1 |
♠QJ93
♥A974
♦AJT
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2/3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +2 ♥6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Davidson
450 3.10 1.90 4♠ S +1 ♥6 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
450 3.10 1.90 4♠ N +1 ♥6 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 10-Harken-Harken
420 0.70 4.30 4♠ S ♣4 12-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
420 0.70 4.30 4♠ N ♥3 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠Q865
♥A9743
♦A4
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +1 ♦8 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
620 3.10 1.90 4♠ S ♠2 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 10-Harken-Harken
620 3.10 1.90 4♠ S ♠2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Davidson
110 1.30 3.70 2♥ N ♠2 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.10 4.90 4♠ S -1 ♠2 12-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
3 |
♠K8732
♥T2
♦9652
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 3N E -2 ♠J 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Davidson
100 3.70 1.30 4♣ W -1 ♠K 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.90 3.10 4♠* S -1 ♣7 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.90 3.10 4♠* S -1 ♣2 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 10-Harken-Harken
150 0.10 4.90 4♣ W +1 ♠3 12-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
4 |
♠A94
♥A2
♦AQJT
♣QT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 2/3♥ 1/2♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.30 0.70 1N N +3 ♠7 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
180 4.30 0.70 1N N +3 ♠3 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Loops-Davidson
110 2.50 2.50 2♣ S +1 ♥4 12-Miller-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.30 3.70 2♥ W +1 ♣7 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
200 0.10 4.90 1N N -2 ♠2 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
|
5 |
♠Q96
♥A9874
♦5
♣KQT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.70 1.30 5♥ N ♠A 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
650 3.70 1.30 4♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
650 3.70 1.30 4♥ N +1 ♠A 12-Miller-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.70 4.30 4♠ E -3 ♥3 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Loops-Davidson
150 0.70 4.30 3♠ E -3 ♥5 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
|
6 |
♠532
♥97
♦Q743
♣Q963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.30 0.70 4♠ W ♥9 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
620 4.30 0.70 5♦ E +1 ♥4 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
630 2.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣3 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Loops-Davidson
1370 0.70 4.30 6♦ E ♠9 12-Miller-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
1370 0.70 4.30 6♦ E ♥4 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠AQ653
♥T74
♦T72
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.90 0.10 3♠ N ♦A 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
130 3.70 1.30 4♣ W ♦2 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
150 2.50 2.50 4♣ W +1 ♥4 12-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
200 0.70 4.30 3♠ N -2 ♥9 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Loops-Davidson
200 0.70 4.30 3♠ N -2 ♣4 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
8 |
♠QT84
♥J8
♦AKJ2
♣KT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3/2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.90 0.10 4♥ S +2 ♦7 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Loops-Davidson
450 3.70 1.30 4♥ S +1 ♣A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ S ♣A 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.30 3.70 4♥ S -2 ♦9 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
150 0.10 4.90 2N N -3 ♣3 12-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
|
9 |
♠9752
♥T5
♦Q985
♣954
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.70 1.30 3N W -1 ♠2 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
100 3.70 1.30 3N E -1 ♣K 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 3.70 1.30 3♦ E -1 ♣K 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.70 4.30 3N E ♣K 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Loops-Davidson
600 0.70 4.30 3N E ♣K 12-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
|
10 |
♠732
♥KQ87
♦942
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠7/6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.30 0.70 4♥ S +1 ♠Q 10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
650 4.30 0.70 4♥ S +1 ♠8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ S ♠Q 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ S ♠Q 12-Miller-Osborn vs 4-Loops-Davidson
600 0.10 4.90 3N S ♠6 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
11 |
♠52
♥K
♦AQJ984
♣JT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.90 0.10 5♦ N ♥2 10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
350 3.70 1.30 4♣ W -7 ♦7 12-Miller-Osborn vs 4-Loops-Davidson
150 2.50 2.50 3♦ N +2 ♥2 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
100 1.30 3.70 3♥ W -2 ♠5 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
500 0.10 4.90 4♠* S -3 ♣Q 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠J7
♥QJ
♦A765
♣AQT95
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.90 0.10 5♣ N ♦K 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
170 3.70 1.30 3♠ S +1 ♥A 12-Miller-Osborn vs 4-Loops-Davidson
100 2.50 2.50 2♥ W -2 ♠J 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.30 3.70 2♥ W -1 ♥Q 10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 0.10 4.90 5♣ N -1 ♥T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|
13 |
♠J852
♥T7
♦T98742
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3/2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.90 0.10 2♥ W +2 ♠2 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
180 3.70 1.30 2N E +2 ♠9 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♦2 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♣K 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 10-Harken-Harken
650 0.10 4.90 4♥ W +1 ♠2 12-Miller-Osborn vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
|
14 |
♠95
♥92
♦QT76
♣AK965
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 4♠ E -1 ♥4 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 3.70 1.30 2♠ E ♥4 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E ♥4 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 10-Harken-Harken
170 1.30 3.70 3♠ E +1 ♥3 12-Miller-Osborn vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
1100 0.10 4.90 5♣* N -5 ♠A 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
|
15 |
♠T432
♥852
♦KT7
♣A64
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 1N W -1 ♠2 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
90 3.70 1.30 1♦ W +1 ♥8 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 10-Harken-Harken
