1 |
♠A652
♥A42
♦JT8
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ S ♠3 5-Simon-Loops vs 2-Modest-Pender
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♠8 9-Gamble-Walker vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♥Q 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Beall-Beall
100 0.50 3.50 2♠* N -1 ♦9 8-Loops-Johnson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
2 |
♠AQ
♥K76
♦AQ32
♣AJ86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 3♠* W -4 ♥6 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
300 3.00 1.00 3♠* W -2 ♥5 9-Gamble-Walker vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♦J 8-Loops-Johnson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♣7 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Beall-Beall
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♦2 5-Simon-Loops vs 2-Modest-Pender
|
3 |
♠K9532
♥QT7
♦54
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♦J 8-Loops-Johnson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +3 ♦9 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♥3 5-Simon-Loops vs 2-Modest-Pender
150 1.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♦7 9-Gamble-Walker vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ N ♥3 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Beall-Beall
|
4 |
♠A82
♥J852
♦AQ4
♣Q85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥2 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 2-Modest-Pender
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣5 9-Gamble-Walker vs 5-Simon-Loops
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +2 ♥2 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♣4 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 8-Loops-Johnson
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♠T 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 10-Beall-Beall
|
5 |
♠QJ
♥A84
♦QT732
♣975
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♠2 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
210 3.00 1.00 2N S +3 ♠2 9-Gamble-Walker vs 5-Simon-Loops
150 1.50 2.50 2N S +1 ♠2 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 10-Beall-Beall
150 1.50 2.50 1N S +2 ♠2 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 8-Loops-Johnson
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -1 ♠2 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 2-Modest-Pender
|
6 |
♠K3
♥T9874
♦A6
♣AQ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 6♥ 4/3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3/2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♦6 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 10-Beall-Beall
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦5 9-Gamble-Walker vs 5-Simon-Loops
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠8 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
400 1.00 3.00 3N N ♦5 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 8-Loops-Johnson
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♦5 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 2-Modest-Pender
|
7 |
♠AJ98
♥93
♦853
♣9854
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4N E -1 ♠4 10-Beall-Beall vs 8-Loops-Johnson
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♠4 2-Modest-Pender vs 9-Gamble-Walker
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♠4 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♣2 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
8 |
♠Q853
♥962
♦Q42
♣J53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 ♠3 10-Beall-Beall vs 8-Loops-Johnson
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♥5 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
110 1.38 2.63 3♣ E ♦9 2-Modest-Pender vs 9-Gamble-Walker
150 0.13 3.88 2♣ E +3 ♦9 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
9 |
♠K83
♥Q963
♦A93
♣K84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N S ♠4 10-Beall-Beall vs 8-Loops-Johnson
50 1.38 2.63 3N S -1 ♠4 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 6-Pringle-Miller
50 1.38 2.63 3N S -1 ♠4 2-Modest-Pender vs 9-Gamble-Walker
50 1.38 2.63 3N S -1 ♠4 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
10 |
♠KQT6
♥764
♦T76
♣T86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠4 2-Modest-Pender vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
80 3.00 1.00 1♥ S ♥Q 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♥Q 8-Loops-Johnson vs 5-Simon-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦2 10-Beall-Beall vs 9-Gamble-Walker
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦2 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
11 |
♠86
♥Q863
♦QT83
♣A62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♣K 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 6-Pringle-Miller
300 3.00 1.00 3♣* S -2 ♠J 8-Loops-Johnson vs 5-Simon-Loops
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣A 10-Beall-Beall vs 9-Gamble-Walker
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣A 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
800 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -4 ♥2 2-Modest-Pender vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
|
12 |
♠Q53
♥J9654
♦J
♣AJ42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦6 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
50 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♦6 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 6-Pringle-Miller
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♦6 2-Modest-Pender vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
120 0.50 3.50 2N E ♠4 10-Beall-Beall vs 9-Gamble-Walker
120 0.50 3.50 2N E ♦6 8-Loops-Johnson vs 5-Simon-Loops
|
13 |
♠93
♥Q986
♦QT53
♣642
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♥ ♦1 ♥6/7 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♦ 6♠ 6/5NT ♣6/5 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣6 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣6 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 5-Simon-Loops
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣2 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Modest-Pender
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣2 9-Gamble-Walker vs 6-Pringle-Miller
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♥6 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 10-Beall-Beall
|
14 |
♠3
♥KQ982
♦KT75
♣652
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1/0 ♦1 ♠0 NT1/0 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 7♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ E ♥J 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 5-Simon-Loops
480 2.50 1.50 5♠ E +1 ♥J 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 10-Beall-Beall
