1 |
♠83
♥73
♦J972
♣QJT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 3/2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 0.50 0.50 4♥ W ♣Q 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
420 0.50 0.50 4♥ W ♣Q 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Traback-Osborn
|
2 |
♠2
♥KQ852
♦AK74
♣432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
640 1.00 0.00 5♣ S +2 ♠T 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
100 0.00 1.00 6N N -1 ♠6 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Traback-Osborn
|
3 |
♠AKT7
♥KT2
♦KQ6
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5/6♦ 3♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥3 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 0.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥3 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Traback-Osborn
490 0.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♣5 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|
4 |
♠K9542
♥J642
♦7432
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣2 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
790 0.00 1.00 4♥* W ♠4 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 1-Traback-Osborn
|
5 |
♠T9652
♥5
♦QT
♣KQ753
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 2/-NT ♣5 ♠5 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♣K 5-Llacera-Wainer vs 1-Traback-Osborn
420 0.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠T 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Simon
|
6 |
♠AQT
♥AKT63
♦T9
♣K86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♥7 5-Llacera-Wainer vs 1-Traback-Osborn
110 0.00 1.00 2♠ S ♣7 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Simon
|
7 |
♠QT962
♥T83
♦K6
♣732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 1.00 0.00 6♠* E -3 ♥Q 5-Llacera-Wainer vs 1-Traback-Osborn
620 0.00 1.00 5♦ W +1 ♥3 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Simon
|
8 |
♠KT
♥864
♦AK76
♣T872
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 5-Llacera-Wainer vs 1-Traback-Osborn
50 0.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♦A 3-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Simon
|
9 |
♠AQ65
♥Q84
♦K52
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♦A 4-Llacera-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
110 0.00 1.00 3♦ N ♣5 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
10 |
♠AK54
♥A764
♦32
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1NT ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♠A 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
200 0.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 ♦A 4-Llacera-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|
11 |
♠-
♥JT542
♦QJ93
♣T875
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 3♦ E +2 ♥3 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
1100 0.00 1.00 2♠* S -5 ♥A 4-Llacera-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|
12 |
♠Q6
♥AK76
♦Q95
♣QJT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 0.00 1♠ E +2 ♣7 4-Llacera-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
170 0.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♥9 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
13 |
♠J7532
♥QT764
♦98
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦7/6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 1.00 0.00 1♦ S ♠9 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Simon
300 0.00 1.00 2N S -3 ♣5 1-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
14 |
♠J9
♥AJ3
♦J8
♣KQJ542
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣4 ♦5/3 ♥5 ♠7/6 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♠3 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Simon
110 0.00 1.00 2♣ N +1 ♦5 1-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
15 |
♠84
♥963
♦A973
♣QJT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣2 ♦6/5 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 0.00 5♥ S ♠K 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Simon
530 0.00 1.00 3♠* W ♥6 1-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
16 |
♠J9
♥QJT52
♦9873
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 6♠ 3NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 0.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♠5 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Simon
650 0.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 1-Traback-Osborn vs 3-Gamble-Henderson
|
17 |
♠T
♥J86
♦J97642
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4/3 ♠5/4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 ♠T 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
420 0.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠T 4-Llacera-Simon vs 1-Traback-Osborn
|
18 |
♠AKQ4
♥Q982
♦A2
♣965
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 0.00 2N W ♠A 4-Llacera-Simon vs 1-Traback-Osborn
150 0.00 1.00 2N W +1 ♠A 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|
19 |
♠AK984
♥J54
♦9
♣AT73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♥ 5♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 1.00 0.00 5♦* W -3 ♠A 4-Llacera-Simon vs 1-Traback-Osborn
450 0.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦K 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|
20 |
♠75
♥Q864
♦T63
♣Q754
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3/5 ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2/-NT ♥6 ♠5/4 NT8/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 0.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 ♣9 4-Llacera-Simon vs 1-Traback-Osborn
100 0.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 ♣9 6-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Llacera-Wainer
|