1 |
♠QT984
♥A73
♦Q42
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 5♣ E -2 ♦7 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Modest
50 4.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣Q 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
50 3.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 5-Winham-Harken vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
130 1.50 3.50 3♦ W +1 ♥A 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
130 1.50 3.50 4♣ E ♦7 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
150 0.00 5.00 4♦ W +1 ♥5 3-Loops-Cowen vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
2 |
♠KJ983
♥KJ
♦98732
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ -/1NT ♥5 ♠4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ N ♦6 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 3.50 1.50 3♦ W -2 ♣2 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 1.50 2♣ W -2 ♦9 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
50 2.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♠8 3-Loops-Cowen vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
150 1.00 4.00 1N W +2 ♠8 5-Winham-Harken vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
400 0.00 5.00 3N E ♥7 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
3 |
♠A8
♥T74
♦QJ874
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 1♠ E +4 ♥6 1-Loops-Modest vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
200 4.50 0.50 2♥ E +3 ♦6 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠2 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦6 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Winham-Harken
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♣J 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♦8 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Cowen
|
4 |
♠54
♥T862
♦JT862
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♣A 1-Loops-Modest vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
120 4.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♣Q 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
90 3.00 2.00 1N W ♥6 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Loops-Cowen
150 2.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♦6 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Winham-Harken
200 1.00 4.00 2♣ S -2 ♠K 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
870 0.00 5.00 2♠* E +1 ♣A 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
|
5 |
♠A983
♥AKJ53
♦KT2
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 1.50 5♥ N ♦6 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦6 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦3 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♣A 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
630 1.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♦7 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 5-Winham-Harken
620 0.00 5.00 4♥ N ♦6 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Cowen
|
6 |
♠J2
♥Q4
♦A653
♣A8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ W +1 ♥Q 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
200 3.50 1.50 2♠ W +3 ♣3 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Cowen
200 3.50 1.50 1♠ W +4 ♥4 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ W ♥Q 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♠J 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 5-Winham-Harken
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♠2 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠Q7
♥KJ5
♦AQ642
♣Q73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1/2♥ ♣6 ♦3/4 ♠5/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♥4 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
130 4.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 ♠T 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♠Q 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Winham-Harken
90 2.00 3.00 1N N ♥6 3-Loops-Cowen vs 1-Loops-Modest
200 1.00 4.00 4♦ S -2 ♥4 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
300 0.00 5.00 3♣ N -3 ♥4 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
|
8 |
♠K7
♥AJT842
♦4
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠6 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
400 3.50 1.50 3N S ♠J 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
400 3.50 1.50 3N S ♠5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
150 2.00 3.00 3♠ W -3 ♦4 3-Loops-Cowen vs 1-Loops-Modest
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 ♥2 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 ♠9 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 5-Winham-Harken
|
9 |
♠J7
♥T7532
♦QJ6
♣T84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♠J 3-Loops-Cowen vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
660 4.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♦3 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
690 3.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♥6 1-Loops-Modest vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
1440 1.00 4.00 6N W ♥5 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
1440 1.00 4.00 6N E ♠K 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
1440 1.00 4.00 6N E ♠2 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 5-Winham-Harken
|
10 |
♠A984
♥K2
♦5
♣KT8763
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♠5 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥J 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♠5 1-Loops-Modest vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
200 2.50 2.50 2♠ S +3 ♥J 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 ♠K 3-Loops-Cowen vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♥J 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 5-Winham-Harken
|
11 |
♠Q4
♥K975
♦Q7632
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/4♦ 2♥ 4/5♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣6 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
400 4.00 1.00 3N N ♣2 5-Winham-Harken vs 3-Loops-Cowen
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ S ♦T 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
130 1.50 3.50 4♦ N ♣2 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S +1 ♥6 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♥J 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
12 |
♠J3
♥AQ93
♦54
♣T8642
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♦4 5-Winham-Harken vs 3-Loops-Cowen
180 4.00 1.00 2N W +2 ♥3 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
200 3.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 ♦Q 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦4 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♦2 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
13 |
♠AT
♥9752
♦875
♣KQ53
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
200 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♣9 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Loops-Cowen
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♠4 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♣2 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ E ♠4 5-Winham-Harken vs 1-Loops-Modest
620 0.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦4 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
|
14 |
♠K87
♥T87432
♦4
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠5 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥5 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♦5 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 3-Loops-Cowen
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ S ♦5 5-Winham-Harken vs 1-Loops-Modest
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♦5 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 7-Stolzberg-Riley
90 0.00 5.00 1N E ♠9 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
|
15 |
♠A765
♥QJ97
♦AJ4
♣QT
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ N ♠K 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 1-Loops-Modest
130 4.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♥5 3-Loops-Cowen vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ N ♠K 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ N ♣4 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
200 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠K 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Winham-Harken
300 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♠8 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
|
16 |
♠Q86
♥QT85
♦9762
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♣T 10-Avenmarg-McDuff vs 4-Rodrigues-Graves
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠9 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Ficarrotta-Walker
90 3.00 2.00 1N S ♠9 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ S -2 ♠9 3-Loops-Cowen vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ S -2 ♦4 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 8-Pringle-Vadas
150 0.00 5.00 2N W +1 ♣K 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Winham-Harken
|
17 |
♠JT32
♥92
♦AK32
♣854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥A 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Loops-Modest
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ N ♣9 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣T 5-Winham-Harken vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
50 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣T 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Loops-Cowen
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦T 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
450 0.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♠J 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
18 |
♠AJ852
♥94
♦K954
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣3 7-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Loops-Cowen
150 4.00 1.00 5♥ E -3 ♠T 2-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦A 8-Pringle-Vadas vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 ♥7 12-Reiss-Kobland vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♣4 5-Winham-Harken vs 10-Avenmarg-McDuff
|