1 |
♠842
♥7652
♦J7
♣Q763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 1.00 0.00 3♠ E +3 ♠6 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Pringle-Miller
450 0.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♦K 3-Davidson-Harken vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
2 |
♠652
♥AQT97
♦AT975
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6/7 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 2♦ N -1 ♣A 3-Davidson-Harken vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
140 0.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♦Q 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
3 |
♠AQ8
♥4
♦9765
♣J9765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠2 3-Davidson-Harken vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
620 0.00 1.00 4♥ E ♥2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
4 |
♠5
♥JT8
♦AK
♣AKT9862
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥0 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Pringle-Miller
650 0.00 1.00 5♥ S ♠2 3-Davidson-Harken vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
5 |
♠JT8753
♥JT5
♦T942
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♥7/5 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♣ 2/3♦ 4♠ 6NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 6♣ W -1 ♠J 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Miller
100 0.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 3-Davidson-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
6 |
♠AJ985
♥K
♦63
♣KQ874
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.00 0.00 3N S ♣3 3-Davidson-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
200 0.00 1.00 4♥* E -1 ♠K 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
7 |
♠AT4
♥AJ83
♦AK8
♣A92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦5 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Miller
600 0.00 1.00 3N N ♦5 3-Davidson-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
8 |
♠AT5
♥J72
♦AK63
♣T92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♥K 3-Davidson-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
110 0.00 1.00 2♣ E +1 ♦A 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
9 |
♠J43
♥J
♦JT962
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ E ♥5 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
680 0.00 1.00 4♠ E +2 ♦A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
10 |
♠KJ643
♥K9
♦A743
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 ♣K 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
200 0.00 1.00 3N S -2 ♣3 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
11 |
♠A64
♥43
♦AJ63
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♦9 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
100 0.00 1.00 3♣ S -2 ♠T 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
12 |
♠9843
♥AJ
♦9654
♣KT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Davidson-Harken
110 0.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣8 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
13 |
♠986
♥J72
♦3
♣AKQ864
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♥ 5/2NT ♦6/5 ♠6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♦A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
640 0.00 1.00 5♣ N +2 ♥T 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
14 |
♠AK2
♥Q2
♦AK874
♣A97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
150 0.00 1.00 3N N -3 ♠6 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
15 |
♠KT987
♥Q96
♦Q97
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣0 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6/5 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♦A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
110 0.00 1.00 2♥ E ♦A 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Davidson-Harken
|
16 |
♠AKJ9842
♥95
♦4
♣QJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦7 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Davidson-Harken
140 0.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
17 |
♠A9873
♥84
♦J982
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠K 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
130 0.00 1.00 3♣ W +1 ♥8 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
18 |
♠642
♥K73
♦T3
♣QJ854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 0.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦4 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Pringle-Miller
50 0.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣4 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
19 |
♠85
♥AQ65
♦Q7
♣AT743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥8 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Pringle-Miller
130 0.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♥T 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
20 |
♠AJT5
♥K853
♦T
♣AJ62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♣7 4-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Pringle-Miller
100 0.00 1.00 2♣ S -1 ♥Q 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|