1 |
♠AT3
♥975
♦J943
♣K74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♥6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Pringle-Miller
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ S ♥4 12-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♥3 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
50 2.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 ♠6 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
110 1.00 4.00 1♥ E +1 ♣8 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♦2 9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
|
2 |
♠764
♥T943
♦KJ9
♣T53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -3 ♥3 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
300 4.00 1.00 4♠* W -2 ♦9 5-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
50 2.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥3 12-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
50 2.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♦9 9-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♥4 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Pringle-Miller
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ W ♥T 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
|
3 |
♠AQ865
♥AJ96
♦93
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 2N W -4 ♠6 9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Kremers-Downing
180 4.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♣4 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
120 3.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♦5 12-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ N ♦6 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ W -1 ♦3 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -2 ♦K 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Pringle-Miller
|
4 |
♠2
♥QJ3
♦J8753
♣9762
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 4/-NT ♥3/2 NT10/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.50 0.50 4♠* E -5 ♥A 9-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Kremers-Downing
500 4.50 0.50 3♠* E -2 ♥A 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 12-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
100 1.50 3.50 4♣ W -1 ♥Q 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ W -1 ♥Q 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
150 0.00 5.00 3♦ W +2 ♠2 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Pringle-Miller
|
5 |
♠AQ
♥543
♦T42
♣KT943
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ S ♠3 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Pringle-Miller
100 4.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♦4 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 3.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♠4 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥3 12-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
140 0.50 4.50 3♠ W ♦T 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Kremers-Downing
140 0.50 4.50 1♠ W +2 ♣4 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|
6 |
♠AKQJT9
♥5
♦J7
♣QJ52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1/-♥ 1/-NT ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥7/4 ♠5/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 9-Harken-Tainty
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 12-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
100 1.50 3.50 4♠* N -1 ♦A 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Pringle-Miller
100 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♠7 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Kremers-Downing
800 0.00 5.00 4♥* S -4 ♦2 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|
7 |
♠K3
♥752
♦K87
♣A8762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ ♦4 ♥7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦K 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
120 4.00 1.00 2N W ♣6 12-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Pringle-Miller
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥3 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Kremers-Downing
180 2.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♣6 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
200 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +3 ♦7 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
600 0.00 5.00 3N W ♣8 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
|
8 |
♠KQ754
♥763
♦5
♣KQ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣J 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
170 4.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♣8 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
140 2.00 3.00 1♠ N +2 ♦A 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 9-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ S ♣8 12-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Pringle-Miller
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♣8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Kremers-Downing
110 0.00 5.00 2♦ S +1 ♣5 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
|
9 |
♠Q542
♥AKQ72
♦-
♣AK84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦2 12-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Kremers-Downing
450 4.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣5 4-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
420 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣5 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
420 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣5 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
50 1.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♠3 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 5.00 4♥* N -1 ♦3 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|
10 |
♠9864
♥K92
♦A64
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3/4 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠8 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣6 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
150 3.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♠4 9-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
630 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠9 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
630 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠4 12-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Kremers-Downing
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠2 4-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
|
11 |
♠K3
♥KT9865
♦A2
♣876
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣J 4-Pringle-Miller vs 9-Harken-Tainty
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣9 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
170 3.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♣J 12-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣J 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣J 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣J 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
|
12 |
♠AT3
♥T542
♦972
♣K95
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥8 5-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
620 4.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥8 12-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♥8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
200 2.50 2.50 2♠ S +3 ♥8 1-Graves-GUMZ vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.00 4.00 4♣* E -1 ♠K 4-Pringle-Miller vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♥3 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
|
13 |
♠Q7643
♥KQ65
♦72
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 6N W -3 ♥5 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 4-Pringle-Miller
200 4.00 1.00 6N E -2 ♣K 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 3.00 2.00 4♣ W -1 ♦7 12-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
130 2.00 3.00 2♣ W +2 ♦7 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
600 0.50 4.50 3N W ♠8 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.50 4.50 3N W ♣T 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
|
14 |
♠AKT4
♥Q7
♦KQ763
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 5.00 0.00 6♥ S +1 ♠7 12-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
510 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 ♠3 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Harken-Tainty
510 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 ♦J 5-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
510 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 ♦J 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
510 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 ♦9 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
510 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +3 ♣J 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 4-Pringle-Miller
|
15 |
♠2
♥J72
♦Q98
♣KT9542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6/5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 2N N ♠J 12-Allen-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥6 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Kremers-Downing
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S ♣Q 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♥4 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 9-Harken-Tainty
200 0.50 4.50 1♠ S -2 ♣Q 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pringle-Miller
200 0.50 4.50 2♥ S -2 ♣Q 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
|
16 |
♠9832
♥QJ9
♦K9643
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N S ♣7 12-Allen-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
120 3.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♣5 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 2-Morrissey-Foy
120 3.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♣5 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat vs 4-Pringle-Miller
80 2.00 3.00 1♥ S ♠T 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Kremers-Downing
50 1.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♣5 3-Elkins-Raphael vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 ♣T 11-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
|
17 |
♠A94
♥J853
♦Q96
♣652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♦2 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
120 4.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♣3 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
50 3.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦7 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
50 1.50 3.50 1N S -1 ♥6 5-Kremers-Downing vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♣8 4-Pringle-Miller vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
120 0.00 5.00 1N E +1 ♠K 12-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Harken-Tainty
|
18 |
♠AKQ854
♥AQT4
♦872
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣7/6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣7 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣6 5-Kremers-Downing vs 10-Rodrigues-Corgiat
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♣T 4-Pringle-Miller vs 1-Graves-GUMZ
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣T 12-Allen-Formoso vs 9-Harken-Tainty
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♣T 2-Morrissey-Foy vs 11-Cowen-Hahn
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♣T 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 3-Elkins-Raphael
|