| 1 |
♠KQT9
♥J762
♦T42
♣A9
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ ♠3/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥K 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Cowen-Loops
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♦7 3-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 2.00 1N E -2 ♠5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 2 |
♠AQT7
♥K7
♦A854
♣J87
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S ♠5 3-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥Q 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Cowen-Loops
|
| 3 |
♠AQJ96
♥32
♦QJ976
♣T
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ N -2 ♣6 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Cowen-Loops
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♣6 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -3 ♥A 3-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 4 |
♠J3
♥A94
♦J9754
♣JT6
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ S +2 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♣A 3-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Harken-Harken
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♣A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Cowen-Loops
|
| 5 |
♠JT2
♥KQ
♦AJ832
♣763
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♣T 3-Davidson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Loops
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♣T 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 6 |
♠JT43
♥AJT7
♦T
♣T962
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 NT4/2 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥7 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.00 2.00 3N W ♥7 3-Davidson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Loops
|
| 7 |
♠JT942
♥J982
♦AQJ8
♣-
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 3-Davidson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Loops
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 8 |
♠A832
♥T7
♦A62
♣KT92
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥4 3-Davidson-Stone vs 4-Cowen-Loops
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♥6 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 9 |
♠T87652
♥96
♦T82
♣K4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 5/6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠4 4-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E ♣J 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Davidson-Stone
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠8 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 10 |
♠AKQ8
♥QJ6
♦K3
♣T763
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥8 4-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♠4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♠7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Davidson-Stone
|
| 11 |
♠KQ7
♥Q9754
♦K6
♣T92
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣A 4-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Davidson-Stone
|
| 12 |
♠AT64
♥QT984
♦54
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♠8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Davidson-Stone
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♣4 4-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Harken-Harken
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 13 |
♠AQJ
♥AT862
♦853
♣93
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Loops
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♣2 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Davidson-Stone
|
| 14 |
♠JT3
♥Q862
♦2
♣J5432
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♠2 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♠2 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Loops
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Davidson-Stone
|
| 15 |
♠9643
♥973
♦T5
♣QJT2
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ E ♥Q 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Davidson-Stone
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ E ♥Q 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Loops
480 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣3 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 16 |
♠K743
♥K6
♦K982
♣K92
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N S ♥J 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Cowen-Loops
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Davidson-Stone
670 0.00 2.00 2♠* E ♣2 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 17 |
♠J65
♥A76
♦Q9652
♣84
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6/7 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.50 0.50 1N N ♦T 4-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
90 1.50 0.50 1N N ♦3 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
80 0.00 2.00 1♥ S ♣6 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Davidson-Stone
|
| 18 |
♠K753
♥AKJ2
♦A8
♣865
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N E ♠A 4-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ W ♥A 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Davidson-Stone
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♥7 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 19 |
♠Q82
♥QT74
♦Q875
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2/1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ S ♥8 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Davidson-Stone
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ S ♦6 4-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♦2 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 20 |
♠Q762
♥94
♦762
♣A972
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣8 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥3 2-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Davidson-Stone
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣8 4-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|