1 |
♠876
♥K6
♦T974
♣K764
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣A 3-Loops-Loops vs 5-Smith-Smith
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣A 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣4 2-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠K754
♥765
♦62
♣K742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 7/6♥ 1♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ W +3 ♠4 3-Loops-Loops vs 5-Smith-Smith
440 1.00 1.00 5♣ E +2 ♠T 2-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
520 0.00 2.00 4N E +3 ♠9 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠876
♥A9765
♦3
♣7542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3/4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1/2♥ 1/-NT ♣5 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠Q 2-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.00 1.00 1♠ S +1 ♣A 3-Loops-Loops vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦9 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
4 |
♠T4
♥QJ6
♦9854
♣KJT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 ♠K 3-Loops-Loops vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ W ♥6 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♥6 2-Stone-Davidson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠7652
♥AJ5
♦Q6
♣Q963
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ S +1 ♠K 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♠K 3-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.00 1.00 2♦ S +3 ♠K 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Stone-Davidson
|
6 |
♠84
♥AK72
♦Q84
♣AJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Stone-Davidson
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ E +2 ♥Q 3-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠K73
♥K86
♦Q875
♣J85
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♥ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠A 3-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠A 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Stone-Davidson
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ S ♣K 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠J96
♥JT9842
♦2
♣763
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♣Q 3-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 1.00 1♦ S -2 ♥3 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 2-Stone-Davidson
120 0.00 2.00 2N W ♥J 5-Smith-Smith vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠A7
♥AQ52
♦K974
♣642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 4♦ N +2 ♥3 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stone-Davidson
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ S +1 ♠4 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 ♠Q 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
10 |
♠AJ8
♥JT652
♦7542
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N W -1 ♥J 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Smith-Smith
120 1.00 1.00 2N W ♥5 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-Loops-Loops
130 0.00 2.00 1♣ W +3 ♦7 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stone-Davidson
|
11 |
♠T7
♥97
♦AT9874
♣AQ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♦7 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♥5 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stone-Davidson
|
12 |
♠AK2
♥Q862
♦A753
♣94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N S ♠9 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stone-Davidson
600 1.50 0.50 3N N ♠6 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♥K 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
13 |
♠AQ4
♥K9
♦Q982
♣Q876
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N E ♥7 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Stone-Davidson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W ♥9 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦A 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
14 |
♠T6
♥QJ963
♦AK74
♣63
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♦ 3♥ 1/2NT ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠8 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Stone-Davidson
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠7 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠7 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠AQ832
♥64
♦A86
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N S ♥2 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Stone-Davidson
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♥6 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 0.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♦5 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠JT7
♥KT65
♦86
♣QJ63
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N ♠2 1-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
300 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -3 ♣Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Stone-Davidson
150 0.00 2.00 2♣ S +3 ♥4 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
17 |
♠KT763
♥AT5
♦QJ83
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♥K 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.50 1.50 1N E ♥K 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 0.50 1.50 2♣ W ♠6 2-Stone-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
18 |
♠97
♥AQ2
♦K7
♣K96542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♦3 2-Stone-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Loops
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ E ♣A 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
19 |
♠976
♥72
♦8652
♣A962
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N W +1 ♠6 2-Stone-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Loops
630 1.50 0.50 3N W +1 ♣6 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♣6 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
20 |
♠K54
♥K92
♦953
♣T952
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥6 2-Stone-Davidson vs 3-Loops-Loops
180 1.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♥6 6-Rodrigues-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♥7 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Calciano-Calciano
|