1 |
♠K8
♥T742
♦AK6
♣9842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1/2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.90 0.10 4♥ E -3 ♣5 9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
50 3.70 1.30 3♥ W -1 ♦A 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
400 1.90 3.10 3N W ♥2 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
400 1.90 3.10 3N W ♣9 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
460 0.10 4.90 5N E ♣8 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠T43
♥7
♦982
♣J96543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 7♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.90 0.10 1N W +3 ♦5 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
480 3.10 1.90 4♥ E +2 ♦5 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
480 3.10 1.90 4♥ E +2 ♣K 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
510 1.30 3.70 4♥ W +3 ♣6 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
940 0.10 4.90 6♦ E +1 ♣K 9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
|
3 |
♠JT4
♥J5
♦AQ854
♣743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 3♦ N -2 ♣T 9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
120 3.70 1.30 1N W +1 ♦5 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
180 2.50 2.50 1N W +3 ♦6 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.30 3.70 4♥ E ♣6 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
630 0.10 4.90 3N W +1 ♦4 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
4 |
♠AQJ64
♥J4
♦A9762
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 4♣ E -2 ♦Q 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
140 3.70 1.30 2♠ N +1 ♣A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ N +1 ♣A 9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
110 1.30 3.70 3♦ N ♣A 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
100 0.10 4.90 3♦ N -1 ♣A 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠KJT94
♥T763
♦KJ
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.70 1.30 2♠ N +1 ♦A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
140 3.70 1.30 2♠ N +1 ♣J 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
140 3.70 1.30 2♠ N +1 ♣J 9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
110 1.30 3.70 2♠ N ♣J 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
100 0.10 4.90 3♠ N -1 ♥K 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
6 |
♠KQT6
♥T94
♦KT8
♣Q62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 2♣ W -1 ♦8 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
90 3.10 1.90 1N W ♥T 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
90 3.10 1.90 1N E ♦2 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
120 0.70 4.30 1N W +1 ♠6 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
120 0.70 4.30 1N E +1 ♦2 9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
7 |
♠K9
♥AQ97
♦KJ973
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/3NT ♣5/6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.30 0.70 4♦ N ♥T 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
130 4.30 0.70 3♦ N +1 ♥4 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦4 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.70 4.30 2♠ E ♦8 2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
110 0.70 4.30 2♥ W ♦9 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
8 |
♠5
♥9743
♦854
♣Q9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.90 0.10 2♠ W ♣5 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
420 3.70 1.30 4♠ W ♠5 2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
450 1.90 3.10 4♠ W +1 ♥9 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
450 1.90 3.10 4♠ W +1 ♣4 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
480 0.10 4.90 4♠ W +2 ♣4 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
|
9 |
♠AJ75
♥AK8652
♦832
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ ♣0 ♦1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4/5♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.90 0.10 4♥ N ♦A 2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
200 3.70 1.30 5♣ E -2 ♥3 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
170 2.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♠T 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
750 1.30 3.70 5♣* W ♥Q 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
1150 0.10 4.90 5♣* E +2 ♥3 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
10 |
♠Q8732
♥-
♦8542
♣K987
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +2 ♥A 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +2 ♥A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
680 3.70 1.30 4♠ N +2 ♥3 2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
230 1.30 3.70 3♠ S +3 ♥A 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
210 0.10 4.90 1N S +4 ♥K 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
|
11 |
♠JT52
♥T642
♦KQ
♣942
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6/5 ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.90 0.10 3♥ S ♠8 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
50 2.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠7 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♦4 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♣J 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.10 4.90 4♥ S -2 ♣J 2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
|
12 |
♠K52
♥86
♦A943
♣7432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.70 1.30 4♥ E -2 ♠A 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 3.70 1.30 4♥ E -2 ♦T 2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
100 3.70 1.30 4♥ E -2 ♦T 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.30 3.70 3♥ E ♠T 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
630 0.10 4.90 3♥* E +1 ♦T 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
13 |
♠92
♥KQ87
♦AJ843
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 2/1♥ ♦7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
360 4.90 0.10 1♠* S +1 ♣A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
200 3.70 1.30 3♣ W -2 ♠9 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
PASS 1.90 3.10 Pass Out 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
PASS 1.90 3.10 Pass Out 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 0.10 4.90 1♠ S -1 ♥3 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
|
14 |
♠AQ
♥A854
♦AT54
♣J53
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 2♥ N -2 ♦J 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
110 3.70 1.30 2♠ E ♦A 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
150 2.50 2.50 3♦ S -3 ♠5 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