120 2.50 2.50 1N W +1 ♠2 12-Miller-Osborn vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
130 1.30 3.70 3♦ W +1 ♠2 9-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
150 0.10 4.90 1N W +2 ♠2 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
16 |
♠AK9743
♥JT
♦AK
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 1.00 5♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Harken-Harken
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♥A 12-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♣3 4-Loops-Davidson vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
460 2.00 3.00 3N S +2 ♥3 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.00 5.00 6N S -1 ♥3 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
17 |
♠QJ
♥AJ54
♦8642
♣T95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N W ♥5 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦J 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Harken-Harken
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦J 4-Loops-Davidson vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦3 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
480 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♥7 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
980 0.00 5.00 6♠ E ♦J 12-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
|
18 |
♠K943
♥A8
♦KQT
♣AK86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 1♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥6 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 5.00 0.00 6♠ S ♣Q 12-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
710 4.00 1.00 4♠ N +3 ♥K 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♥K 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♦4 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Harken-Harken
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♦4 4-Loops-Davidson vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
680 1.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♦2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
19 |
♠QT
♥Q7
♦T96543
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4/3 ♦3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 5♦ N ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♠3 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 4-Loops-Davidson
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♦8 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
50 2.00 3.00 5♦ N -1 ♥A 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ E ♦A 12-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
170 0.00 5.00 2♥ E +2 ♦A 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
20 |
♠K75
♥AQ832
♦T2
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠8 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦A 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ S ♦6 12-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ N ♦A 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
200 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♦A 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 4-Loops-Davidson
|
21 |
♠T4
♥J98
♦J87
♣J9754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ 3/1NT ♣6/5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N E +1 ♥6 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 4-Loops-Davidson
400 4.00 1.00 3N E ♥6 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥8 12-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣4 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
450 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♦5 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
450 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♦5 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
|
22 |
♠AJT3
♥T87
♦J652
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♠ W ♣J 12-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
650 2.00 3.00 5♠ E ♥3 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♠3 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥T 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Loops-Davidson
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦2 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣J 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
23 |
♠J7
♥KJT
♦QJT54
♣T97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣T 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 3.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥3 12-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♦8 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 3.00 2♣ W +2 ♦Q 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Loops-Davidson
150 1.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♦Q 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♦Q 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
24 |
♠73
♥AQ96
♦Q7
♣AQ642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦2 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦A 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Loops-Davidson
150 3.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♠3 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Traback-Tidmore
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♠7 3-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Ficarrotta-Walker
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♠7 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
400 1.00 4.00 5♦ W ♠7 12-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
550 0.00 5.00 3N* E ♠K 6-Kobland-Abraham vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
25 |
♠876542
♥JT5
♦KJ
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0 ♦6 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 3N W -2 ♦K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
100 3.70 1.30 3♠ E -1 ♥K 4-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
150 2.50 2.50 3♣ E +2 ♠9 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 10-Harken-Harken
190 1.30 3.70 2♣ E +5 ♠9 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
660 0.10 4.90 3N W +2 ♠5 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
26 |
♠T873
♥T9863
♦65
♣62
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.30 0.70 6N E -1 ♣A 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 10-Harken-Harken
100 4.30 0.70 6N E -1 ♣A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♣7 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
630 1.90 3.10 3N E +1 ♣7 4-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
660 0.10 4.90 3N E +2 ♣7 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
|
27 |
♠98762
♥-
♦82
♣KQJ432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.30 0.70 4♠ N -1 ♥K 4-Loops-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 4.30 0.70 4♠ N -1 ♥4 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 11-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♣K 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Mohan-Mohan
420 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♣K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Kobland-Abraham
800 0.10 4.90 4♠* N -4 ♥K 5-Traback-Tidmore vs 10-Harken-Harken
|