1 |
♠T3
♥A
♦73
♣AKJ97654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4NT ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 1.17 5♣ N -1 ♥6 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
50 2.83 1.17 5♣ N -1 ♦4 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
200 0.33 3.67 6♠ S -4 ♥7 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
2 |
♠A852
♥J82
♦QT432
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 5♣ E -1 ♥5 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
430 1.17 2.83 3N W +1 ♦2 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
430 1.17 2.83 3N E +1 ♥7 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
3 |
♠A4
♥Q4
♦J9
♣KT97654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.67 0.33 3N S +1 ♥3 7-Winham-Stone vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♠J 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
300 0.33 3.67 6♦* S -2 ♥9 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
4 |
♠J9762
♥AQ
♦AQ64
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.67 0.33 2♦ E -3 ♠K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Brown-Cowen
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♠6 1-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
140 0.33 3.67 2♥ W +1 ♣6 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
5 |
♠Q97
♥T6
♦J95
♣AJ864
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2/3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.67 0.33 3N S +1 ♥2 1-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
180 2.00 2.00 1N S +3 ♥2 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Brown-Cowen
130 0.33 3.67 3♣ S +1 ♠J 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
6 |
♠JT42
♥53
♦J86
♣8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♠3 1-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Brown-Cowen
170 2.00 2.00 1♥ S +3 ♣A 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
7 |
♠K75
♥AQ
♦K754
♣7653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.67 0.33 4♥* W -4 ♣3 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Davidson-Downing
870 2.00 2.00 3♣* S +1 ♥J 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
200 0.33 3.67 3N N -2 ♦9 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
8 |
♠K9875
♥JT9
♦KT3
♣A6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 4/5♦ 3/4♥ 1/3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3N W -1 ♠9 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Davidson-Downing
460 1.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♠7 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
460 1.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♥J 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
9 |
♠K2
♥T984
♦AQT8
♣T84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1/2♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2N W -1 ♥T 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♦8 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Davidson-Downing
110 0.33 3.67 1♠ E +1 ♣6 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
|
10 |
♠J2
♥AK9
♦954
♣AJ984
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 2♥ S +2 ♠3 1-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
170 3.25 0.75 2♥ S +2 ♣K 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Brown-Cowen
140 1.38 2.63 1♥ S +2 ♣K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 2♥ S -1 ♠3 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
11 |
♠K96
♥Q9862
♦86
♣Q54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3♠ E -1 ♦2 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
120 2.63 1.38 2N E ♦4 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Brown-Cowen
150 0.75 3.25 1N E +2 ♦4 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.75 3.25 2♦ S -3 ♣2 1-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
|
12 |
♠J8743
♥AJ98
♦9
♣832
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♠ N +1 ♦K 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-Brown-Cowen
100 2.63 1.38 3♥ S -1 ♦3 1-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
150 1.38 2.63 3♦ E +2 ♠A 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
200 0.13 3.88 4♠* N -1 ♦K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠J2
♥Q432
♦T4
♣Q6532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ E ♠A 1-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♠A 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠J 4-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
300 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -3 ♣J 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠A 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
14 |
♠AKQ8
♥J87543
♦94
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦A 1-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
480 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦K 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
300 0.50 3.50 5♦* E -2 ♥A 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Winham-Stone
300 0.50 3.50 5♦* E -2 ♥A 4-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
|
15 |
♠QT5
♥J2
♦AQ73
♣KQJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♣6/7 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♠3 4-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♠3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♠3 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
50 1.00 3.00 1♥ E -1 ♣K 1-Davidson-Downing vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 ♠3 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
16 |
♠KQ73
♥52
♦9852
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♥4 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♠9 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠3 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Downing
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♥6 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Brown-Cowen
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
17 |
♠A
♥J832
♦J75
♣KT432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♣3 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Downing
210 3.00 1.00 2N E +3 ♣9 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Brown-Cowen
230 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +4 ♣4 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Winham-Stone
490 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♣9 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠KQ643
♥K972
♦7
♣J84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ W ♠6 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ E ♥Q 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Downing
150 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +3 ♥Q 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Brown-Cowen
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♠K 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Winham-Stone
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥Q 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠9864
♥42
♦AK5432
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥0 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 3.50 0.50 3N S +4 ♠J 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
520 3.50 0.50 3N S +4 ♠3 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
480 1.50 2.50 5♥ S +1 ♣6 1-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +2 ♦6 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.00 4.00 5♥ S ♣5 4-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
20 |
♠A953
♥972
♦JT954
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♦J 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♣8 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦4 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦2 4-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♣8 1-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
21 |
♠A8
♥AT8763
♦Q53
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2/1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣7 4-Brown-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♠6 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
200 2.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♣6 1-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Winham-Stone
300 1.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♠2 6-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♠9 3-Nathanson-Miller vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
22 |
♠J7
♥AQ92
♦Q54
♣J762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♥ E -2 ♦8 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.63 1.38 2♠ S -2 ♥J 4-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
130 0.75 3.25 4♦ W ♠J 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
130 0.75 3.25 3♦ W +1 ♠J 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠A62
♥KJ43
♦K432
♣T2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4/3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.88 0.13 5♥* W -4 ♦2 4-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
630 2.63 1.38 3N S +1 ♠6 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
600 1.38 2.63 3N N ♠4 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.13 3.88 2♦ S +1 ♠7 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
24 |
♠T9632
♥QT8
♦KJ4
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 2♦ S ♣5 4-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Nathanson-Miller
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♦8 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.38 2.63 2N E ♦8 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pringle-Vadas
130 0.13 3.88 2♣ E +2 ♠A 7-Winham-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
25 |
♠-
♥AKQT875
♦K853
♣A7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 3.67 0.33 6♥ N +1 ♣6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Davidson-Downing
510 1.17 2.83 5♥ N +2 ♣3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Brown-Cowen
510 1.17 2.83 4♥ N +3 ♠3 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
26 |
♠T832
♥4
♦AT84
♣J962
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 7♥ 5/6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.67 0.33 4♥ W +1 ♠2 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Brown-Cowen
1460 1.17 2.83 6♥ W +1 ♦A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Davidson-Downing
1460 1.17 2.83 6♥ W +1 ♦A 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Winham-Stone
|
27 |
♠J872
♥A98542
♦3
♣T3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.67 0.33 5♠ W ♦3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Davidson-Downing
520 2.00 2.00 3N W +4 ♥5 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Winham-Stone
990 0.33 3.67 6N W ♣3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Brown-Cowen
|