1 |
♠Q97
♥954
♦J94
♣K753
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N W ♣3 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
430 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♣5 8-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pringle-Miller
430 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♣3 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
2 |
♠A865432
♥K643
♦A
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦5/6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -5 ♣9 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ N ♣J 8-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
3 |
♠-
♥T98
♦AQT954
♣J984
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣9 8-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pringle-Miller
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥K 3-Harken-Tainty vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥K 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
4 |
♠A86
♥QT3
♦A97
♣A763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ W ♥3 8-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♥3 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 1-Pringle-Miller
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♥A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
|
5 |
♠JT74
♥AJ63
♦5
♣T432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠4 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 1-Pringle-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥7 8-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♥T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
|
6 |
♠Q542
♥65
♦J943
♣K82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ W ♣Q 8-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♣2 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣Q 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
7 |
♠T9764
♥762
♦K
♣KQ93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣3 8-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Harken-Tainty
600 1.00 1.00 3N E ♦5 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
630 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣K 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
8 |
♠Q98
♥AKT5
♦K52
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 1/2♣ -/1♥ 2♠ ♦6 ♥6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N S -1 ♠4 8-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Harken-Tainty
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♣7 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pringle-Miller
|
9 |
♠AK53
♥JT63
♦A87
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♠7/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Pringle-Miller
50 1.00 1.00 2N S -1 ♣5 8-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♦Q 4-Formoso-Nelson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
10 |
♠5
♥K976
♦QJ983
♣632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♦Q 1-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♣Q 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣Q 8-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
11 |
♠K6
♥AKJ874
♦JT9
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5/6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 2.00 0.00 4♥* N ♦2 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ N ♦2 1-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
50 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦4 8-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
12 |
♠J8
♥8432
♦AT8
♣9732
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -3 ♥A 8-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ E ♥A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ W ♥2 1-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
|
13 |
♠K4
♥QJ
♦J9854
♣9762
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 4♦ 6♥ 4/3♠ 6NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 3-Harken-Tainty
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♦8 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Miller
680 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♦8 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
14 |
♠J732
♥QT84
♦AK6
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Miller
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ S +2 ♠A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♠A 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 3-Harken-Tainty
|
15 |
♠QJ
♥KJ97
♦KQ72
♣875
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N ♣4 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Miller
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦9 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 3-Harken-Tainty
50 0.00 2.00 2♣ E -1 ♠A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
|
16 |
♠KJ82
♥Q875
♦632
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♠4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
150 1.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♥2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -2 ♣J 8-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
17 |
♠2
♥QJ972
♦KQ5
♣KT86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ W ♥Q 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♠A 8-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
18 |
♠K9654
♥543
♦A5
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N ♣T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Formoso-Nelson
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♣A 8-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
19 |
♠KQ84
♥J96
♦J5
♣KJ74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N E ♥3 8-Kremers-Downing vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
120 0.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♠8 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
120 0.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♠3 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Harken-Tainty
|
20 |
♠982
♥QJ96
♦8
♣JT543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 5♠ S ♣A 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Harken-Tainty
650 1.50 0.50 5♠ S ♣A 8-Kremers-Downing vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
600 0.00 2.00 5♦ W ♠2 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
21 |
♠JT764
♥T7
♦952
♣A42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♣ 4/3♥ ♦6/5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♥A 8-Kremers-Downing vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W ♠A 1-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Harken-Tainty
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♥A 2-Morrissey-Rodrigues vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|