1 |
♠72
♥J9642
♦AK84
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦A 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ W +2 ♠7 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
150 0.50 1.50 2♣ W +3 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
2 |
♠962
♥8543
♦64
♣AQ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ E +1 ♦K 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♦K 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♣9 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
|
3 |
♠AQT643
♥T92
♦83
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦Q 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♦Q 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
4 |
♠94
♥KJT5
♦KQ73
♣A82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 4/3NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♥2 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦T 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
100 0.00 2.00 6♥ S -1 ♥4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
|
5 |
♠QJ2
♥KQJ8762
♦-
♣AK4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 5♥ N +1 ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
650 0.50 1.50 5♥ N ♦A 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦A 6-Johnson-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
|
6 |
♠AKQ32
♥94
♦8762
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥5 6-Johnson-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -2 ♦3 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
100 0.50 1.50 3N N -2 ♥5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
|
7 |
♠KT43
♥A743
♦86
♣653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ S ♥Q 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 6-Johnson-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
|
8 |
♠K753
♥QJT2
♦2
♣J865
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥3 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ N ♦Q 6-Johnson-Loops vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
|
9 |
♠872
♥8
♦A85
♣KT9543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -4 ♠2 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Johnson-Loops
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♣Q 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♣Q 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
|
10 |
♠92
♥QJ852
♦K9732
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ S -1 ♠J 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Johnson-Loops
200 1.00 1.00 4♣ S -2 ♣J 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
300 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -3 ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
|
11 |
♠J83
♥K52
♦AK3
♣T654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S ♣K 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Johnson-Loops
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠A 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
|
12 |
♠JT542
♥J42
♦QT3
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 2/1♦ 5/4♠ 2NT ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
240 1.00 1.00 1N S +5 ♦4 4-Friedberg-Llacera vs 6-Johnson-Loops
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♥T 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
|
13 |
♠A73
♥A92
♦T2
♣JT972
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ E ♦5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ W +2 ♣J 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ W +2 ♣J 6-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
|
14 |
♠AKJ6
♥AQT63
♦AT85
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦5/6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N ♦6 6-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -2 ♦K 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
150 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -3 ♦6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
15 |
♠AQ
♥AQ7
♦KT95
♣AJT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 1.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♠T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
1470 1.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♥8 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
1440 0.00 2.00 6N S ♥3 6-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
|
16 |
♠AKJ5
♥AT9
♦84
♣AKJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♦A 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♦A 6-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
17 |
♠-
♥T973
♦T753
♣AJ432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ E ♣Q 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♥K 6-Johnson-Loops vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♣Q 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
18 |
♠875
♥AKJ6532
♦8
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ W +2 ♦8 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥A 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦8 6-Johnson-Loops vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
|
19 |
♠T72
♥K
♦AT
♣AQJT865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠4 NT6/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥8 6-Johnson-Loops vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ N ♠9 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ N ♠9 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
20 |
♠AJT85
♥76
♦J6
♣K984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♣5 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
120 1.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♥4 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
100 0.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♥4 6-Johnson-Loops vs 1-Bruno-Hullman
|
21 |
♠J652
♥J84
♦J854
♣73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.50 0.50 1N W +3 ♦5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Johnson-Loops
180 1.50 0.50 1N W +3 ♣7 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣7 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
22 |
♠QT9
♥KQ87
♦QJT82
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥J 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
430 1.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥J 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Johnson-Loops
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 ♠3 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
23 |
♠976
♥85
♦KQ76
♣J964
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Johnson-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥Q 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E ♦4 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
|
24 |
♠AT9873
♥-
♦653
♣J943
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦5 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 7♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 1.00 1.00 6♥ E +1 ♠K 3-Moller-Cramblet vs 4-Friedberg-Llacera
1010 1.00 1.00 6♥ E +1 ♠5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Johnson-Loops
1010 1.00 1.00 6♥ E +1 ♣2 7-Slinger-Sabloff vs 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer
|
25 |
♠AQ3
♥AQ
♦AJ96
♣9764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♣9 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♣9 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 6-Johnson-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♣4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
|
26 |
♠QJ53
♥4
♦AJ54
♣T752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥3 |
EW: 4♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 ♠4 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
200 1.00 1.00 5♠ S -2 ♣Q 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 6-Johnson-Loops
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
|
27 |
♠AJ973
♥AQT3
♦K
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ E ♠K 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ E ♠2 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 6-Johnson-Loops
|
28 |
♠J8762
♥K6
♦J84
♣Q72
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♣T 2-Wesolowski-Oppenheimer vs 6-Johnson-Loops
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣T 1-Bruno-Hullman vs 3-Moller-Cramblet
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣T 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Slinger-Sabloff
|