? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Richard Pearce - Susan Pearce 61.58 1st A 0.96
Barbara Tidmore - Judy Osborn 58.92 2nd A 0.67
Cathy Foy - Daphne Morrissey 54.92 3rd A 0.48
Kathy Stone - Matthew Nathanson 54.00 4th A 0.34
Craig Smart - Sam O'Neill 53.75 5th A 0.19
EVENT>Monday Evening 499er Pair|SESSION>Monday Eve   |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 5, 2024     |CLUB NO.>137059    | 08/05/2024 21:10
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Carol Avenmarg  |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   60.0 |TOP>   5 |MP LIMITS>500/300/100    |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=10/C=6                     ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Kathy Stone            Matthew Nathanson        C    4     4     .     64.80  54.00  0.34(A) 
 2 Jim Miller             Nancy Pringle            B    .     .     .     62.90  52.42          
 3 Sam O'Neill            Craig Smart              C    5     .     .     64.50  53.75  0.19(A) 
 4 Richard Pearce         Susan Pearce             C    1     1     1     73.90  61.58  0.96(A) 
 5 Tony Nelson            Shamim Formoso           B    .     .     .     52.50  43.75          
 6 Edna Elkins            Francine Raphael         B    .     .     .     56.50  47.08          
 7 Cathy Foy              Daphne Morrissey         C    3     3     2     65.90  54.92  0.48(A) 
 8 Janet Loops            Lester Loops             A    .     .     .     56.50  47.08          
 9 David Harken           Chris Tainty             A    .     .     .     45.00  37.50          
10 Mary Graves            JONDI GUMZ               C    .     .     .     61.90  51.58          
11 Barbara Rodrigues      Dianne Corgiat           C    .     .     .     44.90  37.42          
12 Judy Osborn            Barbara Tidmore          B    2     2     .     70.70  58.92  0.67(A) 
                                          Totals                         720.00       

1 ♠K8
T742
AK6
♣9842
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠A3
KQ98
QJ95
♣K73
♠Q9765
63
7
♣AQJT6
♠JT42
AJ5
T8432
♣5
10
159
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1  ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 1/2 2♠ 2/3NT  ♦5
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -300 4*-N-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.90   0.10  4 E -3   ♣5  9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
   50          3.70   1.30  3 W -1   A  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
        400    1.90   3.10  3N W      2  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
        400    1.90   3.10  3N W      ♣9  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
        460    0.10   4.90  5N E      ♣8  8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
2 ♠T43
7
982
♣J96543
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠K87
AKJ65
QJT43
♣-
♠AQ9
8432
AK76
♣A7
♠J652
QT9
5
♣KQT82
1
1417
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0
EW: 7 7 6♠ 7NT  ♣6
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: -1520 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        180    4.90   0.10  1N W +3   5  8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        480    3.10   1.90  4 E +2   5  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
        480    3.10   1.90  4 E +2   ♣K  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
        510    1.30   3.70  4 W +3   ♣6  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
        940    0.10   4.90  6 E +1   ♣K  9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
3 ♠JT4
J5
AQ854
♣743
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K83
AQ4
KJ32
♣KJ8
♠762
9632
T
♣AQT92
♠AQ95
KT87
976
♣65
8
176
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 2 2NT  ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    4.90   0.10  3 N -2   ♣T  9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
        120    3.70   1.30  1N W +1   5  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Miller-Pringle
        180    2.50   2.50  1N W +3   6  8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        620    1.30   3.70  4 E      ♣6  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
        630    0.10   4.90  3N W +1   4  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
4 ♠AQJ64
J4
A9762
♣5
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠983
853
T43
♣Q974
♠K75
QT72
K
♣AKT63
♠T2
AK96
QJ85
♣J82
12
215
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 3 5♠ 2NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.90   0.10  4♣ E -2   Q  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  140          3.70   1.30  2♠ N +1   ♣A  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
  130          2.50   2.50  3 N +1   ♣A  9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
  110          1.30   3.70  3 N      ♣A  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
        100    0.10   4.90  3 N -1   ♣A  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
5 ♠KJT94
T763
KJ
♣AQ
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A
A8542
Q53
♣8632
♠872
KQ
AT92
♣JT97
♠Q653
J9
8764
♣K54
14
1010
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT6
EW: 3♣ 2 1  ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.70   1.30  2♠ N +1   A  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
  140          3.70   1.30  2♠ N +1   ♣J  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
  140          3.70   1.30  2♠ N +1   ♣J  9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
  110          1.30   3.70  2♠ N      ♣J  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
        100    0.10   4.90  3♠ N -1   K  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
6 ♠KQT6
T94
KT8
♣Q62
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J432
AQ
643
♣AK75
♠75
J6532
AQ9
♣J98
♠A98
K87
J752
