? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Charles Pender - John Hullman 61.46 1st A 0.70
Ken Gamble - Ken Llacera 56.25 2nd A 0.49
Janet Tainty - Rachael Spencer 54.17 3rd A 0.35
Farol Henderson - Leslie Davidson 53.13 1st C 0.24
EVENT>Friday Morning Pairs     |SESSION>Friday Morn  |SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>June 21, 2024      |CLUB NO.>137059    | 06/21/2024 13:58
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Ken Gamble      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   24.0 |TOP>   2 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/1000 |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=7/B=6/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Rachael Spencer        Janet Tainty             B    3     2     .     26.00  54.17  0.35(A) 
 3 Diana Schilling        Joanne Bruno             B    .     .     .     23.50  48.96          
 4 John Hullman           Charles Pender           B    1     1     .     29.50  61.46  0.70(A) 
 5 Kenneth Martin         John Walker              C    .     .     .     13.00  27.08          
 6 Leslie Davidson        Farol Henderson          C    .     .     1     25.50  53.13  0.24(C) 
 7 Ken Gamble             Ken Llacera              A    2     .     .     27.00  56.25  0.49(A) 
 8 Robert Johnson         John Wesolowski          C    .     .     .     23.50  48.96          
                                          Totals                         168.00       

1 ♠J95
KJT9
Q97
♣J43
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QT73
-
T632
♣QT875
♠K62
A87643
A54
♣A
♠A84
Q52
KJ8
♣K962
8
415
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1NT  ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4
EW: 1♣ 2 1 2♠  NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -100 2NT*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  2 E -2   ♣2  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
   50          1.00   1.00  2 E -1   ♣2  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
         80    0.00   2.00  1 E      ♣2  5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
2 ♠A74
K752
AQJ83
♣3
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J9
AQ64
K5
♣KQJ94
♠QT863
JT93
T92
♣8
♠K52
8
764
♣AT7652
14
163
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 4 2♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW: -/1  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +500 4*-E-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  250          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -5   8  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
  100          0.50   1.50  2♠ W -2   ♣3  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
  100          0.50   1.50  2 W -2   ♣3  5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
3 ♠QJ4
Q843
A3
♣T863
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK532
-
QT9
♣AKQJ9
♠T76
K9652
65
♣542
♠98
AJT7
KJ8742
♣7
9
193
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1  ♣4 ♠3 NT6
EW: 3/2♣ 4♠ 1/-NT
       ♦5/4 ♥5 NT7/6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    2.00   0.00  3 S -3   ♣A  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
        170    1.00   1.00  3♠ W +1   A  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
        500    0.00   2.00  5* S -3  ♣A  5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
4 ♠KT4
AKJ2
AK543
♣6
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ8532
7
762
♣QT3
♠7
QT94
QJT8
♣A842
♠J96
8653
9
♣KJ975
18
89
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 3 1♠ 1NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  2♠ W -2   A  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
  110          1.00   1.00  3 N      ♠7  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
        300    0.00   2.00  3♣ N -3   ♠7  5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
5 ♠T4
AK3
A8532
♣KT2
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ7653
J98
K
♣J74
♠Q982
QT7
97
♣Q863
♠A
6542
QJT64
♣A95
14
96
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 6 5 1♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: +1370 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          2.00   0.00  4♠* E -3  A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
  170          1.00   1.00  4 N +2   ♠2  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
  150          0.00   2.00  4 N +1   ♠2  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
6 ♠-
97542
KQ62
♣AKT2
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠Q6432
-
J854
♣Q943
♠J5
AKQ63
A93
♣J85
♠AKT987
JT8
T7
♣76
12
515
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/- 1♠
       ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥7/6 NT6
EW: 1♣ -/1NT
       ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6/7
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -90 1NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.00   0.00  3 E -3   ♠A  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
  110          1.00   1.00  2♠ S      4  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
         50    0.00   2.00  2♠ N -1   4  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
7 ♠K986
Q2
T9842
♣97
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠QT74
7
KJ7
♣AKQ84
♠J
T5
AQ653
♣JT632
♠A532
AKJ98643
-
♣5
5
158
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 2♠  ♣1 ♦4 NT4
EW: 4♣ 3  ♥2 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 21 - 20 = +1
Par: +500 6♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.00   0.00  4 S +1   ♣A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
  100          1.00   1.00  6♣ E -1   ♠A  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
        200    0.00   2.00  5* S -1  ♣A  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
8 ♠A975
QJ84
T4
♣QJ9
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠KJ86
