1 |
♠632
♥63
♦7532
♣6432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3/-NT ♣5 NT9/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 ♥6 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Black-Sterling
150 2.00 1.00 2N E +1 ♣7 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♣2 5-Loops-Walker vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
170 0.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♣2 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
2 |
♠AKQ75
♥7
♦J98
♣KT53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♦6 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣9 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♣9 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Loops
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♣9 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Black-Sterling
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♣4 5-Loops-Walker vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
3 |
♠KT98
♥Q86
♦AT65
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♣J 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♣J 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Loops
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣J 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Black-Sterling
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♣J 5-Loops-Walker vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
4 |
♠AJ75
♥KT762
♦-
♣Q732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♦* E -1 ♠3 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Black-Sterling
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♠3 5-Loops-Walker vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
200 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♦Q 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
500 0.00 3.00 4♥* N -2 ♦Q 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
5 |
♠87632
♥T
♦KQ653
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Black-Sterling
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦3 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Walker
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦2 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
100 1.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
6 |
♠T9
♥JT76
♦QT87
♣K62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦9 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Black-Sterling
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦3 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Walker
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦3 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦2 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
7 |
♠Q7
♥8
♦952
♣AKJ8752
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/1♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♦6 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Loops
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠J 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Walker
150 1.00 2.00 4♣ N +1 ♠3 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠4 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
8 |
♠K8
♥Q65
♦J964
♣Q974
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3/2 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -4 ♦A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Black-Sterling
100 2.00 1.00 5♣* W -1 ♦5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Loops
50 1.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦4 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Loops-Walker
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ W ♦4 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
9 |
♠J85
♥A7
♦AJ7654
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ -/1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N W ♦6 7-Slinger-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
630 2.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♦6 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦6 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
800 0.00 3.00 5♥* S -4 ♠A 5-Loops-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
10 |
♠943
♥72
♦JT3
♣KQ976
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ E ♣2 5-Loops-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E ♥5 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♠J 7-Slinger-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
630 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣Q 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
11 |
♠AQ953
♥AT4
♦K73
♣97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦A 7-Slinger-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣8 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ N ♥2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣3 5-Loops-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
12 |
♠A5
♥AQJ83
♦732
♣QT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦K 7-Slinger-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦K 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦K 5-Loops-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦K 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
13 |
♠KT42
♥76
♦JT932
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦5 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣K 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
200 1.00 2.00 1♥ S +4 ♦6 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♦A 5-Loops-Walker vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
14 |
♠874
♥762
♦K62
♣AQT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠8 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠4 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E ♠A 5-Loops-Walker vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
15 |
♠AQJT9
♥9
♦A8
♣AT754
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 1/2♥ ♣2/3 ♠3 NT2/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥K 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ N ♥K 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.50 1.50 1♠ N +2 ♥K 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥K 5-Loops-Walker vs 7-Slinger-Loops
|
16 |
♠J84
♥AJ742
♦843
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♠J 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♠4 5-Loops-Walker vs 7-Slinger-Loops
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♥T 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♥T 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
17 |
♠Q
♥643
♦T842
♣T9542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦2 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦T 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Loops-Walker
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦2 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
430 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♦2 7-Slinger-Loops vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
18 |
♠JT5
♥A86
♦AJ854
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♦ N -1 ♣3 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
150 1.50 1.50 1N W +2 ♦5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
150 1.50 1.50 1N W +2 ♦5 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Loops-Walker
210 0.00 3.00 1N W +4 ♦5 7-Slinger-Loops vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
19 |
♠A84
♥AT94
♦AKJ
♣964
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.00 0.00 2♥* E -4 ♣J 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
430 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥Q 7-Slinger-Loops vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
400 0.50 2.50 3N N ♥6 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Loops-Walker
400 0.50 2.50 3N N ♥5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
20 |
♠KT85
♥J86
♦AJ54
♣32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♣3 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♠5 6-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
100 1.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 ♠4 7-Slinger-Loops vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
200 0.00 3.00 2♣ S -2 ♦7 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 5-Loops-Walker
|
21 |
♠AJ94
♥-
♦Q8764
♣KT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠2/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦2 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♠K 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
200 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♥8 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Loops-Walker
590 0.00 3.00 4♥* W ♦5 7-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
22 |
♠KQ3
♥A8643
♦J2
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠J 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♠J 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Loops-Walker
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦9 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
150 0.00 3.00 3N S -3 ♣8 7-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
23 |
♠A94
♥AK4
♦T93
♣Q732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 1.00 3N N ♠7 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
600 2.00 1.00 3N N ♠7 7-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
600 2.00 1.00 3N N ♠7 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
100 0.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♠7 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Loops-Walker
|
24 |
♠95
♥AKQJT65
♦AK
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ N ♠A 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ N ♦9 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♦9 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Loops-Walker
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♦9 7-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Johnson
|
25 |
♠AQ6
♥QJ9
♦QT8
♣T982
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 3♠ -/2NT ♥5/6 NT5/8 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥2 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥2 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Slinger-Loops
100 0.00 3.00 1N E -1 ♠7 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
26 |
♠AJT85
♥KJ3
♦53
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 5♠ 1/4NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4/3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 4♥* E -3 ♠K 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Slinger-Loops
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥7 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥7 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥7 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Walker
|
27 |
♠J9763
♥K9
♦K92
♣A93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥Q 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Slinger-Loops
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣4 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Walker
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥3 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|
28 |
♠7
♥A972
♦AQT4
♣A872
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 3♦ 5/4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 ♠3 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Loops-Walker
120 2.00 1.00 2N S ♠2 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ S ♠2 8-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 7-Slinger-Loops
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ E -2 ♦9 2-Nathanson-Johnson vs 6-Gamble-Henderson
|