1 |
♠KQT
♥AQ62
♦AQ87
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣J 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♦4 12-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ N ♥T 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦4 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
400 1.00 4.00 3N N ♥T 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♥T 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Zinman-Chase
|
2 |
♠KJ32
♥J9
♦K6532
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♣ E +3 ♠8 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
170 4.50 0.50 2♣ E +4 ♠5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣Q 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
430 2.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠4 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Zinman-Chase
460 0.50 4.50 3N E +2 ♠5 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
460 0.50 4.50 3N E +2 ♠5 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
|
3 |
♠A74
♥9
♦KQ9876
♣852
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 ♥9 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
100 4.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♠2 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♣A 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
150 2.00 3.00 1♠ S -3 ♥J 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
180 1.00 4.00 2N E +2 ♠2 6-Pringle-Miller vs 10-Zinman-Chase
600 0.00 5.00 3N E ♥4 12-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
4 |
♠J643
♥87
♦J9
♣AJ832
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣4 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
100 3.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♦3 6-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠2 1-Black-Sterling vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♣6 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 10-Zinman-Chase
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 ♠5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
200 0.50 4.50 2N N -2 ♥2 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠AQ4
♥KQJ932
♦T
♣KT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 5♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦K 12-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
500 4.00 1.00 5♦* E -3 ♥8 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
300 3.00 2.00 5♦* E -2 ♣A 1-Black-Sterling vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
50 2.00 3.00 4♦ E -1 ♥8 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 10-Zinman-Chase
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ N -1 ♦K 6-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 ♦K 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
6 |
♠K965
♥AJ5
♦J98
♣T52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2/3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♦J 6-Pringle-Miller vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
200 4.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♥2 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
100 3.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♠5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
90 2.00 3.00 1N E ♣3 1-Black-Sterling vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ E ♦8 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 10-Zinman-Chase
150 0.00 5.00 1N E +2 ♣4 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
7 |
♠AK865
♥KT
♦T2
♣A873
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ N ♦5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♠A 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ E ♠9 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Pringle-Miller
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ E ♠9 10-Zinman-Chase vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ E ♠2 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ E ♠2 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
8 |
♠3
♥KQJ94
♦A7642
♣73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣0 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ E +1 ♥5 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Pringle-Miller
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ E +1 ♥2 12-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 10-Zinman-Chase vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
9 |
♠KT84
♥643
♦Q8
♣Q942
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3/1♥ 1/-♠ 2/-NT ♦5/4 ♠7/6 NT8/6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♣A 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Pringle-Miller
180 4.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♦6 10-Zinman-Chase vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
130 3.00 2.00 3♣ S +1 ♦6 12-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
110 2.00 3.00 3♣ S ♣6 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ W -1 ♣2 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 ♦T 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠986
♥85
♦KJ6532
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 7♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.50 0.50 4♠ E +2 ♣7 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Smith-Smith
680 4.50 0.50 4♥ E +2 ♣7 12-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
690 3.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♣7 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 1-Black-Sterling
710 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +3 ♠9 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 6-Pringle-Miller
710 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +3 ♣J 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
1430 0.00 5.00 6♠ E ♦9 10-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠2
♥AK932
♦AJT6
♣K32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥8 12-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣6 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 1-Black-Sterling
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♥6 10-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ S ♣T 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ N ♣Q 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♥6 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
12 |
♠AKQ6
♥A643
♦KJ76
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣Q 10-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
90 3.50 1.50 1N W ♠A 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 6-Pringle-Miller
90 3.50 1.50 1N W ♣3 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 1-Black-Sterling
120 1.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♠A 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 5-Smith-Smith
120 1.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♠A 12-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
300 0.00 5.00 2♦ N -3 ♣Q 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
|
13 |
♠KT98
♥5
♦J763
♣AT86
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 1♥ 1♠ -/1NT ♣4/5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♣6 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pringle-Miller
200 4.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♣3 12-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 1.50 3.50 3N W -1 ♠T 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
100 1.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♠8 1-Black-Sterling vs 10-Zinman-Chase
100 1.50 3.50 2N W -1 ♣6 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
100 1.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♣3 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
|
14 |
♠AKT6
♥QJT3
♦K82
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠5 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pringle-Miller
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠5 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
400 2.50 2.50 3N N ♠5 1-Black-Sterling vs 10-Zinman-Chase
400 2.50 2.50 3N N ♠5 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