♣T43
10
148
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1 2 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -110 2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.90   0.10  2♣ W -1   8  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 8-Loops-Loops
         90    3.10   1.90  1N W      T  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Miller-Pringle
         90    3.10   1.90  1N E      2  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
        120    0.70   4.30  1N W +1   ♠6  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        120    0.70   4.30  1N E +1   2  9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
7 ♠K9
AQ97
KJ973
♣76
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠54
KJ632
Q
♣A9854
♠AT8732
T84
AT
♣JT
♠QJ6
5
86542
♣KQ32
13
109
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2/3NT  ♣5/6 ♥4 ♠5
EW: 1♣ 2 1♠  ♦3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +500 4*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          4.30   0.70  4 N      T  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
  130          4.30   0.70  3 N +1   4  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  100          2.50   2.50  3♠ E -1   4  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        110    0.70   4.30  2♠ E      8  2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
        110    0.70   4.30  2 W      9  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
8 ♠5
9743
854
♣Q9542
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T87632
AJ6
K9
♣AK
♠AK9
52
A632
♣T873
♠QJ4
KQT8
QJT7
♣J6
2
1511
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2
EW: 3♣ 3 2 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    4.90   0.10  2♠ W      ♣5  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        420    3.70   1.30  4♠ W      ♠5  2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
        450    1.90   3.10  4♠ W +1   9  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
        450    1.90   3.10  4♠ W +1   ♣4  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
        480    0.10   4.90  4♠ W +2   ♣4  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
9 ♠AJ75
AK8652
832
♣-
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q
-
KT97654
♣KT742
♠T984
JT7
A
♣AQ963
♠K632
Q943
QJ
♣J85
12
811
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3♠  ♣0 ♦1 NT1
EW: 6♣ 4/5  ♥3 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 22 - 20 = +2
Par: -300 6*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          4.90   0.10  4 N      A  2-Miller-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  200          3.70   1.30  5♣ E -2   3  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
  170          2.50   2.50  3 N +1   ♠T  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Loops-Loops
        750    1.30   3.70  5♣* W     Q  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
       1150    0.10   4.90  5♣* E +2  3  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
10 ♠Q8732
-
8542
♣K987
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T9
AKT976
JT3
♣J4
♠J6
Q5432
Q6
♣6532
♠AK54
J8
AK97
♣AQT
5
95
21
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 6 6♠ 1NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦1 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +1430 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          3.70   1.30  4♠ S +2   A  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
  680          3.70   1.30  4♠ S +2   A  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
  680          3.70   1.30  4♠ N +2   3  2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  230          1.30   3.70  3♠ S +3   A  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  210          0.10   4.90  1N S +4   K  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
11 ♠JT52
T642
KQ
♣942
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠8743
K73
9764
♣KJ
♠Q96
8
AT832
♣A763
♠AK
AQJ95
J5
♣QT85
6
710
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣6/5 ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5
EW: 3 1♠  ♣6 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.90   0.10  3 S      ♠8  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
         50    2.50   2.50  4 S -1   ♠7  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
         50    2.50   2.50  3 S -1   4  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
         50    2.50   2.50  3 S -1   ♣J  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        100    0.10   4.90  4 S -2   ♣J  2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
12 ♠K52
86
A943
♣7432
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠863
7
KQ8765
♣QJ5
♠94
AKQJT943
J2
♣K
♠AQJT7
52
T
♣AT986
7
814
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT5
EW: 2 2  ♣3 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.70   1.30  4 E -2   ♠A  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  100          3.70   1.30  4 E -2   T  2-Miller-Pringle vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  100          3.70   1.30  4 E -2   T  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        140    1.30   3.70  3 E      ♠T  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
        630    0.10   4.90  3* E +1  T  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
13 ♠92
KQ87
AJ843
♣52
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠653
T52
K6
♣AKJ96
♠KJ7
AJ94
QT75
♣T7
♠AQT84
63
92
♣Q843
10
1111
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5
EW: 2♣ 1/- 2/1
       ♦7/6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -110 2-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  360          4.90   0.10  1♠* S +1  ♣A  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
  200          3.70   1.30  3♣ W -2   ♠9  9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
