1 |
♠97654
♥QJ7
♦QT42
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1/2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -1 ♣Q 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ W ♣Q 10-Winham-Stone vs 8-Loops-Miller
400 1.38 2.63 5♣ E ♠A 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
430 0.13 3.88 3N E +1 ♦8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Cowen-Brown
|
2 |
♠987
♥KJ9842
♦AT
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1/2♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2N W -2 ♠9 10-Winham-Stone vs 8-Loops-Miller
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Cowen-Brown
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥7 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
430 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♥8 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
3 |
♠KJ9873
♥AKQ7
♦-
♣A62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥2 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 4♥ S ♠5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Cowen-Brown
100 2.63 1.38 1♠ E -1 ♥3 10-Winham-Stone vs 8-Loops-Miller
50 1.38 2.63 2♠ N -1 ♦K 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -2 ♦K 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
4 |
♠AKQ73
♥9
♦AQJT9
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣2/3 ♥2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 3♦ N +2 ♥A 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
200 2.63 1.38 4♠* N -1 ♥A 8-Loops-Miller vs 4-McDuff-Chase
500 1.38 2.63 4♠ N -5 ♥A 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
1600 0.13 3.88 4♠** N -3 ♥A 5-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
5 |
♠J87542
♥Q54
♦K
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +2 ♥A 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ N ♥A 5-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.13 3.88 3♥ E -1 ♠A 8-Loops-Miller vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
6 |
♠AJ62
♥Q92
♦96
♣JT62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -1 ♦9 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -1 ♦9 5-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
140 0.75 3.25 3♥ W ♦9 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.75 3.25 3♥ W ♦9 8-Loops-Miller vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
7 |
♠954
♥AK84
♦J2
♣AQ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♥6 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-McDuff-Chase
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♦7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ N ♦7 10-Winham-Stone vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
600 0.13 3.88 3N N ♦4 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Cowen-Brown
|
8 |
♠AJ9
♥K96
♦AK963
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.25 0.75 3N N +1 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
430 3.25 0.75 3N N +1 ♦Q 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Cowen-Brown
90 1.38 2.63 1N N ♠K 10-Winham-Stone vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
50 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♠K 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
9 |
♠T642
♥QJT
♦T95
♣A53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 3N W -3 ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
90 2.63 1.38 1N W ♠2 10-Winham-Stone vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
600 1.38 2.63 3N W ♠2 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Cowen-Brown
630 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♥Q 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
10 |
♠QJT6
♥KT42
♦62
♣J63
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-NT ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♣ W -1 ♦6 10-Winham-Stone vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.38 2.63 3♥ N -1 ♣9 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -1 ♠A 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 4-McDuff-Chase
100 1.38 2.63 3♦ S -1 ♣K 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Miller
|
11 |
♠K8
♥AJT962
♦K4
♣AK4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1/2♦ 4/5♥ -/1♠ 1/4NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +3 ♣9 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Miller
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ N +1 ♥5 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ N ♥5 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 4-McDuff-Chase
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ N ♣4 10-Winham-Stone vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
12 |
♠-
♥KQT6432
♦KT5
♣863
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +1 ♣2 10-Winham-Stone vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
630 2.63 1.38 3N S +1 ♠2 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Miller
100 0.75 3.25 6N S -1 ♠7 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 4-McDuff-Chase
100 0.75 3.25 5♥ N -1 ♠4 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠KJT84
♥862
♦Q
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥3/4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♠A 4-McDuff-Chase vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠A 8-Loops-Miller vs 5-Cowen-Brown
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♠A 10-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♦8 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
14 |
♠KJ82
♥42
♦3
♣AJ9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♥4 8-Loops-Miller vs 5-Cowen-Brown
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ E -2 ♥A 10-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -4 ♦A 4-McDuff-Chase vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AT6542
♥K
♦KJ
♣Q963
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣3/2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥A 8-Loops-Miller vs 5-Cowen-Brown
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥2 10-Winham-Stone vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.00 3.00 5♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 4-McDuff-Chase vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠2
♥9542
♦9542
♣A752
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -4 ♦9 5-Cowen-Brown vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♠2 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ W +1 ♣A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Miller
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♦3 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
180 0.00 4.00 2N E +2 ♦3 10-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
17 |
♠42
♥K9643
♦97432
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 5♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
440 4.00 0.00 5♣ W +2 ♥5 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
520 3.00 1.00 4N E +3 ♠3 5-Cowen-Brown vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
1020 1.50 2.50 6N E +1 ♠7 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Miller
1020 1.50 2.50 6N E +1 ♠3 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
1520 0.00 4.00 7N E ♠3 10-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
18 |
♠A74
♥K7
♦KJ873
♣AT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♦9 10-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Chase
180 3.00 1.00 1N N +3 ♦A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
180 3.00 1.00 1N N +3 ♦9 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 3.00 2N N +1 ♦2 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Miller
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♣7 5-Cowen-Brown vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
|
19 |
♠KT8
♥AQJ9
♦A963
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 ♥8 10-Winham-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Brown
90 2.50 1.50 1N N ♣T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Loops-Miller
90 2.50 1.50 1N N ♣9 4-McDuff-Chase vs 9-Harken-Harken
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♥2 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
|
20 |
♠Q7653
♥T54
♦Q8
♣J87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3/2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 4-McDuff-Chase vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +2 ♥K 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Loops-Miller
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♦9 10-Winham-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Brown
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♦A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ W -1 ♣7 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
|
21 |
♠T765
♥5
♦AQJT
♣A832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠T 4-McDuff-Chase vs 9-Harken-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠5 1-Graves-Rodrigues vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠5 10-Winham-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Brown
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♠5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Loops-Miller
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
22 |
♠JT943
♥Q9874
♦5
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦1 NT2 |
EW: 6♦ 5/4NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ W +1 ♠A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Loops-Miller
500 3.00 1.00 4♠* N -3 ♥A 4-McDuff-Chase vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
640 2.00 2.00 5♦ E +2 ♠A 5-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣2 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
720 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 ♣K 10-Winham-Stone vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠A74
♥T86
♦K6432
♣74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥6 4-McDuff-Chase vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣6 5-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥5 10-Winham-Stone vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦6 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Loops-Miller
|
24 |
♠J3
♥T96
♦AQ86543
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 5♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 5-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
100 3.00 1.00 5♦ S -2 ♠A 4-McDuff-Chase vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Loops-Miller
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣A 10-Winham-Stone vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♦3 7-Reiss-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
25 |
♠J9654
♥93
♦Q7
♣QT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 4♠ S ♦A 10-Winham-Stone vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣J 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Harken-Harken
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣J 8-Loops-Miller vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
100 0.13 3.88 4♥ W -1 ♦Q 5-Cowen-Brown vs 4-McDuff-Chase
|
26 |
♠864
♥J9752
♦AT9
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N S +1 ♠7 10-Winham-Stone vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ S ♠T 5-Cowen-Brown vs 4-McDuff-Chase
90 1.38 2.63 1N S ♠T 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 0.13 3.88 2♣ S -1 ♠7 8-Loops-Miller vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
|
27 |
♠QT42
♥AT
♦985
♣J653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4/5 NT4/5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 ♥A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 2.63 1.38 4♥ S -2 ♦6 5-Cowen-Brown vs 4-McDuff-Chase
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ E ♥K 8-Loops-Miller vs 1-Graves-Rodrigues
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ E ♥K 10-Winham-Stone vs 7-Reiss-Kobland
|