1 |
♠A7
♥KQ953
♦J93
♣KT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠K 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 6-Garland-Christensen
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠K 6-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠9 3-Bailey-Owens vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦2 5-Kim-Gassman vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♠K 1-Russak-Buhr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
2 |
♠532
♥KQJT53
♦7
♣K76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 6/4♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N W ♥K 3-Bailey-Owens vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
400 3.50 0.50 3N E ♦J 5-Kim-Gassman vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
430 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥K 6-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
430 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥T 1-Russak-Buhr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♦J 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 6-Garland-Christensen
|
3 |
♠T7
♥82
♦765
♣KJ9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3NT ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♣ S +2 ♠6 1-Russak-Buhr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♣3 6-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♣5 5-Kim-Gassman vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦9 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 6-Garland-Christensen
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣7 3-Bailey-Owens vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|
4 |
♠74
♥T732
♦9872
♣K73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♥Q 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♦Q 1-Russak-Buhr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♦Q 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
180 1.00 3.00 2N S +2 ♣6 6-Frank-Kelly vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
140 0.00 4.00 1♠ S +2 ♥Q 5-Kim-Gassman vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
5 |
♠AT
♥Q85
♦QJ54
♣Q432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3/1♦ 5/4♥ 1/-♠ 4NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦K 6-Frank-Kelly vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦A 1-Russak-Buhr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦A 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +2 ♠2 5-Kim-Gassman vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
|
6 |
♠52
♥9764
♦QJ82
♣J52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣2 1-Russak-Buhr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ E ♦A 6-Frank-Kelly vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
120 1.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♥4 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
120 1.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♦Q 5-Kim-Gassman vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
120 1.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♦2 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
|
7 |
♠AQJT2
♥KQ
♦Q9
♣AJT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♦5 3-Bailey-Owens vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣7 6-Frank-Kelly vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣8 1-Russak-Buhr vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ S ♥9 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -1 ♣7 5-Kim-Gassman vs 6-Garland-Christensen
|
8 |
♠KT742
♥A
♦KQ2
♣KQ73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2/1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥T 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
180 2.50 1.50 2N S +2 ♦4 1-Russak-Buhr vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
180 2.50 1.50 2N N +2 ♣2 6-Frank-Kelly vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ N ♠9 3-Bailey-Owens vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ N ♦7 5-Kim-Gassman vs 6-Garland-Christensen
|
9 |
♠Q8543
♥KT
♦A2
♣JT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♦6 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♠2 5-Kim-Gassman vs 6-Garland-Christensen
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♠2 6-Frank-Kelly vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♥3 3-Bailey-Owens vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♥3 1-Russak-Buhr vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
|
10 |
♠97632
♥AT9
♦932
♣KT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♣3 2-Barr-Barr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 ♠4 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♠2 6-Frank-Kelly vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠6 3-Bailey-Owens vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠4 1-Russak-Buhr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
|
11 |
♠8
♥JT7652
♦85
♣KT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣2 6-Frank-Kelly vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♦7 2-Barr-Barr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♣Q 1-Russak-Buhr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥J 3-Bailey-Owens vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
150 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♦K 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|
12 |
♠AT842
♥A763
♦Q42
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦J 3-Bailey-Owens vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
50 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -1 ♥3 6-Frank-Kelly vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♦J 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♦7 2-Barr-Barr vs 6-Garland-Christensen
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ E +2 ♦J 1-Russak-Buhr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
|
13 |
♠KT3
♥K873
♦KJ973
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♣* W -3 ♥3 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣A 1-Russak-Buhr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♣Q 5-Kim-Gassman vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
200 1.00 3.00 4♣ W -2 ♦9 3-Bailey-Owens vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ S ♠Q 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|
14 |
♠AQJ5
♥Q2
♦AT986
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.25 0.75 3N S ♠4 5-Kim-Gassman vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
400 3.25 0.75 3N S ♦3 1-Russak-Buhr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
200 1.38 2.63 2♠ N +3 ♦6 3-Bailey-Owens vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
50 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♣6 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|
15 |
♠QJ432
♥J72
♦94
♣832
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 ♦5 1-Russak-Buhr vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
130 2.63 1.38 3♣ W +1 ♠Q 3-Bailey-Owens vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
300 1.38 2.63 2♦ S -3 ♥K 5-Kim-Gassman vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
400 0.13 3.88 3N W ♠Q 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|
16 |
♠A752
♥J96
♦JT642
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E +1 ♥3 5-Kim-Gassman vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ W +2 ♦J 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♦3 3-Bailey-Owens vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♦3 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♦3 6-Frank-Kelly vs 6-Garland-Christensen
|
17 |
♠A4
♥QJ9643
♦K4
♣QT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣8 5-Kim-Gassman vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♥T 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♥3 6-Frank-Kelly vs 6-Garland-Christensen
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦6 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 ♦2 3-Bailey-Owens vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
|
18 |
♠T543
♥K63
♦T985
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6/5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦T 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Shoemaker-Bear
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ W +1 ♥K 6-Frank-Kelly vs 6-Garland-Christensen
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ E +1 ♥3 3-Bailey-Owens vs 5-Beiers-Lynnes
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♥5 4-Stone-Corgiat vs 2-Foy-Kissiah
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +2 ♥3 5-Kim-Gassman vs 4-Elkins-Raphael
|