1 |
♠A43
♥J87
♦KQ76
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♥5 2-Stone-Llacera vs 4-Benz-Loops
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ N ♥5 3-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
50 1.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥5 5-Modest-Walker vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠Q 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
2 |
♠QJ9
♥AQ7
♦JT532
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣2 ♥7/6 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1N E -4 ♥5 2-Stone-Llacera vs 4-Benz-Loops
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ E -2 ♣5 3-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
50 1.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♦6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E ♥5 5-Modest-Walker vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
3 |
♠QJ87
♥AKJ75
♦-
♣QT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣9 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♦4 5-Modest-Walker vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
150 0.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♥K 3-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
150 0.50 2.50 3♦ W +2 ♥A 2-Stone-Llacera vs 4-Benz-Loops
|
4 |
♠KQ932
♥J7
♦T42
♣Q64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Stone-Llacera vs 4-Benz-Loops
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦5 5-Modest-Walker vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
100 0.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 ♣A 3-Davidson-Loops vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
|
5 |
♠85
♥A75
♦KQJT97
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣8 3-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣7 4-Benz-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Stone-Llacera
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ N ♥6 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
|
6 |
♠J93
♥A532
♦9754
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦3 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Stone-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S ♦3 3-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♦8 4-Benz-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ W +1 ♥A 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
|
7 |
♠A5
♥K9
♦KQ9765
♣AJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥6/5 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Stone-Llacera
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♠K 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♥8 3-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ N +1 ♠K 4-Benz-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
8 |
♠A3
♥94
♦Q983
♣A9632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N N ♠K 3-Davidson-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
100 2.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥5 4-Benz-Loops vs 1-Black-Sterling
50 1.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♣3 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
100 0.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 ♦7 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Stone-Llacera
|
9 |
♠Q63
♥42
♦QJ2
♣AKQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣7 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Davidson-Loops
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ W ♣A 5-Modest-Walker vs 2-Stone-Llacera
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ W ♣A 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 1-Black-Sterling
200 0.00 3.00 5♠ S -4 ♥A 4-Benz-Loops vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
10 |
♠K
♥K973
♦AQJ6
♣KT76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ 1/2♥ 4/5NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥Q 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Davidson-Loops
660 2.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♠8 4-Benz-Loops vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
630 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥Q 5-Modest-Walker vs 2-Stone-Llacera
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ S ♥6 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
11 |
♠-
♥KJ87
♦AKQJ73
♣J85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 5♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ E ♦5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Davidson-Loops
450 1.50 1.50 5♠ E ♦4 4-Benz-Loops vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♦2 5-Modest-Walker vs 2-Stone-Llacera
500 0.00 3.00 5♦* N -3 ♠A 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
12 |
♠KT64
♥864
♦42
♣T983
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ W ♣T 4-Benz-Loops vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ E ♣A 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 1-Black-Sterling
200 1.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 ♠8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Davidson-Loops
500 0.00 3.00 3♠* N -2 ♥Q 5-Modest-Walker vs 2-Stone-Llacera
|
13 |
♠A7
♥AK75
♦JT98643
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 6♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠J 5-Modest-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠J 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Benz-Loops
200 1.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 ♥A 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Stone-Llacera
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ S ♠J 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 3-Davidson-Loops
|
14 |
♠53
♥82
♦9
♣AKJT6542
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♦ 1♥ 7♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♣ N -2 ♠T 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 3-Davidson-Loops
300 1.50 1.50 5♣* N -2 ♠T 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Stone-Llacera
300 1.50 1.50 5♣* N -2 ♦A 5-Modest-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
1010 0.00 3.00 6♠ W +1 ♥8 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Benz-Loops
|
15 |
♠KJ73
♥QJ
♦T532
♣Q74
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦2 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 3-Davidson-Loops
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦2 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Stone-Llacera
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Benz-Loops
400 0.00 3.00 3N W ♠3 5-Modest-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
|
16 |
♠5
♥T62
♦63
♣AQJ8762
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠6 5-Modest-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
460 2.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♠2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Benz-Loops
430 1.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠6 1-Black-Sterling vs 2-Stone-Llacera
150 0.00 3.00 4♣ N +1 ♣T 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 3-Davidson-Loops
|
17 |
♠-
♥98632
♦K95
♣QT432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N E ♠5 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Black-Sterling
430 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♦3 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Modest-Walker
430 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣3 2-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Davidson-Loops
430 1.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠8 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 4-Benz-Loops
|
18 |
♠T74
♥943
♦AQT9
♣A32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♠2 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 4-Benz-Loops
630 2.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣3 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Black-Sterling
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ S +1 ♦4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Modest-Walker
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♣5 2-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Davidson-Loops
|
19 |
♠7
♥65
♦AQT5
♣A87654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♥ 3/4NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣2 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1700 3.00 0.00 3N* E -6 ♣2 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 4-Benz-Loops
400 2.00 1.00 3N S ♠Q 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Modest-Walker
50 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -1 ♥3 2-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Davidson-Loops
100 0.00 3.00 5♣ S -2 ♥3 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
20 |
♠J7
♥AJ73
♦Q32
♣AT32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 0.50 2N S ♠3 2-Stone-Llacera vs 3-Davidson-Loops
120 2.50 0.50 2N S ♥4 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Modest-Walker
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ N ♥6 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 1-Black-Sterling
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠3 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 4-Benz-Loops
|
21 |
♠AJ7
♥T9
♦Q73
♣JT943
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 ♥2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
200 2.00 1.00 2♥ W +3 ♦3 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 2-Stone-Llacera
200 2.00 1.00 2♥ E +3 ♥7 3-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Benz-Loops
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣J 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Modest-Walker
|
22 |
♠Q9874
♥AT9876
♦-
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Modest-Walker
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥5 3-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Benz-Loops
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦K 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 2-Stone-Llacera
|
23 |
♠AQ92
♥K4
♦J6
♣K9852
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣4/5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♥ E +1 ♠4 3-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Benz-Loops
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ E +2 ♠2 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 2-Stone-Llacera
200 1.00 2.00 2N N -2 ♥3 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠4 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Modest-Walker
|
24 |
♠984
♥KQ
♦QT6
♣J9863
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♥K 1-Black-Sterling vs 5-Modest-Walker
50 2.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥K 3-Davidson-Loops vs 4-Benz-Loops
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥K 7-Wesolowski-Boggs vs 2-Stone-Llacera
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
25 |
♠KQJ8
♥T83
♦A64
♣764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦6 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Davidson-Loops
150 2.00 1.00 2N E +1 ♦2 2-Stone-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
630 0.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠T 4-Benz-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
630 0.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♦2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
|
26 |
♠764
♥J9
♦QT65
♣Q865
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♠ 3NT ♦5/4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 1♠ W -3 ♥J 2-Stone-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♠K 4-Benz-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
600 1.00 2.00 3N W ♦2 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
690 0.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♥J 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Davidson-Loops
|
27 |
♠K8754
♥KJ6
♦JT75
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ ♣3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 2-Stone-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
300 1.50 1.50 6♣* W -2 ♦6 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
300 1.50 1.50 5♣* W -2 ♠5 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Davidson-Loops
510 0.00 3.00 4♣* W ♦J 4-Benz-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
|
28 |
♠A86
♥QT93
♦KT
♣AKT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 4♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 3.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♠3 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Davidson-Loops
1440 2.00 1.00 6N N ♠5 8-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wesolowski-Boggs
690 1.00 2.00 4N N +2 ♠3 4-Benz-Loops vs 5-Modest-Walker
100 0.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♦8 2-Stone-Llacera vs 6-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|