1 |
♠9
♥AJ72
♦A984
♣A852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦3 7-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -2 ♠J 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦2 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♥7 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♠9 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
2 |
♠T64
♥AQT87
♦KQ86
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5/4♦ 5/4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠A 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠A 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠2 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Harken-Tainty
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ S +1 ♦5 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ S +1 ♣3 7-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
|
3 |
♠A
♥QT8543
♦QJ9
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠7 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠7 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♦T 7-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♦T 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 ♦T 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
|
4 |
♠K87
♥743
♦T5
♣QT953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♦3 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
120 2.00 2.00 2N S ♥8 7-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♥J 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♥T 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♥8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
|
5 |
♠A653
♥63
♦65
♣QJ872
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♥5 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
110 3.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠J 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 7-Allen-Formoso
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♦6 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥2 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 5-Harken-Tainty
300 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -3 ♥Q 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
|
6 |
♠J86
♥Q873
♦74
♣Q632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2/1NT ♣6/5 ♥5/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♦J 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 7-Allen-Formoso
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -2 ♦J 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -2 ♦5 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 5-Harken-Tainty
150 0.50 3.50 1N E +2 ♠5 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
150 0.50 3.50 1N E +2 ♠5 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
7 |
♠T873
♥3
♦8653
♣KQJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ W +1 ♥3 7-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
660 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♠3 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
690 2.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♣K 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Harken-Tainty
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +3 ♥3 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
1440 0.00 4.00 6N W ♦3 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
|
8 |
♠AJ
♥A876
♦AK4
♣K642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠8 7-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♠4 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Harken-Tainty
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♠4 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♠4 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣Q 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
9 |
♠Q97
♥T93
♦J743
♣A94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♦3 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Allen-Formoso
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♦3 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♦7 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♦3 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ E ♦8 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 5-Harken-Tainty
|
10 |
♠K98
♥J92
♦AQ43
♣T64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT4/3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♦7 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 5-Harken-Tainty
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♥A 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 7-Allen-Formoso
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♥A 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦J 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♦J 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
|
11 |
♠QJ7
♥J763
♦854
♣Q84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥5 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
400 3.00 1.00 5♣ S ♠9 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
180 2.00 2.00 1N S +3 ♦6 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♥5 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Allen-Formoso
|
12 |
♠J98
♥AKJT983
♦9
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣5 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠2 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N ♠7 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N ♠7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Allen-Formoso
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠7 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
|
13 |
♠J9
♥732
♦J873
♣6543
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 ♠K 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♠K 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♠7 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 5-Harken-Tainty
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦Q 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠K 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 7-Allen-Formoso
|
14 |
♠A632
♥7
♦9653
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ W ♥7 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 5-Harken-Tainty
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥7 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues vs 7-Allen-Formoso
|
15 |
♠9
♥AJ85
♦AQ73
♣K764
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣4 ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W ♣7 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣4 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +3 ♦4 7-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
|
16 |
♠Q2
♥K32
♦6542
♣T763
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ -/4NT ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠4/6 NT6/10 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -2 ♣7 4-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Nelson-Hartmann
130 2.50 1.50 4♣ S ♠3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
130 2.50 1.50 4♣ S ♦A 7-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 2-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Elkins-Raphael
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
17 |
♠AQJ9
♥KQ32
♦K865
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 5♦ 7♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♥ S +1 ♣6 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
980 3.00 1.00 6♥ S ♠2 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Allen-Formoso
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +3 ♦Q 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +3 ♣3 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
490 0.00 4.00 4N S +2 ♥4 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
18 |
♠AKT
♥AT
♦7542
♣QJ54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♦K 10-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Allen-Formoso
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♠K 3-Nelson-Hartmann vs 9-Avenmarg-GUMZ
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♥8 8-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Corgiat-Rodrigues
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 ♦J 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Pringle-Vadas
|