1 |
♠AKJ98
♥J82
♦72
♣J85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 3♦ W +2 ♠A 6-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥4 10-Traback-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♠A 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Modest
430 0.13 3.88 3N E +1 ♠3 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
|
2 |
♠AK7
♥AQJ
♦KQJT6
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.88 0.13 2N N +2 ♥4 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
110 2.63 1.38 1♦ N +2 ♣A 10-Traback-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.38 2.63 4♠ S -1 ♣K 6-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♣5 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Modest
|
3 |
♠A976
♥AJ964
♦-
♣AT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1/2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ N ♦Q 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ N ♦Q 10-Traback-Osborn vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.63 1.38 2♥ N +1 ♦Q 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Modest
90 0.13 3.88 1N S ♦A 6-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
4 |
♠A865
♥QT98
♦Q92
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N N ♥5 1-Cowen-Loops vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
100 2.63 1.38 2♦ S -1 ♥6 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
300 0.75 3.25 2♠ N -3 ♥A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.75 3.25 3♦ N -3 ♥A 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Modest
|
5 |
♠KQ864
♥Q
♦J85
♣QT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +2 ♣2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥5 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦K 1-Cowen-Loops vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
230 0.13 3.88 2♠ N +4 ♥3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Modest
|
6 |
♠54
♥A5
♦AT8532
♣A63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N N ♣2 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
50 1.38 2.63 3N S -1 ♣4 1-Cowen-Loops vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
50 1.38 2.63 4♠ S -1 ♦7 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Modest
50 1.38 2.63 4♥ S -1 ♦7 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠A85
♥A542
♦AJ63
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 6/5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♥ S +1 ♦8 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
650 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +1 ♣A 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ S ♦8 10-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Loops
100 0.13 3.88 6♥ N -1 ♥3 2-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠KQ
♥J983
♦KJ63
♣742
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N N ♣8 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
50 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣T 10-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Loops
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♥Q 2-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♠2 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
9 |
♠-
♥Q2
♦AQJ964
♣J9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣0 ♦2/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 5♣ N +1 ♦K 10-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Loops
400 2.00 2.00 5♣ N ♠5 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
400 2.00 2.00 5♣ N ♥4 2-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.13 3.88 4♦ N -1 ♥J 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
10 |
♠A864
♥97543
♦KJ42
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2/3♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -1 ♥4 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
180 2.63 1.38 1N W +3 ♦2 1-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
600 0.75 3.25 3N W ♦2 10-Traback-Osborn vs 2-Loops-Modest
600 0.75 3.25 3N E ♥T 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
11 |
♠A982
♥8753
♦32
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♦ S ♠Q 10-Traback-Osborn vs 2-Loops-Modest
150 2.63 1.38 4♣ E +1 ♦A 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.75 3.25 5♣ W ♦3 1-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
400 0.75 3.25 5♣ E ♥T 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
12 |
♠AQJ83
♥A
♦A87
♣K973
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♦3 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♣2 1-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♣2 10-Traback-Osborn vs 2-Loops-Modest
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♦5 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
13 |
♠872
♥965
♦QT2
♣J987
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ ♣5/6 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ S ♠3 1-Cowen-Loops vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♥8 10-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
120 2.00 2.00 2N S ♣K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♦A 2-Loops-Modest vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
14 |
♠862
♥K85
♦A9863
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 3♦ N +2 ♣K 1-Cowen-Loops vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
150 3.50 0.50 2♦ N +3 ♦T 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ N +1 ♣5 2-Loops-Modest vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ N +1 ♣5 10-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
110 0.00 4.00 1♥ S +1 ♠Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
15 |
♠AQJ842
♥AK
♦A4
♣754
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 5♠ N +1 ♦9 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♦8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ N ♦8 10-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♠T 1-Cowen-Loops vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
230 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +4 ♦8 2-Loops-Modest vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
16 |
♠AK2
♥QJ5
♦J965
♣A75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♠9 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Harken-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 1♦ W -1 ♠A 10-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♠6 2-Loops-Modest vs 1-Cowen-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♠6 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♠6 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
17 |
♠AKJ82
♥Q3
♦973
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 1♠ N -1 ♠2 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
50 3.50 0.50 1♠ N -1 ♣A 10-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♠T 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Harken-Harken
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠A 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♠T 2-Loops-Modest vs 1-Cowen-Loops
|
18 |
♠T6
♥AJT
♦T6532
♣Q74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2/1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠K 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♥3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♥K 10-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♠K 2-Loops-Modest vs 1-Cowen-Loops
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♠2 9-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠A86
♥65
♦872
♣AJT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4/3♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠K 1-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
230 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +3 ♠K 6-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠K 10-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
100 0.00 4.00 5♥* S -1 ♣6 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Loops-Modest
|
20 |
♠K7
♥J8732
♦763
♣T63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4/3 NT6/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♥3 6-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦3 1-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♥3 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♥3 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Loops-Modest
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♣5 10-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
21 |
♠85
♥A3
♦9763
♣KQJ93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♣K 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Loops-Modest
170 3.00 1.00 4♦ S +2 ♠A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ S ♠A 10-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♣5 1-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -1 ♠A 6-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
22 |
♠KJT65
♥K93
♦Q83
♣62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♠* W -1 ♣6 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♦3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Cowen-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♦3 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♦Q 10-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♣6 2-Loops-Modest vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
23 |
♠J8
♥JT964
♦AK5
♣JT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♣K 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♣K 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣7 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Cowen-Loops
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ E +1 ♥Q 10-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Harken-Harken
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ E +1 ♣K 2-Loops-Modest vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
24 |
♠9542
♥Q
♦KT98753
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 2-Loops-Modest vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♣7 7-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♣3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Cowen-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ W -1 ♣7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦Q 10-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
25 |
♠AT65
♥-
♦86542
♣AT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +1 ♣5 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♥Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Cowen-Loops
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ N -1 ♣6 10-Traback-Osborn vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
26 |
♠J965432
♥AK
♦Q853
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 4♣ E +1 ♠Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Cowen-Loops
600 2.00 2.00 5♣ W ♥A 10-Traback-Osborn vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
600 2.00 2.00 5♣ E ♠2 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
630 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♠4 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
27 |
♠754
♥K
♦J754
♣KJ763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♥ ♦1 ♥7/6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 2♦ E +2 ♣4 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 9-Pringle-Vadas
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Cowen-Loops
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ W ♥K 10-Traback-Osborn vs 7-Ficarrotta-Walker
|