1 |
♠74
♥KJ
♦J8642
♣8652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ S -2 ♠K 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 6-Modest-Miller
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♣2 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣2 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
2 |
♠T8743
♥Q43
♦A4
♣983
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦J 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
400 2.00 1.00 3N E ♦J 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠J 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦J 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
3 |
♠KQ96
♥KT732
♦T54
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♥ N +1 ♣A 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♠2 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ N ♣A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♠2 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
4 |
♠Q74
♥KJ752
♦JT
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♥3 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
120 2.00 1.00 2N N ♠A 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
100 0.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♠A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
100 0.50 2.50 3♦ N -1 ♠9 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
5 |
♠JT7
♥T62
♦J94
♣J983
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♣A 6-Modest-Miller vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
50 2.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♣3 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E ♦K 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠T73
♥K863
♦97
♣AT96
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3/4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♠6 6-Modest-Miller vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
630 2.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♠6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
660 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♦2 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
660 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♦2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
|
7 |
♠Q983
♥QJ
♦AKQT5
♣T2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4/5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♦9 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦3 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠K 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♦A 6-Modest-Miller vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
|
8 |
♠J
♥A87542
♦AT76
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠A 6-Modest-Miller vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♥T 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♣A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
|
9 |
♠AQ
♥QJ62
♦Q72
♣J954
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♣2 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♣2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣2 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♦5 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
10 |
♠KT9753
♥532
♦2
♣K52
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6/5 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣9 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
230 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +4 ♣4 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♦7 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Miller
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♦K 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
11 |
♠A963
♥763
♦A32
♣AT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♦J 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Miller
50 2.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♥J 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
300 1.00 2.00 4♠* N -2 ♣2 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
1100 0.00 3.00 4♠* N -5 ♦7 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
12 |
♠Q9
♥9
♦K9863
♣AJ874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥K 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥7 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 6-Modest-Miller
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
13 |
♠KJ62
♥A53
♦A3
♣QJ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♦2 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
660 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♣T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
630 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥4 6-Modest-Miller vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♦2 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
14 |
♠J3
♥J754
♦A5
♣AKQ72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 5/4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥T 6-Modest-Miller vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♦Q 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥K 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S ♦Q 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠J93
♥Q732
♦Q97
♣T73
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥Q 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
400 2.00 1.00 3N E ♥J 6-Modest-Miller vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
430 0.50 2.50 4N E ♥J 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
430 0.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♥J 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
16 |
♠AQ9
♥J3
♦K764
♣AQ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♥A 5-Martin-Wesolowski vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
150 2.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♥A 6-Modest-Miller vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♣5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
50 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥A 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
17 |
♠AJ
♥QT4
♦KQJ82
♣K86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5/6♦ 3♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♣3 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣Q 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣Q 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
460 1.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♣7 6-Modest-Miller vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
|
18 |
♠A5
♥T943
♦AQ
♣QJ743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ E ♠5 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ E ♠4 6-Modest-Miller vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣9 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
|
19 |
♠7
♥T93
♦AQ753
♣AQ63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♥Q 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♥Q 6-Modest-Miller vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♥Q 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ W ♠7 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
|
20 |
♠6
♥KT8
♦K32
♣QJT853
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2/1 ♥1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♥8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
200 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♣Q 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ E ♠J 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ E ♦J 6-Modest-Miller vs 1-Pringle-Pulliam
|
21 |
♠KQT
♥KQJ942
♦A82
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.00 0.00 6♥ N +1 ♣T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Modest-Miller
710 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +3 ♦6 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
710 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +3 ♣T 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
710 1.00 2.00 4♥ N +3 ♣T 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
22 |
♠Q876
♥K72
♦9
♣AK972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N N ♥J 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣T 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -4 ♥A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
23 |
♠KT7642
♥T2
♦92
♣JT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Modest-Miller
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♣J 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
150 0.50 2.50 3♦ W +2 ♥T 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
150 0.50 2.50 2♦ W +3 ♥T 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
|
24 |
♠AQ85
♥T3
♦632
♣J843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ -/2NT ♣5 ♠5 NT6/8 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♣2 7-Friedberg-Boggs vs 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠T 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♠4 3-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Schilling-Davidson
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
25 |
♠Q7
♥A52
♦Q954
♣Q542
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♣2 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Modest-Miller
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♦4 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
170 1.00 2.00 1♠ W +3 ♣2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
|
26 |
♠Q5
♥Q854
♦97
♣J8752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♥A 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♥A 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♥A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣6 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Modest-Miller
|
27 |
♠QT42
♥97
♦T9842
♣AT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦K 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Modest-Miller
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦K 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
50 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♥2 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
|
28 |
♠QT
♥Q54
♦QJ92
♣AT32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥2 1-Pringle-Pulliam vs 3-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♥2 4-Schilling-Davidson vs 5-Martin-Wesolowski
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♦8 2-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 6-Modest-Miller
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♥6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Friedberg-Boggs
|