1 |
♠8754
♥AKT
♦9
♣T6542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣A 4-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Downing-Davidson
100 5.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♠T 1-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 3.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♦5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
50 3.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♦5 5-Modest-Loops vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 ♣A 8-Harken-Harken vs 7-Loops-Cowen
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ E ♣A 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
400 0.00 6.00 3N E ♦3 7-Winham-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
2 |
♠3
♥KJ82
♦QJ983
♣A94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦Q 4-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Downing-Davidson
170 4.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♦4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
170 4.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♦4 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
400 2.00 4.00 3N W ♥2 1-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
400 2.00 4.00 3N W ♦Q 7-Winham-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
400 2.00 4.00 3N E ♥5 5-Modest-Loops vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.00 6.00 4♠ E ♥5 8-Harken-Harken vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
3 |
♠QJ9432
♥J3
♦A63
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4N E -2 ♠K 7-Winham-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 5.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣A 1-Miller-Osborn vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 3.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♦8 8-Harken-Harken vs 7-Loops-Cowen
50 3.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
150 1.50 4.50 2N E +1 ♠K 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
150 1.50 4.50 2N E +1 ♦J 5-Modest-Loops vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.00 6.00 4♠* N -2 ♣A 4-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Downing-Davidson
|
4 |
♠97
♥KQJ98
♦KT
♣K863
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♥ N ♠4 5-Modest-Loops vs 7-Loops-Cowen
110 4.75 1.25 2♥ S ♥7 1-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.42 3.58 3♥ N -1 ♠2 4-Zinman-Chase vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.42 3.58 3♥ N -1 ♠2 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Downing-Davidson
100 2.42 3.58 3♥ N -1 ♣2 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 0.08 5.92 2♠ W ♥K 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
|
5 |
♠542
♥87
♦K642
♣Q974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 3♥ E +1 ♣J 5-Modest-Loops vs 7-Loops-Cowen
260 4.75 1.25 3♥ E +4 ♣6 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Downing-Davidson
420 3.58 2.42 4♥ E ♥7 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
450 2.42 3.58 4♥ E +1 ♦5 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
510 0.67 5.33 4♥ E +3 ♥9 1-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
510 0.67 5.33 4♥ E +3 ♣J 4-Zinman-Chase vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
6 |
♠T8
♥Q542
♦8753
♣AK7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.92 0.08 1N N +1 ♣5 4-Zinman-Chase vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
PASS 4.17 1.83 Pass Out 1-Miller-Osborn vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
PASS 4.17 1.83 Pass Out 8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Downing-Davidson
50 1.83 4.17 1N N -1 ♣T 7-Winham-Stone vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
50 1.83 4.17 1N N -1 ♣8 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.08 5.92 3♥ N -2 ♣8 5-Modest-Loops vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
7 |
♠KT97
♥K5
♦AQT54
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 1N S -1 ♥T 2-Wainer-Allen vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 4.75 1.25 2♥ E ♦2 5-Modest-Loops vs 6-Downing-Davidson
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ E +1 ♦J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ E +1 ♦6 1-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Loops-Cowen
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ E +1 ♦2 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ E +1 ♦2 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
8 |
♠AJ432
♥QT6
♦942
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3♥ S -2 ♠5 5-Modest-Loops vs 6-Downing-Davidson
110 4.75 1.25 3♦ E ♥A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
130 1.83 4.17 3♣ W +1 ♥6 2-Wainer-Allen vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
130 1.83 4.17 3♣ W +1 ♦9 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.83 4.17 3♣ W +1 ♦4 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 1.83 4.17 2♣ W +2 ♦9 1-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
9 |
♠K6
♥A92
♦AKT64
♣Q82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.92 0.08 4♠ S +2 ♦9 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♦5 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣J 2-Wainer-Allen vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 1-Miller-Osborn vs 7-Loops-Cowen
450 3.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.08 5.92 3N N -4 ♦3 5-Modest-Loops vs 6-Downing-Davidson
|
10 |
♠A874
♥943
♦AK974
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 4♥ E -2 ♦T 1-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Downing-Davidson
100 4.75 1.25 4♥ E -1 ♠5 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Cowen
110 3.58 2.42 3♣ E ♥T 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
140 2.42 3.58 3♥ E ♦T 7-Winham-Stone vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
180 1.25 4.75 1N E +3 ♠5 2-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.08 5.92 2♥ S -4 ♦3 4-Zinman-Chase vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
|
11 |
♠Q9653
♥Q
♦AK42
♣K97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.92 0.08 4♠ N ♣A 2-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
170 4.17 1.83 3♠ N +1 ♣A 1-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Downing-Davidson
170 4.17 1.83 3♠ N +1 ♣A 4-Zinman-Chase vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
140 2.42 3.58 2♠ N +1 ♦T 7-Winham-Stone vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.67 5.33 4♠ N -2 ♥2 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
100 0.67 5.33 4♠ N -2 ♣A 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
12 |
♠KJ83
♥AQJ93
♦T
♣T82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.92 0.08 4♥ N +1 ♦A 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Cowen
620 4.17 1.83 4♥ N ♦A 7-Winham-Stone vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
620 4.17 1.83 4♥ N ♦A 8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
170 2.42 3.58 3♠ S +1 ♦2 2-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.25 4.75 4♣ S +1 ♦5 4-Zinman-Chase vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
