1 |
♠AKQ4
♥K
♦AKQT6
♣642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣5 3-Wainer-Simon vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠3 2-Karter-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Loops
150 0.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♣5 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Smith-Modest
|
2 |
♠Q762
♥JT85
♦9
♣QJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N E +1 ♣3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Smith-Modest
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♠T 2-Karter-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Loops
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♠8 3-Wainer-Simon vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠KQ
♥A653
♦AQ7
♣KT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♠3 2-Karter-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Loops
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♠6 3-Wainer-Simon vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♠6 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Smith-Modest
|
4 |
♠QJ83
♥AK854
♦J87
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠2 2-Karter-Smith vs 4-Davidson-Loops
170 1.00 1.00 1♥ N +3 ♠2 3-Wainer-Simon vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ S ♦3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 1-Smith-Modest
|
5 |
♠AK6
♥A4
♦64
♣KJT852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♠J 3-Wainer-Simon vs 4-Davidson-Loops
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Modest
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦8 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Karter-Smith
|
6 |
♠AKQ765
♥932
♦T
♣754
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦7/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N ♣8 3-Wainer-Simon vs 4-Davidson-Loops
50 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Modest
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♠A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Karter-Smith
|
7 |
♠J87
♥T95
♦K753
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: ♣5 ♦3/4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 1N W -3 ♦3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Modest
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♥6 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Karter-Smith
90 0.00 2.00 1N N ♥6 3-Wainer-Simon vs 4-Davidson-Loops
|
8 |
♠QJ92
♥862
♦874
♣543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 ♠8 3-Wainer-Simon vs 4-Davidson-Loops
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♥2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Smith-Modest
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♥4 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 2-Karter-Smith
|
9 |
♠Q984
♥AT9
♦32
♣9752
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠4 1-Smith-Modest vs 2-Karter-Smith
100 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠2 4-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♣9 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
10 |
♠A6
♥T98642
♦J4
♣A65
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 6♥ -/1♠ 6NT ♣6 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠T 4-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦T 1-Smith-Modest vs 2-Karter-Smith
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠8 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
11 |
♠9863
♥962
♦J98
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N E +2 ♥3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Wainer-Simon
490 0.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♦J 1-Smith-Modest vs 2-Karter-Smith
490 0.50 1.50 3N E +3 ♥4 4-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
12 |
♠QJ
♥AJT97
♦9762
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♦2 1-Smith-Modest vs 2-Karter-Smith
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ W ♦2 4-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.00 2.00 3N W ♥9 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
13 |
♠AQ942
♥KT87
♦7
♣A85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Karter-Smith
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Smith-Modest vs 3-Wainer-Simon
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦A 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 4-Davidson-Loops
|
14 |
♠AQJ42
♥A43
♦K9
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ -/1♦ 1♥ 1♠ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♦6/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.75 0.25 2N W -1 ♠Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Karter-Smith
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♦7 1-Smith-Modest vs 3-Wainer-Simon
100 0.25 1.75 2♠ N -2 ♥Q 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 4-Davidson-Loops
|
15 |
♠K98
♥762
♦J8742
♣Q9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦4 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 4-Davidson-Loops
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W ♣Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Karter-Smith
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣Q 1-Smith-Modest vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
16 |
♠Q942
♥T97432
♦AJ
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♣3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Karter-Smith
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣3 1-Smith-Modest vs 3-Wainer-Simon
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 4-Davidson-Loops
|
17 |
♠J653
♥Q852
♦64
♣632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦5 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 7♣ 2♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♦ E -3 ♥J 4-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Smith-Modest
460 1.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♥3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
520 0.00 2.00 3N E +4 ♦Q 2-Karter-Smith vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
18 |
♠Q72
♥AT764
♦T3
♣963
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N E ♦6 4-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Smith-Modest
140 1.00 1.00 2N E ♦9 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♥6 2-Karter-Smith vs 3-Wainer-Simon
|
19 |
♠T83
♥K976
♦AJT5
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ -/1♠ ♦5 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♦ N -1 ♦4 2-Karter-Smith vs 3-Wainer-Simon
50 1.50 0.50 3♦ N -1 ♦2 4-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Smith-Modest
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♥3 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠KT
♥KJ983
♦T9864
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠K 2-Karter-Smith vs 3-Wainer-Simon
100 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥4 4-Davidson-Loops vs 1-Smith-Modest
600 0.00 2.00 3N W ♣6 6-Turnquist-Rodrigues vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|