1 |
♠J98543
♥J5
♦K73
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5/6♦ 5/6♥ 2/3♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♥ W ♠9 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠8 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
480 0.33 3.67 4♥ W +2 ♠3 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 5-Walker-Kobland
|
2 |
♠K
♥T982
♦AQ82
♣AQJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♠6 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
150 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -3 ♥T 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
150 2.00 2.00 1♥ E -3 ♦4 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 5-Walker-Kobland
|
3 |
♠J974
♥KT4
♦K6
♣AT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4/5 ♦4/5 ♥3/4 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 2♠ S +2 ♦Q 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 5-Walker-Kobland
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♥9 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
110 0.33 3.67 2♠ S ♥5 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
|
4 |
♠KQJ8
♥-
♦A9653
♣AK75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.67 0.33 3N S +3 ♦8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
660 2.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣8 5-Walker-Kobland vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
200 0.33 3.67 6N S -2 ♣T 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
5 |
♠T98763
♥K4
♦T8
♣K72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 4♦ E -2 ♠A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
110 0.33 3.67 2♦ E +1 ♦5 5-Walker-Kobland vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
|
6 |
♠KQ65
♥96
♦543
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2/3♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 2♥ S +2 ♠6 5-Walker-Kobland vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S +1 ♠A 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.33 3.67 6♦ S -2 ♥Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠94
♥JT85
♦AQT65
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.67 0.33 4♥ N +1 ♣4 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Walker-Kobland
140 0.33 3.67 3♠ W ♥J 10-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
8 |
♠65
♥A976
♦KJ
♣AQJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4/5 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.67 0.33 3N N +2 ♣3 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Walker-Kobland
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣2 10-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.33 3.67 3♦ N -1 ♥2 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
9 |
♠AT2
♥3
♦KJT943
♣J73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3♦ N -1 ♥2 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
650 1.17 2.83 5♥ W ♠A 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 5-Walker-Kobland
650 1.17 2.83 4♥ W +1 ♦J 10-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠Q7
♥AT87543
♦AT9
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 3/2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♥ S +1 ♦K 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
650 3.25 0.75 4♥ S +1 ♦K 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ S ♦8 10-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
100 0.13 3.88 6♥ N -1 ♦3 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
11 |
♠KT865
♥KJ82
♦6
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.63 1.38 4♣ S ♠7 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
130 2.63 1.38 3♣ S +1 ♠9 10-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
130 2.63 1.38 3♣ S +1 ♥Q 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.13 3.88 5♣ S -1 ♦3 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
|
12 |
♠A9
♥Q752
♦A98654
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 3.88 0.13 6♦ N ♣5 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
690 2.63 1.38 3N S +3 ♠3 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
600 1.38 2.63 3N S ♣6 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.13 3.88 3♣ S ♥8 10-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
|
13 |
♠QT53
♥T7
♦T63
♣AKT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥4 10-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♥4 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 7-Winham-Stone
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♠9 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♠7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♠7 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Walker-Kobland
|
14 |
♠98743
♥A964
♦A7
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♣A 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♣A 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 7-Winham-Stone
100 2.00 2.00 1N W -2 ♠9 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Walker-Kobland
50 1.00 3.00 1♣ E -1 ♥5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
50 0.00 4.00 2N S -1 ♦5 10-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
15 |
♠965
♥Q
♦AQ984
♣JT94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦5 10-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
150 3.00 1.00 1N E +2 ♥7 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♣6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Walker-Kobland
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♣6 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
16 |
♠J973
♥52
♦AQ72
♣T84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♣K 5-Walker-Kobland vs 7-Winham-Stone
150 3.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♠T 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♣4 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♦5 10-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠KJ75
♥J96
♦A2
♣A843
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦7 5-Walker-Kobland vs 7-Winham-Stone
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♦K 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦K 10-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 ♥5 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♦K 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
|
18 |
♠K764
♥J972
♦72
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣A 5-Walker-Kobland vs 7-Winham-Stone
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♦3 10-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N ♠3 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♦3 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
100 0.00 4.00 2♦ S -1 ♥A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
19 |
♠T98
♥AKT7
♦32
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♥6 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥4 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Winham-Stone
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥2 10-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Walker-Kobland
50 0.50 3.50 5♠ S -1 ♠6 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
50 0.50 3.50 5♠ S -1 ♥9 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
|
20 |
♠654
♥Q986
♦876
♣T63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠6 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠4 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Winham-Stone
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♠6 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♠K 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♠K 10-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Walker-Kobland
|
21 |
♠9542
♥K4
♦4
♣QT8742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣3 NT7/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♣5 1-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Winham-Stone
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♠3 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♥5 10-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Walker-Kobland
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♦8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Loops-Morrissey
100 0.00 4.00 1♦ S -1 ♣5 6-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
22 |
♠K8642
♥T5
♦K97
♣976
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N E -2 ♥8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.63 1.38 1N E -1 ♠3 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
90 0.75 3.25 1N W ♠T 10-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
90 0.75 3.25 1N E ♥8 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
23 |
♠42
♥QJ732
♦AKQ3
♣T7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♠* W -1 ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♦A 10-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♥T 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ W ♦A 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
24 |
♠J942
♥KJ65
♦KQ75
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3♠ S ♣4 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♣4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♦3 10-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Nathanson-Miller
170 0.13 3.88 4♣ E +2 ♠8 2-Loops-Morrissey vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
25 |
♠KQ85
♥A654
♦53
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.67 0.33 2♦ W ♥A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W ♥2 5-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.33 3.67 3♦ W +1 ♣3 10-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
26 |
♠-
♥QT942
♦AJ9876
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥3/2 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 4♠* E -1 ♦Q 5-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.17 2.83 4♠ E -1 ♥A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.17 2.83 3♠ W -1 ♦Q 10-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
27 |
♠82
♥765
♦KT76
♣AK83
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3♠ E +2 ♦2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stolzberg-Riley
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦9 10-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
480 0.33 3.67 4♠ W +2 ♣6 5-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|