    PASS       1.90   3.10  Pass Out      3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
    PASS       1.90   3.10  Pass Out      7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
        100    0.10   4.90  1♠ S -1   3  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
14 ♠AQ
A854
AT54
♣J53
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠T75
QJ96
6
♣K8642
♠KJ432
KT
KQJ3
♣T9
♠986
732
9872
♣AQ7
15
613
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 1 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    4.90   0.10  2 N -2   J  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
        110    3.70   1.30  2♠ E      A  9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
        150    2.50   2.50  3 S -3   ♠5  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
        200    1.30   3.70  3 S -4   ♠T  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
        500    0.10   4.90  3* S -3  ♠5  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
15 ♠964
T63
QT83
♣T83
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠KQ532
Q9752
-
♣974
♠J7
4
AKJ9542
♣A52
♠AT8
AKJ8
76
♣KQJ6
2
713
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/5
EW: 1 1 1♠  ♣6 NT6
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          4.30   0.70  4 E -1   A  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
   50          4.30   0.70  3 E -1   A  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Loops-Loops
         90    2.50   2.50  2 E      A  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
        110    1.30   3.70  3 E      A  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
        400    0.10   4.90  2N S -4   ♠3  9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
16 ♠8
AT83
T74
♣KJ975
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A932
QJ62
92
♣AT3
♠KQJ54
K95
83
♣842
♠T76
74
AKQJ65
♣Q6
8
119
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1NT  ♥6 ♠4
EW: 1 2♠  ♣2 ♦2 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          4.50   0.50  3 S +2   ♠2  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  150          4.50   0.50  2 S +3   Q  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
  130          2.50   2.50  3 S +1   ♠A  2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
  130          2.50   2.50  3 S +1   ♠A  8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
  100          1.00   4.00  4♠ E -1   A  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
         50    0.00   5.00  5 S -1   ♠A  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
17 ♠KQJ84
9853
T6
♣JT
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠9
AQT2
9532
♣9854
♠7653
KJ764
AK7
♣A
♠AT2
-
QJ84
♣KQ7632
7
615
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦4 ♥2 NT5
EW: 2 5/4 2NT  ♣3 ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -450 5-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          5.00   0.00  5 E -2   ♠A  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
   50          4.00   1.00  4♠ E -1   ♣K  8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
        140    2.50   2.50  3 E      4  2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
        140    2.50   2.50  3 E      4  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
        200    1.00   4.00  3 E +2   Q  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
        420    0.00   5.00  4 E      ♣K  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
18 ♠8
QJ65
AQJ4
♣T743
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠Q965
AT42
T76
♣82
♠AJ72
K87
53
♣KJ96
♠KT43
93
K982
♣AQ5
10
612
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1 2NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦3 ♥5/6 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          5.00   0.00  3 W -4   ♠8  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  130          4.00   1.00  2 S +2   ♠5  8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
  110          2.00   3.00  2 S +1   ♣8  1-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  110          2.00   3.00  2 S +1   ♣2  2-Miller-Pringle vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
  110          2.00   3.00  2 N +1   7  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  100          0.00   5.00  2♠ W -2   5  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
19 ♠AKT6432
K62
7
♣63
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J97
AJ9
A952
♣QJT
♠Q85
QT5
KT
♣K8754
♠-
8743
QJ8643
♣A92
10
1310
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♥6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 3/2NT  ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -300 4♠*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          5.00   0.00  2♠ N +2   5  2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
  140          4.00   1.00  3♠ N      K  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  110          2.50   2.50  2♠ N      5  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  110          2.50   2.50  2♠ N      K  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
        100    1.00   4.00  3♠ N -2   ♣5  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
        110    0.00   5.00  3♣ E      Q  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
20 ♠AQ8
KQT2
KQJ9
♣74
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J954
9
T42
♣AKT62
♠T62
A
A876
♣J9853
♠K73
J876543
53
♣Q
17
89
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4  ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1♠ 1NT  ♥3
LoTT: 18 - 21 = -3
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          5.00   0.00  4 N +1   ♠2  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  620          3.00   2.00  4 S      ♣A  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
  620          3.00   2.00  4 S      ♣A  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  620          3.00   2.00  4 N      ♣5  2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