150 1.00 4.00 2N N +1 ♠5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 0.00 5.00 2N N -1 ♥7 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
|
15 |
♠KQJT2
♥Q87
♦KJ4
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 5/6♦ 3/4♥ 5/6♠ 2/6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 5.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♥4 12-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
720 2.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♥2 1-Black-Sterling vs 10-Zinman-Chase
720 2.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♥2 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
720 2.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♣T 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
720 2.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♣6 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
710 0.00 5.00 4♠ N +3 ♦7 9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pringle-Miller
|
16 |
♠83
♥J94
♦Q986
♣J953
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♠9 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
50 4.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♠9 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
50 4.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♠9 12-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥A 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥8 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 10-Zinman-Chase
120 0.00 5.00 2N W ♦6 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠J6
♥QT9764
♦J9
♣AT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.00 4♥* N ♣3 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 10-Zinman-Chase
450 3.50 1.50 5♥ S ♣K 12-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
450 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠3 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
430 2.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♠4 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ N +2 ♣6 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ N +1 ♦3 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
|
18 |
♠AT7
♥KQ5
♦T76
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1/2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦4 12-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Pringle-Miller
50 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦K 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
50 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣2 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ E ♦5 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 10-Zinman-Chase
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ E ♣2 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♣2 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
|
19 |
♠T2
♥K85
♦84
♣KJ9732
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.50 0.50 5♣ S ♥J 10-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
400 4.50 0.50 5♣ S ♥J 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
150 3.00 2.00 4♣ N +1 ♠5 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 2.00 3.00 5♣ S -1 ♥J 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
170 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♠8 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
200 0.00 5.00 3♥ E +2 ♠A 12-Jones-Henderson vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
|
20 |
♠A85
♥T82
♦A93
♣AK63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♣9 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
90 4.00 1.00 1N N ♣Q 10-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
100 3.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥A 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Black-Sterling
200 1.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♥A 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
200 1.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♥A 12-Jones-Henderson vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
200 1.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♣3 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠QJ9742
♥5
♦K73
♣754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠Q 10-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠T 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠T 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦T 12-Jones-Henderson vs 7-MacGregor-Kakalec
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦T 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♣4 6-Pringle-Miller vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
|
22 |
♠653
♥KQT7
♦942
♣AT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 12-Jones-Henderson vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦T 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 2.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♦4 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♥A 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦3 10-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 ♦A 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠KQT93
♥Q2
♦94
♣J943
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 3/2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♠5 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ W ♠K 12-Jones-Henderson vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♣3 10-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
600 2.00 3.00 3N E ♠5 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 5-Smith-Smith
630 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠3 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♠K 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
24 |
♠KQ7
♥QJ
♦K942
♣Q872
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ S ♠2 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 4.00 1.00 1N N ♠3 11-Avenmarg-Ray vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 2.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♥A 6-Pringle-Miller vs 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey
50 2.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♥5 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♥A 12-Jones-Henderson vs 8-Tainty-Tainty
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 ♥9 10-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Llacera-Llacera
|
25 |
♠A862
♥KQ63
♦84
♣K63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♥5 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥T 12-Jones-Henderson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣9 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ S ♥5 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Pringle-Miller
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♣Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 10-Zinman-Chase
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -2 ♥T 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
|
26 |
♠KT82
♥A52
♦A52
♣A93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♠ 4NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥9 12-Jones-Henderson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥9 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥9 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥9 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥9 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Pringle-Miller
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ S +1 ♥9 5-Smith-Smith vs 10-Zinman-Chase
|
27 |
♠9654
♥K54
♦76
♣AQT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♦* W -2 ♥4 4-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
170 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +2 ♥7 8-Tainty-Tainty vs 6-Pringle-Miller
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ S ♦5 7-MacGregor-Kakalec vs 3-Badawi-Kuhlmann
50 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♦2 2-Rodrigues-Morrissey vs 11-Avenmarg-Ray
50 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♦2 5-Smith-Smith vs 10-Zinman-Chase
50 1.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♦5 12-Jones-Henderson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|