1 |
♠A764
♥A64
♦KQT92
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N S ♦7 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
120 3.50 0.50 1N S +1 ♣K 9-Davidson-Stone vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣K 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 11-Harken-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♠J 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 10-Walker-Loops
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -2 ♣K 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠7642
♥AKJT85
♦3
♣98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ NT6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦8 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 11-Harken-Harken
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♣5 9-Davidson-Stone vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S ♠J 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣5 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 10-Walker-Loops
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣7 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
|
3 |
♠AT984
♥84
♦A874
♣93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4/5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 3.50 0.50 3N S +4 ♥6 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
520 3.50 0.50 3N S +4 ♥6 11-Harken-Harken vs 4-Loops-Cowen
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 ♥6 9-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 1.00 3.00 4♦ S +2 ♥6 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 10-Walker-Loops
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♦K 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
|
4 |
♠J97543
♥4
♦QJ9
♣A72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 ♥T 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -2 ♣2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 10-Walker-Loops
200 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -2 ♥A 11-Harken-Harken vs 4-Loops-Cowen
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦T 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
790 0.00 4.00 4♥* E ♠K 9-Davidson-Stone vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠983
♥QT2
♦7643
♣JT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 6♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 9-Davidson-Stone
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 ♥2 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥A 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Cowen
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♥A 11-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
6 |
♠T
♥JT72
♦AJ842
♣Q82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 9-Davidson-Stone
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 11-Harken-Harken vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 ♥3 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Cowen
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
|
7 |
♠7
♥AJ9
♦AQJ95
♣KT83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3/4 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♦4 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Loops-Cowen
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠8 10-Walker-Loops vs 9-Davidson-Stone
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♦A 11-Harken-Harken vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♦4 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
500 0.00 4.00 4♦* N -2 ♠J 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠K65
♥T72
♦843
♣9543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2/1♦ 6♥ 4/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♦4 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♣3 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Loops-Cowen
430 2.00 2.00 4N W ♣3 11-Harken-Harken vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
460 1.00 3.00 4N W +1 ♠6 10-Walker-Loops vs 9-Davidson-Stone
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♦5 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
9 |
♠Q3
♥J3
♦QT76
♣KQ954
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 1N W -4 ♦6 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Walker-Loops
120 3.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♦6 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 11-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦6 9-Davidson-Stone vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +2 ♣K 4-Loops-Cowen vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +2 ♣5 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
10 |
♠QJT6432
♥985
♦KQ
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♠5 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Walker-Loops
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦5 4-Loops-Cowen vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♠A 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♦4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 11-Harken-Harken
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 ♦5 9-Davidson-Stone vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
|
11 |
♠98
♥KT2
♦KJT4
♣K963
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ W +3 ♠9 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 10-Walker-Loops
200 3.50 0.50 1♠ W +4 ♦4 4-Loops-Cowen vs 9-Davidson-Stone
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠8 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
|
12 |
♠KJT4
♥AK5
♦Q963
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ -/1♠ ♦4 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥J 4-Loops-Cowen vs 9-Davidson-Stone
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♥J 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ N ♥J 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 10-Walker-Loops
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ N ♥J 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♥J 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Avenmarg
|
13 |
♠AK53
♥AQJ
♦-
♣KJ7654
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♥2 10-Walker-Loops vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♣3 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 4-Loops-Cowen
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♥5 11-Harken-Harken vs 9-Davidson-Stone
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♠2 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
210 0.00 4.00 1N N +4 ♥2 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
14 |
♠QJ653
♥J8532
♦J3
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠5 11-Harken-Harken vs 9-Davidson-Stone
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♣4 10-Walker-Loops vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
150 2.00 2.00 1♦ W +4 ♠5 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
430 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥2 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 4-Loops-Cowen
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♣6 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AQ
♥KT76
♦K9
♣J9542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣8 11-Harken-Harken vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♣4 10-Walker-Loops vs 4-Loops-Cowen
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ W ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ W ♣4 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Davidson-Stone
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ W +1 ♣4 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
|
16 |
♠KT96
♥T3
♦96
♣AQJ43
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♦K 10-Walker-Loops vs 4-Loops-Cowen
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠K 11-Harken-Harken vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦K 6-Zinman-Avenmarg vs 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦K 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦2 3-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Davidson-Stone
|
17 |
♠-
♥AQJ76
♦J2
♣AQ6543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣0 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ N +2 ♣T 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 11-Harken-Harken
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ W ♣A 5-Smith-Smith vs 10-Walker-Loops
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ E ♣K 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 9-Davidson-Stone
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♦J 4-Loops-Cowen vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠T7
♥T875
♦Q2
♣AKJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♥7 12-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 9-Davidson-Stone
50 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠4 5-Smith-Smith vs 10-Walker-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠3 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-O'Neill-Smart
90 1.00 3.00 1N W ♣J 2-Wasserstrom-Osborn vs 11-Harken-Harken
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♠5 4-Loops-Cowen vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|