200 1.30 3.70 3♦ S -4 ♠T 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
500 0.10 4.90 3♦* S -3 ♠5 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
|
15 |
♠964
♥T63
♦QT83
♣T83
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.30 0.70 4♦ E -1 ♥A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
50 4.30 0.70 3♦ E -1 ♥A 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
90 2.50 2.50 2♦ E ♥A 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
110 1.30 3.70 3♦ E ♥A 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
400 0.10 4.90 2N S -4 ♠3 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
|
16 |
♠8
♥AT83
♦T74
♣KJ975
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.50 0.50 3♦ S +2 ♠2 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
150 4.50 0.50 2♦ S +3 ♥Q 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♠A 2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♠A 8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 1.00 4.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
50 0.00 5.00 5♦ S -1 ♠A 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
|
17 |
♠KQJ84
♥9853
♦T6
♣JT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 5/4♥ 2NT ♣3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 5♥ E -2 ♠A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣K 8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ E ♦4 2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ E ♦4 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ E +2 ♦Q 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
420 0.00 5.00 4♥ E ♣K 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
|
18 |
♠8
♥QJ65
♦AQJ4
♣T743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -4 ♠8 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
130 4.00 1.00 2♦ S +2 ♠5 8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♣8 1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♣2 2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ N +1 ♥7 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ W -2 ♥5 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
|
19 |
♠AKT6432
♥K62
♦7
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2NT ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♥5 2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ N ♦K 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♥5 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N ♦K 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♣5 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ E ♦Q 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
20 |
♠AQ8
♥KQT2
♦KQJ9
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠2 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣A 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣A 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣5 2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
200 1.00 4.00 2♥ N +3 ♣4 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
170 0.00 5.00 2♥ N +2 ♣5 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
21 |
♠KT
♥974
♦AK632
♣Q86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♦T 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
110 3.50 1.50 1♠ S +1 ♥A 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
110 3.50 1.50 1♠ S +1 ♥A 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
90 2.00 3.00 1N N ♥2 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♦T 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
400 0.00 5.00 3N N -4 ♥2 2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
|
22 |
♠Q86
♥QT532
♦T75
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5/4 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 2♦ S +1 ♥8 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
110 4.50 0.50 2♦ S +1 ♥8 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
100 3.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦K 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
90 1.50 3.50 2♦ S ♥8 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
90 1.50 3.50 2♦ S ♥8 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 5.00 2♦ S -1 ♥8 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
|
23 |
♠A85432
♥Q4
♦84
♣AT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N N ♣5 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠K 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
130 3.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 ♠K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ N ♥9 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠7 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♦3 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
24 |
♠T
♥QT84
♦K65
♣J9876
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠4 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
120 4.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♠2 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
150 3.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♠3 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
210 2.00 3.00 1N E +4 ♠4 6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
400 1.00 4.00 3N E ♠5 10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
460 0.00 5.00 3N E +2 ♠4 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
25 |
♠J7
♥KJ84
♦T52
♣T875
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.70 1.30 1♠ S +3 ♦4 2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
170 3.70 1.30 2♥ S +2 ♦4 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
170 3.70 1.30 2♥ S +2 ♦4 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
140 0.70 4.30 1♠ S +2 ♦4 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
140 0.70 4.30 1♠ S +2 ♦4 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
|
26 |
♠876
♥A862
♦AJ43
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 3N W -2 ♥2 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
100 3.70 1.30 3N W -1 ♥8 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
110 2.50 2.50 3♣ E ♥5 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
120 0.70 4.30 1N E +1 ♠3 2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
120 0.70 4.30 1N E +1 ♠3 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
|
27 |
♠932
♥AJ5
♦KQ2
♣AKT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.90 0.10 1N N +3 ♣Q 2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
150 3.10 1.90 2N N +1 ♣5 7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
150 3.10 1.90 1N N +2 ♣6 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
130 1.30 3.70 2♦ S +2 ♠A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
110 0.10 4.90 3♦ S ♠A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
|