  200          1.00   4.00  2 N +3   ♣4  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  170          0.00   5.00  2 N +2   ♣5  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
21 ♠KT
974
AK632
♣Q86
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠52
AK63
Q9874
♣A2
♠J763
J852
J5
♣KT9
♠AQ984
QT
T
♣J7543
12
136
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT5
EW: 1 1  ♣3 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          5.00   0.00  4 E -3   T  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Foy-Morrissey
  110          3.50   1.50  1♠ S +1   A  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  110          3.50   1.50  1♠ S +1   A  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
   90          2.00   3.00  1N N      2  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
        140    1.00   4.00  2 E +1   T  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        400    0.00   5.00  3N N -4   2  2-Miller-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Loops
22 ♠Q86
QT532
T75
♣J6
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KJ95
84
62
♣QT852
♠72
AJ976
A83
♣A93
♠AT43
K
KQJ94
♣K74
5
613
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠  ♣5 ♥6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♦5/4 ♠5/6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +90 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.50   0.50  2 S +1   8  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  110          4.50   0.50  2 S +1   8  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
  100          3.00   2.00  1N E -1   K  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
   90          1.50   3.50  2 S      8  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
   90          1.50   3.50  2 S      8  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
         50    0.00   5.00  2 S -1   8  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
23 ♠A85432
Q4
84
♣AT7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ97
T873
J7
♣KJ2
♠T6
952
KQ63
♣9865
♠J
AKJ6
AT952
♣Q43
10
105
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 2 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          5.00   0.00  3N N      ♣5  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
  140          4.00   1.00  3 S      ♠K  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
  130          3.00   2.00  2 S +2   ♠K  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
  110          2.00   3.00  2♠ N      9  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
        100    1.00   4.00  3N S -1   ♠7  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        200    0.00   5.00  3N N -2   3  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
24 ♠T
QT84
K65
♣J9876
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠876
K963
AJ3
♣KQ5
♠AQJ
A52
Q984
♣T32
♠K95432
J7
T72
♣A4
6
1313
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 1♣ 2 2 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          5.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♠4  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
        120    4.00   1.00  1N E +1   ♠2  3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Harken-Tainty
        150    3.00   2.00  1N E +2   ♠3  12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Loops-Loops
        210    2.00   3.00  1N E +4   ♠4  6-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Miller-Pringle
        400    1.00   4.00  3N E      ♠5  10-Graves-GUMZ vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
        460    0.00   5.00  3N E +2   ♠4  11-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
25 ♠J7
KJ84
T52
♣T875
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠942
73
K964
♣Q642
♠K65
965
AQ87
♣KJ9
♠AQT83
AQT2
J3
♣A3
5
513
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 5 4♠ 3NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.70   1.30  1♠ S +3   4  2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
  170          3.70   1.30  2 S +2   4  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
  170          3.70   1.30  2 S +2   4  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
  140          0.70   4.30  1♠ S +2   4  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  140          0.70   4.30  1♠ S +2   4  8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
26 ♠876
A862
AJ43
♣T8
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠K542
J4
Q762
♣J75
♠Q9
KT93
K9
♣AKQ96
♠AJT3
Q75
T85
♣432
9
717
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1/- 1 1♠ 2NT  ♦7/6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          4.90   0.10  3N W -2   2  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ
  100          3.70   1.30  3N W -1   8  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
        110    2.50   2.50  3♣ E      5  8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
        120    0.70   4.30  1N E +1   ♠3  2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
        120    0.70   4.30  1N E +1   ♠3  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
27 ♠932
AJ5
KQ2
♣AKT9
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AK5
KT862
J63
♣63
♠J74
Q73
74
♣QJ852
♠QT86
94
AT985
♣74
17
116
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 -/1 3♠ 2NT  ♥6/7
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          4.90   0.10  1N N +3   ♣Q  2-Miller-Pringle vs 11-Rodrigues-Corgiat
  150          3.10   1.90  2N N +1   ♣5  7-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
  150          3.10   1.90  1N N +2   ♣6  8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Elkins-Raphael
  130          1.30   3.70  2 S +2   ♠A  4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Stone-Nathanson
  110          0.10   4.90  3 S      ♠A  5-Nelson-Formoso vs 10-Graves-GUMZ