1 |
♠J95
♥KJT9
♦Q97
♣J43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♣2 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♣2 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
80 0.00 2.00 1♥ E ♣2 5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
2 |
♠A74
♥K752
♦AQJ83
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -5 ♥8 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ W -2 ♣3 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ W -2 ♣3 5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
3 |
♠QJ4
♥Q843
♦A3
♣T863
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 4♠ 1/-NT ♦5/4 ♥5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♥ S -3 ♣A 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♦A 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
500 0.00 2.00 5♦* S -3 ♣A 5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
4 |
♠KT4
♥AKJ2
♦AK543
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥A 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ N ♠7 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
300 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -3 ♠7 5-Martin-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
5 |
♠T4
♥AK3
♦A8532
♣KT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -3 ♥A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
170 1.00 1.00 4♦ N +2 ♠2 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
150 0.00 2.00 4♦ N +1 ♠2 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
6 |
♠-
♥97542
♦KQ62
♣AKT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥7/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠A 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S ♦4 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦4 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
7 |
♠K986
♥Q2
♦T9842
♣97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
100 1.00 1.00 6♣ E -1 ♠A 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
200 0.00 2.00 5♥* S -1 ♣A 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
8 |
♠A975
♥QJ84
♦T4
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♥5 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 5-Martin-Walker
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 ♣4 4-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♠3 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
9 |
♠Q72
♥QJ86
♦962
♣A62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♦3 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
150 0.50 1.50 2N S +1 ♦3 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
150 0.50 1.50 2N S +1 ♣5 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
10 |
♠QJ74
♥Q432
♦6
♣AT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 3♥* W -2 ♦6 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
130 0.50 1.50 4♦ S ♠2 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ S +1 ♥A 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
|
11 |
♠KT98
♥52
♦JT86
♣T73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5/4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ S -2 ♣A 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W ♥5 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
130 0.00 2.00 2♣ W +2 ♥5 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
12 |
♠T95
♥T65
♦J743
♣765
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ W ♦3 4-Hullman-Pender vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♠T 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♠T 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
|
13 |
♠AQT
♥9
♦J632
♣AK754
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S ♦A 5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♥4 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣A 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
14 |
♠AQ8
♥98
♦AKQJT9
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 1.00 1.00 5♠ S +2 ♥4 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
510 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +3 ♥4 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
510 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +3 ♦6 5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
15 |
♠T4
♥AKQ865
♦965
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 1.50 0.50 6♥ N +1 ♥4 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
1460 1.50 0.50 6♥ N +1 ♣8 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
680 0.00 2.00 4♥ N +2 ♦7 5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
16 |
♠KJ85
♥JT
♦Q87
♣A853
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 7♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♥J 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
710 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +3 ♥J 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 4-Hullman-Pender
1460 0.00 2.00 6♥ W +1 ♣A 5-Martin-Walker vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
17 |
♠T53
♥QJT84
♦73
♣T43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -1 ♥3 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♦7 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
18 |
♠Q3
♥A9
♦AT765
♣Q975
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣5 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♠Q 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ W +2 ♣5 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
19 |
♠K972
♥Q97
♦A64
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣J 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♠Q 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♣J 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
20 |
♠A972
♥A763
♦Q2
♣AK3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♠5 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 5-Martin-Walker
100 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♠4 7-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Hullman-Pender
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W ♣A 6-Davidson-Henderson vs 1-Spencer-Tainty
|
21 |
♠T8542
♥92
♦A9843
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♥ ♣7/6 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N S ♥Q 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
150 1.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♥Q 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥Q 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
22 |
♠Q84
♥Q9643
♦AQJ
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5/4 ♥3/0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣K 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦2 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♦2 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
23 |
♠K864
♥753
♦7642
♣KJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N ♦T 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♣K 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
90 0.00 2.00 1N W ♠4 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
|
24 |
♠J75
♥8
♦KQT9
♣KT953
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ W +2 ♦K 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 5-Martin-Walker
980 1.00 1.00 6♠ W ♦K 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 6-Davidson-Henderson
1010 0.00 2.00 6♠ W +1 ♦K 3-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Hullman-Pender
|
25 |
♠AJ9
♥AK932
♦J864
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♠5 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♦9 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥6 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
26 |
♠J873
♥Q6
♦Q82
♣8765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ E ♠K 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|
27 |
♠J842
♥K32
♦532
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 5♣* W -3 ♦5 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣T 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦Q 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
|
28 |
♠T98
♥QJ43
♦T7
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 1♥ N +2 ♣7 4-Hullman-Pender vs 5-Martin-Walker
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♠Q 1-Spencer-Tainty vs 3-Schilling-Bruno
100 0.00 2.00 1N* W -1 ♥3 8-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 7-Gamble-Llacera
|