♥AK92
♦98
♣AJT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 1♣ N +2 ♦K 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 2-Loops-Walker
90 1.00 1.00 1♣ N +1 ♦7 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣5 6-Slinger-Loops vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
7 |
♠T972
♥75
♦J96
♣KJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥7 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♥3 6-Slinger-Loops vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 0.00 2.00 1♦ S -1 ♥K 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
8 |
♠J732
♥AKQT5
♦T8
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♥3 6-Slinger-Loops vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 1.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 ♥A 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥2 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
9 |
♠AJ653
♥Q
♦J543
♣832
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2/3♠ ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3/1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ W ♦3 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Slinger-Loops
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣A 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Walker
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣A 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
10 |
♠542
♥AT4
♦T8742
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦A 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
170 1.00 1.00 1♠ S +3 ♦A 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Slinger-Loops
150 0.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♥2 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
11 |
♠J74
♥986
♦32
♣95432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♦3 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Slinger-Loops
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ W +2 ♦8 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦3 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
12 |
♠KT3
♥K976
♦KJ
♣Q954
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♠8 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ N +2 ♠A 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 6-Slinger-Loops
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W ♠3 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
13 |
♠T76
♥5
♦76532
♣8742
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5/4♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 5N W +1 ♦4 6-Slinger-Loops vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
1440 0.50 1.50 6N E ♥K 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
1440 0.50 1.50 6N E ♥4 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
14 |
♠KJT8
♥A
♦AKQ2
♣AK95
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣2 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
430 1.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣2 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
400 0.00 2.00 3N N ♥T 6-Slinger-Loops vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
|
15 |
♠QJ642
♥7
♦AKT9
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠6/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 6-Slinger-Loops vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
100 1.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 ♠Q 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦A 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
16 |
♠43
♥AK952
♦AQJ652
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 2♦ N +2 ♣A 6-Slinger-Loops vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ N +1 ♣A 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
50 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 5-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
17 |
♠K9842
♥KT4
♦62
♣Q84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N W ♠4 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
430 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♦4 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
430 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥5 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
|
18 |
♠AJ84
♥KQ9
♦A953
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/5 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣2 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
250 1.00 1.00 1♥ E -5 ♣2 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦T 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
|
19 |
♠KT732
♥Q
♦K9863
♣74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 2.00 0.00 4♠ N -5 ♥9 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠2 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♦6 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
|
20 |
♠Q7
♥A62
♦A84
♣JT853
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠4 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ N ♠A 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Sedey-Wesolowski
100 0.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
|
21 |
♠KT9642
♥95
♦QJ4
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +3 ♥6 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Walker
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +3 ♥6 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 6-Slinger-Loops
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
|
22 |
♠KJT87
♥J8
♦KT96
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣2 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ S -2 ♣2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Walker
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♣2 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
23 |
♠AK74
♥A85
♦762
♣T75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♠4 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 6-Slinger-Loops
90 1.00 1.00 1N W ♠3 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
150 0.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♣T 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
24 |
♠9
♥QJ9
♦AKQ93
♣Q754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 5♦ N ♥A 3-Sedey-Wesolowski vs 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop
400 1.50 0.50 5♦ N ♣K 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 6-Slinger-Loops
100 0.00 2.00 4♥* W -1 ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
25 |
♠J54
♥AKQT2
♦9
♣AT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣6 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣K 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦2 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
26 |
♠KJT3
♥T5
♦KT96
♣Q92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣7 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♥T 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Loops
|
27 |
♠AKJ95
♥J4
♦KJ97
♣73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♣A 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Loops
120 0.50 1.50 2N S ♦6 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
120 0.50 1.50 2N S ♣4 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
|
28 |
♠32
♥J7
♦Q83
♣JT8742
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣7 4-Modest-Laborde Bishop vs 5-Pringle-Vadas
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣J 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Loops
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣J 8-Llacera-Nelson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|