1 |
♠T72
♥T
♦T62
♣KJ9765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♦A 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 5.00 1.00 1♥ S -1 ♦4 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 2-Loops-Loops
100 4.00 2.00 2N N -2 ♦8 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ W ♥T 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
110 2.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 ♠5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 1.00 5.00 1♠ E +2 ♥T 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
150 0.00 6.00 2N W +1 ♥T 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠A83
♥J63
♦KT743
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♦5 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 2-Loops-Loops
130 5.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♠2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 2.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
140 2.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠3 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
140 2.50 3.50 3♥ W ♦3 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♦4 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.00 6.00 3♥ W +1 ♦3 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
3 |
♠7
♥AKT53
♦AQ63
♣QT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ 3NT ♣5/7 ♥5/6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 5.00 1.00 3♦ S ♣5 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♣5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
100 3.00 3.00 1♥* N -1 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 1.50 4.50 3♠ W ♥A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
140 1.50 4.50 2♠ W +1 ♥A 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 2-Loops-Loops
300 0.00 6.00 5♦* N -2 ♣A 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
4 |
♠J4
♥QJ5
♦AKQ
♣JT732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 1.00 2N N ♠2 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
120 5.00 1.00 2N N ♣8 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
120 5.00 1.00 2N N ♣4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
90 3.00 3.00 1N N ♣4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
100 2.00 4.00 2♣ N -1 ♥T 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 5.50 3N N -2 ♥T 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Loops
200 0.50 5.50 3♥* S -1 ♣5 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
|
5 |
♠2
♥9
♦T9752
♣JT9876
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦8 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣A 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
460 2.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥5 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
480 1.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♣A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
490 0.00 6.00 3N W +3 ♥9 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
6 |
♠AKQ84
♥K2
♦T85
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
210 5.00 1.00 2N S +3 ♥3 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
140 2.50 3.50 3♠ N ♦K 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 2-Loops-Loops
140 2.50 3.50 2♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
140 2.50 3.50 2♠ N +1 ♦A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.50 3.50 1♠ N +2 ♦A 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
120 0.00 6.00 2N S ♥3 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠85
♥QJ93
♦A863
♣T94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ W +1 ♥Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Loops
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥3 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
620 4.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥3 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
650 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
650 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.00 5.00 4♠ W +2 ♥Q 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
1430 0.00 6.00 6♠ W ♦A 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
|
8 |
♠AJ72
♥QJ73
♦A
♣AT82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 6.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♦5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Loops
450 4.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦5 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
450 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.00 4.00 4♠ S ♦5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
420 2.00 4.00 4♠ S ♦2 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
420 2.00 4.00 4♠ N ♣5 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ N +2 ♥A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
9 |
♠AK93
♥J2
♦Q43
♣Q432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣5 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
50 3.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♣5 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♣5 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
50 3.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♣5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
50 3.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦J 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♥K 1-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 6.00 3N S -3 ♥K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
10 |
♠J75
♥-
♦JT74
♣AQJ975
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4/5♥ 1/3NT ♣3/4 ♦4 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 5♥ E -1 ♣T 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣T 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
620 4.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦6 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦9 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣T 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
680 0.00 6.00 4♥ E +2 ♦6 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
11 |
♠A943
♥J652
♦J52
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 6♣ W -1 ♠A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
460 4.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠3 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Loops
460 4.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠3 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
490 3.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♥4 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
520 2.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♠3 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
920 1.00 5.00 6♣ W ♦J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
990 0.00 6.00 6N E ♥4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
|
12 |
♠QJ84
♥KJ962
♦A75
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 6.00 0.00 4♥* W -4 ♣4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
150 4.50 1.50 3N E -3 ♣Q 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Loops-Loops
150 4.50 1.50 3♥ W -3 ♣4 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
100 3.00 3.00 3N E -2 ♥2 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♦9 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♣T 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
500 0.00 6.00 4♦* S -2 ♥A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
13 |
♠QJT2
♥7542
♦Q4
♣J95
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4/5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 5N E -2 ♥6 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 4.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥5 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
150 3.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♠Q 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
170 2.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♣9 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
180 1.00 5.00 1N W +3 ♠Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Loops-Loops
600 0.00 6.00 3N W ♣5 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠T65
♥Q8732
♦72
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♦A 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
50 5.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♦A 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Loops-Loops
110 3.00 3.00 3♣ E ♦A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
110 3.00 3.00 3♣ E ♦A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
130 1.00 5.00 4♣ E ♦A 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
400 0.00 6.00 5♣ E ♦A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
15 |
♠K983
♥65
♦876432
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♥6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 1♥ W -3 ♣J 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♣J 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.50 2.50 1N W -1 ♠3 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
50 3.50 2.50 2♣ W -1 ♠3 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ E ♣K 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Loops-Loops
100 1.00 5.00 1N S -1 ♣6 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
300 0.00 6.00 3♦ S -3 ♥Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
|
16 |
♠K6
♥J762
♦T963
♣T32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♦3 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
100 5.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 4.00 2.00 2♣ E +1 ♠3 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ E ♠3 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♣J 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Loops-Loops
620 0.50 5.50 4♠ E ♣J 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
620 0.50 5.50 4♠ E ♣6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
17 |
♠AK42
♥AJT92
♦K82
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 6.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♣3 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
990 5.00 1.00 6N S ♣8 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
980 4.00 2.00 6♥ N ♦J 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Loops-Loops
520 3.00 3.00 4N N +3 ♣3 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♦J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
420 1.00 5.00 4♥ N ♦J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 6.00 3♥ N +2 ♣T 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
18 |
♠42
♥K8
♦K76542
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2/1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.50 0.50 2♦ N ♥A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Loops-Loops
90 5.50 0.50 2♦ N ♣8 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
170 4.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♠2 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ W ♦5 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ W ♦5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦9 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
|
19 |
♠KJ9652
♥Q83
♦97
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6/5 ♥5/4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♥2 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♦A 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣2 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 3.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♣K 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Loops
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♥6 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 5.00 3♠ S -1 ♥2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
50 1.00 5.00 3♠ S -1 ♣K 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠6
♥AJ98
♦AKJ83
♣AK5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥4 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
660 5.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♣3 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
630 3.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♥4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Loops
630 3.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♥4 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
600 1.50 4.50 3N N ♥7 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
600 1.50 4.50 3N N ♥4 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
200 0.00 6.00 3N N -2 ♥4 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
21 |
♠AJT72
♥JT84
♦43
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4/3♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♣6 5-Hahn-Cowen vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
180 5.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♦A 4-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Kobland-GUMZ
170 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♣Q 2-Sterling-Davidson vs 4-Corgiat-Rodrigues
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ S ♠8 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Loops-Loops
110 2.00 4.00 3♣ W ♦3 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Nathanson-Cottel
200 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 ♣Q 3-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.00 6.00 3N N -3 ♦J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|