53
KJ8
♣T854
♠-
AT972
Q532
♣A732
♠QT432
K6
A976
♣K6
10
810
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠ 2/1NT  ♣5 ♦6 ♥6
EW: 2♣ 1 1  ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.00   0.00  2♠ S -1   5  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
        100    1.00   1.00  3♠ S -2   ♣4  4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
        110    0.00   2.00  2 E      ♠3  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
9 ♠Q72
QJ86
962
♣A62
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A5
A4
K743
♣Q9753
♠T843
KT97
T5
♣T84
♠KJ96
532
AQJ8
♣KJ
9
133
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1 1♠ 1/-NT
       ♣6 NT7/6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          2.00   0.00  2N S +2   3  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
  150          0.50   1.50  2N S +1   3  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
  150          0.50   1.50  2N S +1   ♣5  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
10 ♠QJ74
Q432
6
♣AT54
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠2
AJT76
A5
♣J9632
♠T9865
985
KJ2
♣Q8
♠AK3
K
QT98743
♣K7
9
106
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          2.00   0.00  3* W -2  6  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
  130          0.50   1.50  4 S      ♠2  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
  130          0.50   1.50  3 S +1   A  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
11 ♠KT98
52
JT86
♣T73
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠-
98764
K52
♣AK854
♠A7653
K
AQ43
♣J62
♠QJ42
AQJT3
97
♣Q9
4
1014
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 5/4♣ 3 2 1♠ 3NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -400 3NT-EW/5♣-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.00   0.00  2 S -2   ♣A  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
        110    1.00   1.00  3♣ W      5  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
        130    0.00   2.00  2♣ W +2   5  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
12 ♠T95
T65
J743
♣765
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠Q643
KJ432
Q52
♣Q
♠K82
AQ98
A9
♣AJ92
♠AJ7
7
KT86
♣KT843
1
1018
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 1 5 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -450 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    2.00   0.00  4 W      3  4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
        450    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   ♠T  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
        450    0.50   1.50  4 W +1   ♠T  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
13 ♠AQT
9
J632
♣AK754
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠J876
QJ6542
AT
♣T
♠32
A83
KQ754
♣986
♠K954
KT7
98
♣QJ32
14
89
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥4
EW: 3  ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  3♠ S      A  5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
        100    1.00   1.00  4♠ S -1   4  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
        140    0.00   2.00  3 W      ♣A  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
14 ♠AQ8
98
AKQJT9
♣T9
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠6
KT7432
64
♣AQ32
♠T75
QJ6
7
♣KJ8654
♠KJ9432
A5
8532
♣7
16
97
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6 6♠ 1NT  ♣3 ♥3
EW: 4♣ 3  ♦0 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 22 - 20 = +2
Par: +500 7♣*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  510          1.00   1.00  5♠ S +2   4  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
  510          1.00   1.00  4♠ S +3   4  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
  510          1.00   1.00  4♠ S +3   6  5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
15 ♠T4
AKQ865
965
♣KJ
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠J985
97
AQ43
♣765
♠Q63
43
KT872
♣983
♠AK72
JT2
J
♣AQT42
13
75
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 1 6 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠4 NT0
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +1430 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1460          1.50   0.50  6 N +1   4  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
 1460          1.50   0.50  6 N +1   ♣8  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
  680          0.00   2.00  4 N +2   7  5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
16 ♠KJ85
JT
Q87
♣A853
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠T9
KQ7652
AKT53
♣-
♠AQ4
A43
62
♣KQT96
♠7632
98
J94
♣J742
11
1215
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠3 NT2
EW: 4♣ 6 7 3♠ 5NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -2210 7-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  6 W -1   J  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
        710    1.00   1.00  4 W +3   J  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
       1460    0.00   2.00  6 W +1   ♣A  5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
17 ♠T53
QJT84
73
♣T43
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AK8642
A2
6
♣J986
♠Q7
K96
AJT2
♣K752
♠J9
753
KQ9854
♣AQ
3
1213
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
EW: 5♣ 1/- 1 5♠ 4NT  ♦7/6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  4♣ E -1   3  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
        450    0.50   1.50  4♠ W +1   Q  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
        450    0.50   1.50  4♠ W +1   7  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
18 ♠Q3
A9
AT765
♣Q975
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A9865
KQT4
KQ4
♣K
♠K4
J8762
J92
♣642
♠JT72
53
83
♣AJT83
12
175
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 1NT  ♥3 ♠6
