1 |
♠AKT65
♥A94
♦A42
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 3-Pringle-Miller vs 7-Davidson-Loops
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|
2 |
♠5
♥AKJ2
♦AT874
♣K62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3/4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
50 1.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥8 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥8 3-Pringle-Miller vs 7-Davidson-Loops
|
3 |
♠KJ
♥K5
♦J764
♣KQJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S ♣4 3-Pringle-Miller vs 7-Davidson-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♣6 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
500 0.00 2.00 4♠* S -3 ♣4 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
|
4 |
♠Q86
♥K32
♦A
♣AQJT94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 5♣ N ♠J 3-Pringle-Miller vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♥T 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Davidson-Loops
|
5 |
♠2
♥KJ754
♦T54
♣7652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦Q 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♠2 3-Pringle-Miller vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣A 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Davidson-Loops
|
6 |
♠A952
♥K9
♦AK95
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♦4 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 7-Davidson-Loops
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ N +1 ♠J 3-Pringle-Miller vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
50 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠J 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠J63
♥A73
♦QJ764
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦Q 7-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
600 0.00 2.00 3N W ♣9 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠K2
♥A8753
♦T97
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣Q 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ S ♠A 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ S ♠A 7-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
9 |
♠K876
♥75
♦87
♣AQT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♥A 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W ♣9 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W ♦8 7-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
10 |
♠T42
♥J7632
♦JT9
♣65
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 6N W -5 ♥3 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 7-Davidson-Loops
600 1.00 1.00 3N E ♣7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦J 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 3-Pringle-Miller
|
11 |
♠J2
♥KQJ8
♦J72
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣2 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 3-Pringle-Miller
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣3 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 7-Davidson-Loops
|
12 |
♠A6
♥AQ43
♦AQ5
♣T832
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♣Q 5-Rodrigues-Loops vs 7-Davidson-Loops
200 1.00 1.00 2N N -2 ♣A 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 3-Pringle-Miller
300 0.00 2.00 2N N -3 ♥J 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠AK9
♥KJ975
♦Q64
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ N ♥8 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♥8 7-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♠7 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Miller
|
14 |
♠AQ653
♥KJ
♦AJ8
♣K75
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3N N -2 ♦5 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ S -2 ♦K 7-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
150 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 ♦5 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Miller
|
15 |
♠Q984
♥AK6
♦JT93
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♥9 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Miller
100 1.00 1.00 2♦ N -1 ♥J 7-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ W ♦J 6-Stone-Nathanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠AT
♥J7
♦KQJ5
♣A8543
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥6 7-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
210 1.00 1.00 2N S +3 ♥2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ S +2 ♥K 3-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
|
17 |
♠K
♥AKT
♦T53
♣AKJ842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 1.50 0.50 6N S ♠4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
990 1.50 0.50 6N N ♥2 7-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
440 0.00 2.00 5♣ N +2 ♥5 3-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
|
18 |
♠95
♥AT7652
♦T74
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦A 7-Davidson-Loops vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.50 1.50 3N W +4 ♠9 3-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Traback-Tidmore
400 0.50 1.50 5♣ E ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
|
19 |
♠AQ4
♥AK8732
♦J
♣JT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♠J 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Miller
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♣6 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|
20 |
♠AKQ9
♥J93
♦A3
♣J543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♦6 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣T 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
500 0.00 2.00 4♥* S -2 ♣T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Miller
|
21 |
♠A6
♥Q7652
♦74
♣9832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♠J 4-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Rodrigues-Loops
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♦8 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Miller
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♦8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Stone-Nathanson
|