1 |
♠94
♥A93
♦Q865
♣9874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♥5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Winham-Stone
90 2.00 1.00 1N S ♥5 8-Modest-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
50 1.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♥5 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 3.00 1N S -4 ♥5 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-Cowen-Loops
|
2 |
♠K84
♥652
♦AKQ654
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ N ♥A 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ N ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Winham-Stone
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦J 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-Cowen-Loops
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦8 8-Modest-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
|
3 |
♠6
♥J63
♦A98632
♣Q76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ N ♠Q 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-Cowen-Loops
100 2.00 1.00 4♦ S -2 ♣9 8-Modest-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Winham-Stone
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦Q 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
4 |
♠KJ8752
♥J3
♦73
♣AT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥8 8-Modest-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
100 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♠7 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
100 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♦7 6-Winham-Stone vs 7-Cowen-Loops
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♥A 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠A8762
♥T84
♦742
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦6 6-Winham-Stone vs 7-Cowen-Loops
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠3 8-Modest-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣3 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
400 0.00 3.00 3N E ♦T 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠QT6532
♥QT8
♦J5
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 5♣ W +1 ♠5 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.50 0.50 5♣ E +1 ♠A 4-Harken-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
630 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♠5 6-Winham-Stone vs 7-Cowen-Loops
690 0.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♦3 8-Modest-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
|
7 |
♠J92
♥J3
♦KQJ86
♣753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ 2/1NT ♣3/2 ♦6/5 ♥5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♠8 8-Modest-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ N ♠3 7-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ S ♠3 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Winham-Stone
200 0.00 3.00 4♥* S -1 ♠5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
|
8 |
♠4
♥K762
♦AQT
♣KQT95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♥ 5♠ 3/4NT ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♦8 8-Modest-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
450 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♦4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥J 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Winham-Stone
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S ♦4 7-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
|
9 |
♠KQT97
♥A9843
♦3
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 4♠* W -3 ♥A 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Winham-Stone
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣3 7-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♣8 8-Modest-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♦3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
|
10 |
♠AT98
♥87
♦AK4
♣9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1♠ W -2 ♥8 6-Winham-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Cowen-Loops
90 1.00 2.00 1N E ♦8 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♥A 8-Modest-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
11 |
♠A6
♥AQJ5
♦J65
♣J943
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2/1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ N +1 ♠K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Cowen-Loops
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 8-Modest-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♣3 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 6-Winham-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
12 |
♠QJ743
♥K73
♦AQJ6
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣0 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ W +1 ♣T 8-Modest-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣T 6-Winham-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ W +2 ♠Q 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
|
13 |
♠JT6
♥KQ7
♦T93
♣QJ62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠4 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
660 1.50 1.50 4N S +1 ♦5 8-Modest-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
660 1.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♦5 6-Winham-Stone vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
100 0.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♣A 7-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
14 |
♠742
♥Q53
♦J2
♣QJ962
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4/2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♠7 6-Winham-Stone vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♠2 8-Modest-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 2.00 2♦ E +3 ♠A 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
180 0.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♣6 7-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
15 |
♠T43
♥Q86542
♦Q7
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4/3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠7 6-Winham-Stone vs 1-Avenmarg-Davidson
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣6 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣2 8-Modest-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♠J 7-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
16 |
♠K96
♥AQ2
♦752
♣AQ65
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 1N N -1 ♥3 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 0.50 1N N -1 ♥3 8-Modest-Loops vs 6-Winham-Stone
100 1.00 2.00 1N N -2 ♥3 7-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W ♦2 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
17 |
♠986
♥J8
♦5
♣Q987543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ W +1 ♣8 7-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ E +1 ♣J 8-Modest-Loops vs 6-Winham-Stone
150 2.00 1.00 5♣ N -3 ♥Q 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
400 0.00 3.00 5♦ E ♣K 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠9853
♥AQ862
♦A76
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦T 8-Modest-Loops vs 6-Winham-Stone
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♣3 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥J 7-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Nathanson-Stone
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ W ♥A 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠T92
♥KQJ5
♦953
♣K83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠4 8-Modest-Loops vs 7-Cowen-Loops
100 2.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♥4 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Winham-Stone
110 0.50 2.50 2♦ W +1 ♥K 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
110 0.50 2.50 2♦ W +1 ♥K 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠T63
♥KT4
♦AJ82
♣A65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥9 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥3 8-Modest-Loops vs 7-Cowen-Loops
170 1.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♥A 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Winham-Stone
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ S ♣J 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠KT43
♥T3
♦J7
♣AJT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦6 2-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Winham-Stone
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣6 4-Harken-Harken vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦4 1-Avenmarg-Davidson vs 3-Rodrigues-Morrissey
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦6 8-Modest-Loops vs 7-Cowen-Loops
|