100 0.08 5.92 4♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Miller-Osborn vs 6-Downing-Davidson
|
13 |
♠J932
♥QJ753
♦95
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.33 0.67 1N S +2 ♦A 4-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
150 5.33 0.67 1N S +2 ♦2 5-Modest-Loops vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.58 2.42 1♥ N +2 ♣5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
120 1.83 4.17 1N S +1 ♠7 1-Miller-Osborn vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
120 1.83 4.17 1N S +1 ♦A 2-Wainer-Allen vs 7-Loops-Cowen
90 0.08 5.92 1N S ♠7 7-Winham-Stone vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠JT8
♥6
♦A9532
♣AKQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 2/-♠ 2NT ♥6 ♠8/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.92 0.08 2N N ♦J 1-Miller-Osborn vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
110 4.17 1.83 2♦ N +1 ♥Q 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 4.17 1.83 2♦ N +1 ♥Q 4-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
90 1.83 4.17 1N S ♥Q 7-Winham-Stone vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.83 4.17 1N S ♦2 5-Modest-Loops vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.08 5.92 3N S -2 ♥2 2-Wainer-Allen vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
15 |
♠J97542
♥JT
♦98
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.92 0.08 4♣ E ♠8 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
430 2.42 3.58 3N W +1 ♠5 5-Modest-Loops vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
430 2.42 3.58 3N W +1 ♦9 1-Miller-Osborn vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
430 2.42 3.58 3N W +1 ♦9 2-Wainer-Allen vs 7-Loops-Cowen
430 2.42 3.58 3N W +1 ♦9 4-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
430 2.42 3.58 3N E +1 ♦T 7-Winham-Stone vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠A86
♥J7
♦AK92
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 5.92 0.08 1N N ♣T 5-Modest-Loops vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
50 4.17 1.83 1N N -1 ♣T 1-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
50 4.17 1.83 1N N -1 ♣T 2-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ E +1 ♠3 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Downing-Davidson
140 1.83 4.17 1♥ E +2 ♦3 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
170 0.08 5.92 3♥ E +1 ♦3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠J98732
♥AT2
♦8
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♦ 2♠ ♥3/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.92 0.08 4♠* W -2 ♦8 2-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 4.75 1.25 3♥ S +1 ♥8 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 3.58 2.42 4♠ W -2 ♦8 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Downing-Davidson
100 2.42 3.58 5♥ S -2 ♦2 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.67 5.33 5♦ E ♥K 1-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
400 0.67 5.33 5♦ E ♥K 5-Modest-Loops vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
|
18 |
♠J
♥Q3
♦AJ97652
♣T52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 4♠ E -2 ♦3 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 4.75 1.25 4♠ E -1 ♣J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.58 2.42 2♠ E ♣J 1-Miller-Osborn vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
420 1.25 4.75 4♠ E ♦3 2-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
420 1.25 4.75 4♠ E ♦3 5-Modest-Loops vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
420 1.25 4.75 4♠ E ♦3 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Downing-Davidson
|
19 |
♠A63
♥JT
♦AJ97
♣KQ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 2♠ N +1 ♦7 7-Winham-Stone vs 7-Loops-Cowen
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♥3 4-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♥3 5-Modest-Loops vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
50 2.42 3.58 2♠ N -1 ♥3 2-Wainer-Allen vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
100 0.67 5.33 3♠ S -2 ♥6 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.67 5.33 2♠ S -2 ♣J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Downing-Davidson
|
20 |
♠J76
♥65
♦KQ72
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2/1♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 3♦ N +2 ♥7 4-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ S ♠4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Downing-Davidson
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ S ♠4 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ S ♣A 2-Wainer-Allen vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ N ♠7 7-Winham-Stone vs 7-Loops-Cowen
90 0.08 5.92 2♣ W ♥6 5-Modest-Loops vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
|
21 |
♠JT84
♥Q54
♦94
♣AKQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.33 0.67 3N S ♥2 5-Modest-Loops vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
600 5.33 0.67 3N N ♠6 4-Zinman-Chase vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
120 3.58 2.42 2N S ♥2 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.83 4.17 3N S -1 ♥2 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Downing-Davidson
100 1.83 4.17 3N S -1 ♣T 2-Wainer-Allen vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
200 0.08 5.92 3N S -2 ♥2 7-Winham-Stone vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|
22 |
♠AKQ9762
♥QT
♦98
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ ♣5/4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.75 1.25 4♠ N +1 ♣7 4-Zinman-Chase vs 7-Loops-Cowen
450 4.75 1.25 4♠ N +1 ♣7 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
450 4.75 1.25 4♠ N +1 ♣7 7-Winham-Stone vs 6-Downing-Davidson
420 1.83 4.17 4♠ N ♣8 2-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
420 1.83 4.17 4♠ N ♣2 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.08 5.92 5♠ N -1 ♣6 8-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠-
♥AKJT
♦AKJ95
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 5/6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 5.92 0.08 3N N +4 ♥4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
660 4.17 1.83 3N S +2 ♠2 2-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
660 4.17 1.83 3N S +2 ♠2 4-Zinman-Chase vs 7-Loops-Cowen
630 1.83 4.17 3N S +1 ♠2 7-Winham-Stone vs 6-Downing-Davidson
630 1.83 4.17 3N S +1 ♣6 8-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.08 5.92 3N N ♣5 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
|
24 |
♠J9
♥KQ3
♦QT2
♣T8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 1♠ E +3 ♣J 2-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Graves-Rodrigues
420 4.17 1.83 4♠ E ♥9 7-Winham-Stone vs 6-Downing-Davidson
420 4.17 1.83 4♠ E ♥4 6-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-McDuff-Avenmarg
450 1.25 4.75 4♠ E +1 ♥9 8-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.25 4.75 4♠ E +1 ♣J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
450 1.25 4.75 4♠ E +1 ♣J 4-Zinman-Chase vs 7-Loops-Cowen
|