1 |
♠AQT963
♥Q8
♦K83
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3/2♥ 6/5♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 3.00 0.00 6N S ♥T 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 8-Loops-Martin
490 1.50 1.50 3N S +3 ♥5 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Hullman-Pender
490 1.50 1.50 3N N +3 ♥8 9-Dau-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
100 0.00 3.00 6♦ S -2 ♦2 7-Modest-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
|
2 |
♠J7
♥J43
♦987
♣AJ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♠ ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥4/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠3 7-Modest-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥J 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Hullman-Pender
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♥2 9-Dau-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥3 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
3 |
♠Q86
♥J943
♦T872
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♦A 9-Dau-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ E +2 ♦A 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Hullman-Pender
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦A 7-Modest-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦A 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
4 |
♠-
♥A543
♦A743
♣98742
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ S ♠7 8-Loops-Martin vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
200 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♦2 1-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♣J 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♣J 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 9-Dau-Walker
|
5 |
♠JT98
♥K9
♦KQT7
♣JT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♥8 1-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
430 2.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♦8 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 9-Dau-Walker
460 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♥3 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
460 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♥3 8-Loops-Martin vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
6 |
♠85
♥KT42
♦AK4
♣A974
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ N ♣K 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 9-Dau-Walker
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ E ♦3 8-Loops-Martin vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
200 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -4 ♣6 1-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
670 0.00 3.00 3♣* E ♠2 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
|
7 |
♠A3
♥KJ643
♦Q4
♣5432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♦8 8-Loops-Martin vs 7-Modest-Miller
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♦8 9-Dau-Walker vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦2 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
600 0.00 3.00 3N S ♠5 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 1-Hullman-Pender
|
8 |
♠J98654
♥T4
♦KQT
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 ♣9 8-Loops-Martin vs 7-Modest-Miller
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 ♠K 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 1-Hullman-Pender
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ E ♠Q 9-Dau-Walker vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
120 0.00 3.00 2N W ♦K 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
9 |
♠KT4
♥Q2
♦KQ32
♣K872
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♠3 8-Loops-Martin vs 7-Modest-Miller
490 2.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♠3 9-Dau-Walker vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
490 2.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♠3 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 1-Hullman-Pender
500 0.00 3.00 6N* N -3 ♥A 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
10 |
♠AQ75
♥863
♦3
♣KT763
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -4 ♦3 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♦3 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♦3 7-Modest-Miller vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♦3 9-Dau-Walker vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
11 |
♠AQJ
♥J765
♦5
♣AKJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♠3 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♦T 7-Modest-Miller vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ N +1 ♠T 9-Dau-Walker vs 8-Loops-Martin
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♠5 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
|
12 |
♠Q
♥QT763
♦94
♣QT962
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦6 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
430 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣6 7-Modest-Miller vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
430 1.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠6 9-Dau-Walker vs 8-Loops-Martin
430 1.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♣3 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
|
13 |
♠6
♥T964
♦AKT87
♣T76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦7/6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 3.00 0.00 2♠* S ♣A 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
120 1.50 1.50 2N W ♦8 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 7-Modest-Miller
120 1.50 1.50 2N W ♦8 8-Loops-Martin vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♦8 1-Hullman-Pender vs 9-Dau-Walker
|
14 |
♠QJT74
♥Q2
♦-
♣AKJ965
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ ♣2 ♥1/2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 5♣ N ♦A 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 7-Modest-Miller
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 ♥A 1-Hullman-Pender vs 9-Dau-Walker
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 ♥A 8-Loops-Martin vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 ♥Q 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
|
15 |
♠AK
♥J62
♦T52
♣AKT92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♦ 5/4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦4 1-Hullman-Pender vs 9-Dau-Walker
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣8 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 7-Modest-Miller
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣8 8-Loops-Martin vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣8 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
|
16 |
♠AKJ2
♥J95
♦QJT
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 ♠T 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Hullman-Pender
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 ♦2 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 8-Loops-Martin
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ W ♠A 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Modest-Miller
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ E +1 ♣T 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
17 |
♠QJ98
♥8
♦JT83
♣J965
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ S -2 ♥Q 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠Q 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Hullman-Pender
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠Q 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Modest-Miller
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠8 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
18 |
♠AK532
♥J965
♦5
♣T95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥A 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 8-Loops-Martin
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♠7 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Modest-Miller
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♠4 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♣3 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Hullman-Pender
|
19 |
♠K97
♥AKQ842
♦A
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♥ 1/2♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♥6 1-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Modest-Miller
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ N ♦2 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Dau-Walker
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♠A 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣3 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
|
20 |
♠Q92
♥J9
♦Q52
♣AKJT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠J 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠3 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♠4 1-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Modest-Miller
200 0.00 3.00 5♥ S -2 ♠5 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Dau-Walker
|
21 |
♠KJ9863
♥764
♦73
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣9 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 2-Avenmarg-Ray
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣6 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Johnson-Wesolowski
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥5 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Dau-Walker
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ S ♦5 1-Hullman-Pender vs 7-Modest-Miller
|
22 |
♠932
♥AJ973
♦J
♣QJ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S ♥6 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Pender
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♠J 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♠J 7-Modest-Miller vs 9-Dau-Walker
100 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -2 ♥6 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
23 |
♠AQ53
♥72
♦QJT65
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥6 7-Modest-Miller vs 9-Dau-Walker
660 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥5 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Hullman-Pender
660 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥3 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
630 0.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♥6 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
24 |
♠J632
♥AK73
♦A
♣AT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 2♥ 7♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 3N N ♦2 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Pringle-Girouard
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ N ♠T 7-Modest-Miller vs 9-Dau-Walker
110 0.17 2.83 3♣ S ♥8 2-Avenmarg-Ray vs 8-Loops-Martin
|
25 |
♠J98
♥K9
♦AQ73
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.80 1.80 3♣ N ♠T 8-Loops-Martin vs 1-Hullman-Pender
|
26 |
♠A872
♥85
♦K9632
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣0 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 3.00 0.00 4♠* S +1 ♠T 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣A 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 9-Dau-Walker
200 0.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♣A 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 7-Modest-Miller
200 0.50 2.50 5♣* E -1 ♠K 8-Loops-Martin vs 1-Hullman-Pender
|
27 |
♠AT65
♥Q6
♦AJ32
♣Q43
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♠5 10-Spencer-Tainty vs 7-Modest-Miller
130 2.00 1.00 4♣ W ♠A 3-Pringle-Girouard vs 9-Dau-Walker
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣3 8-Loops-Martin vs 1-Hullman-Pender
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♣3 5-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|