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♥J 9-Gamble-Walker vs 6-Pringle-Miller
980 0.50 3.50 6♠ E ♥J 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Modest-Pender
980 0.50 3.50 6♠ E ♥J 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
15 |
♠T8432
♥T7
♦4
♣A9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♦4 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 2-Modest-Pender
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♦4 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 5-Simon-Loops
100 2.50 1.50 3♠* W -1 ♦4 9-Gamble-Walker vs 6-Pringle-Miller
100 2.50 1.50 5♣ E -2 ♦K 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 10-Beall-Beall
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ W -1 ♦4 7-Hullman-Bruno vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
16 |
♠A985
♥K
♦AKT7653
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥3 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Gamble-Walker
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥3 8-Loops-Johnson vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥2 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦8 2-Modest-Pender vs 10-Beall-Beall
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ W -1 ♦A 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
17 |
♠J62
♥96
♦KT64
♣A963
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ W +1 ♦K 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 6-Pringle-Miller
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♦4 8-Loops-Johnson vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦4 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦4 2-Modest-Pender vs 10-Beall-Beall
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦4 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Gamble-Walker
|
18 |
♠K92
♥AQ984
♦AK8
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ E -3 ♥2 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Gamble-Walker
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N ♦J 1-Sedey-Millslagle vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♠A 8-Loops-Johnson vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦J 2-Modest-Pender vs 10-Beall-Beall
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♣5 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
19 |
♠JT96
♥K
♦JT32
♣AK72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠8 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 9-Gamble-Walker
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠5 2-Modest-Pender vs 8-Loops-Johnson
300 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -3 ♥K 5-Simon-Loops vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ S +1 ♠A 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
130 0.50 3.50 2♣ S +2 ♠A 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
|
20 |
♠Q743
♥AJT
♦K7
♣T943
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Modest-Pender vs 8-Loops-Johnson
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♣A 5-Simon-Loops vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♣A 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 9-Gamble-Walker
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 ♥K 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
|
21 |
♠QT73
♥AK
♦Q7
♣Q8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥3 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 9-Gamble-Walker
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥3 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 7-Hullman-Bruno
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥J 5-Simon-Loops vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -2 ♦3 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥3 2-Modest-Pender vs 8-Loops-Johnson
|
22 |
♠964
♥6
♦KT8
♣KJ9865
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ W +1 ♠4 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Modest-Pender
300 2.00 2.00 5♠* S -2 ♥K 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
300 2.00 2.00 4♠* S -2 ♥Q 10-Beall-Beall vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
650 0.13 3.88 4♥ W +1 ♠9 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 8-Loops-Johnson
|
23 |
♠9
♥AJ2
♦KJ985
♣JT73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 ♣J 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 8-Loops-Johnson
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ E ♦6 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ W ♣J 10-Beall-Beall vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
200 0.13 3.88 2♠ W +3 ♠9 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Modest-Pender
|
24 |
♠542
♥KJ
♦932
♣QT432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 1N S +2 ♦8 11-Tainty-Smyth vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♥7 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 8-Loops-Johnson
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♥2 10-Beall-Beall vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
150 0.13 3.88 1N S -3 ♥2 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Modest-Pender
|
25 |
♠A5
♥Q9764
♦T
♣KJ854
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3/2♠ ♣4 ♥4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠3 2-Modest-Pender vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠7 5-Simon-Loops vs 10-Beall-Beall
100 2.00 2.00 3♥* N -1 ♥2 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Walker
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♦T 8-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♠2 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
|
26 |
♠KT643
♥872
♦A95
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣2 ♦2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ ♥2 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♣Q 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Walker
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣A 8-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
200 2.00 2.00 5♣* E -1 ♥A 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ E ♦2 5-Simon-Loops vs 10-Beall-Beall
750 0.00 4.00 5♦* W ♠4 2-Modest-Pender vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
|
27 |
♠JT4
♥AJ7643
♦J
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ N -2 ♠5 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Sedey-Millslagle
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 ♥A 5-Simon-Loops vs 10-Beall-Beall
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♦J 2-Modest-Pender vs 11-Tainty-Smyth
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♦J 12-Schamberg-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Walker
500 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -3 ♣A 8-Loops-Johnson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|