EW: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♦5 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.00   0.00  4 W -1   ♣5  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        170    0.50   1.50  3 W +1   ♠Q  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
        170    0.50   1.50  2 W +2   ♣5  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
19 ♠K972
Q97
A64
♣KQ5
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠654
KJ6
98
♣JT982
♠QJT83
85
KT75
♣A3
♠A
AT432
QJ32
♣764
14
510
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 3/4 -/1♠ 2NT
       ♠6/7
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  4 S      ♣J  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
  400          1.00   1.00  3N N      ♠Q  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        100    0.00   2.00  4 S -2   ♣J  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
20 ♠A972
A763
Q2
♣AK3
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠KQJT63
84
J75
♣Q7
♠54
J52
AK643
♣J95
♠8
KQT9
T98
♣T8642
17
99
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    1.50   0.50  2N N -1   ♠5  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
        100    1.50   0.50  2N N -1   ♠4  7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        140    0.00   2.00  3♠ W      ♣A  6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
21 ♠T8542
92
A9843
♣6
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A9
QJT763
72
♣853
♠K763
4
J65
♣AKT42
♠QJ
AK85
KQT
♣QJ97
4
711
18
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2♠ 3NT  ♣6 ♥5
EW: 1/-♣ 2  ♣7/6 ♦3 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +300 4*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          2.00   0.00  3N S      Q  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
  150          1.00   1.00  2N S +1   Q  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
        100    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   Q  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
22 ♠Q84
Q9643
AQJ
♣95
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T72
52
2
♣KQT8643
♠K9
KT7
987653
♣A2
♠AJ653
AJ8
KT4
♣J7
11
510
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4 5♠  ♣6 NT6
EW: 1♣  ♦5/4 ♥3/0 ♠0 NT0
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.00   0.00  4♠ S      ♣K  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
  140          1.00   1.00  3♠ S      2  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -2   2  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
23 ♠K864
753
7642
♣KJ
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J5
82
AKQJ
♣QT876
♠973
QJ964
T5
♣A53
♠AQT2
AKT
983
♣942
7
137
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♦6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2♠ N      T  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
  100          1.00   1.00  2 W -1   ♣K  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
         90    0.00   2.00  1N W      ♠4  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
24 ♠J75
8
KQT9
♣KT953
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AKQ9862
A9
AJ3
♣7
♠-
KQ7632
54
♣AQJ82
♠T43
JT54
8762
♣64
9
1812
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2/3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠0 NT0
EW: 4♣ 3 6 7♠ 7NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -1520 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        480    2.00   0.00  4♠ W +2   K  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
        980    1.00   1.00  6♠ W      K  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
       1010    0.00   2.00  6♠ W +1   K  3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
25 ♠AJ9
AK932
J864
♣2
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KQ
54
AQ732
♣QJ97
♠T87532
QJ7
95
♣K3
♠64
T86
KT
♣AT8654
13
146
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/1♣ 3 1NT  ♦6 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  2 N +1   ♠5  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
         50    1.00   1.00  3 N -1   9  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
        110    0.00   2.00  2♠ E      6  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
26 ♠J873
Q6
Q82
♣8765
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠94
K75
AK95
♣AKJ4
♠Q652
AJT92
J3
♣93
♠AKT
843
T764
♣QT2
5
188
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 3 5 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    2.00   0.00  4 E      ♠K  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
        650    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   ♠A  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
        650    0.50   1.50  4 E +1   ♠A  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
27 ♠J842
K32
532
♣AJ5
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠QT93
J98
T96
♣K94
♠K
AQ765
Q
♣Q87632
♠A765
T4
AKJ874
♣T
9
613
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 2NT  ♣4 ♥4/5
EW: 3♣ 2  ♦4 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +100 4♣*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          2.00   0.00  5♣* W -3  5  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
  140          1.00   1.00  2♠ N +1   ♣T  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
         50    0.00   2.00  4♠ N -1   Q  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
28 ♠T98
QJ43
T7
♣AQT3
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJ7
972
AJ3
♣K852
♠A653
A85
8642
♣76
♠K42
KT6
KQ95
♣J94
9
118
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 3 1♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.00   0.00  1 N +2   ♣7  4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
  110          1.00   1.00  2 S +1   ♠Q  1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
  100          0.00   2.00  1N* W -1  3  8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera