1 |
♠KJ864
♥T3
♦K9654
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Harken-Tainty
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♣4 3-Stone-Davidson vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ W +1 ♥T 8-Modest-Pender vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
2 |
♠T62
♥852
♦QT6
♣AT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♥2 8-Modest-Pender vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♦6 3-Stone-Davidson vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
3 |
♠A965
♥KJ93
♦AJ73
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 7♥ 1/2♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 2.00 0.00 6♥ S +1 ♣4 8-Modest-Pender vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
510 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +3 ♣3 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Harken-Tainty
480 0.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♦T 3-Stone-Davidson vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
|
4 |
♠J5
♥52
♦KQ873
♣9872
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥8 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
600 0.00 2.00 3N N ♦6 8-Modest-Pender vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠QJT
♥T6
♦K83
♣QT543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♠7 8-Modest-Pender vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 0.50 1♣ E -1 ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♥2 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
6 |
♠AK
♥QT5
♦AK7432
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.00 0.00 6♥ S ♦Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
480 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠Q 8-Modest-Pender vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ S ♣T 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
7 |
♠K972
♥KJ5
♦-
♣Q65432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4/5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 2/3♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 8-Modest-Pender vs 3-Stone-Davidson
90 1.00 1.00 1N W ♣4 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
110 0.00 2.00 1♦ W +2 ♣6 4-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠9
♥K9764
♦A764
♣963
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5/4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣6 4-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♥2 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
50 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♠9 8-Modest-Pender vs 3-Stone-Davidson
|
9 |
♠32
♥A7643
♦7
♣AKJ54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠T 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
460 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦3 8-Modest-Pender vs 3-Stone-Davidson
150 0.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♥K 4-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠J3
♥AKQ
♦K2
♣J98752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT4/5 |
EW: 5♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥9 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stone-Davidson
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♥9 8-Modest-Pender vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
11 |
♠J6
♥Q942
♦J9
♣KQT92
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stone-Davidson
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ W ♦8 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ E ♥T 8-Modest-Pender vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
12 |
♠KT72
♥K83
♦A5
♣AJ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣K 8-Modest-Pender vs 4-Harken-Tainty
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stone-Davidson
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♥Q 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
13 |
♠92
♥AQT852
♦2
♣QT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣7 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦3 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Stone-Davidson
|
14 |
♠73
♥AQJT2
♦A98
♣Q83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Stone-Davidson
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 ♠K 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 ♠8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
15 |
♠J9
♥532
♦K6432
♣A63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♠J 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♦T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Stone-Davidson
|
16 |
♠AT832
♥A73
♦A84
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦3 8-Modest-Pender vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦T 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣A 3-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
17 |
♠A976
♥KJ8652
♦-
♣Q64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 5/6♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠J 8-Modest-Pender vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠J 3-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠J 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
18 |
♠AJT43
♥-
♦KQ97
♣Q963
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2/1♥ 3/4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣A 8-Modest-Pender vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♠4 7-Avenmarg-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣5 3-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
19 |
♠AQ983
♥7
♦AQ75
♣A65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠J 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 3-Stone-Davidson
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♥7 8-Modest-Pender vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠J 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠KT9873
♥2
♦2
♣AJT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -2 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -2 ♥A 8-Modest-Pender vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
500 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -2 ♥A 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 3-Stone-Davidson
|
21 |
♠A2
♥QJ72
♦QT972
♣75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ -/1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♦6/7 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣3 1-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 3-Stone-Davidson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♠Q 8-Modest-Pender vs 7-Avenmarg-Downing
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦8 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|