1 |
♠975
♥42
♦QT98
♣J542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ W ♠7 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Franich-Burk
590 0.50 1.50 4♥* W ♠9 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
590 0.50 1.50 4♥* W ♠5 2-Johnson-Loops vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
2 |
♠T32
♥QT6
♦J42
♣A654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W ♣8 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Franich-Burk
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ E ♠5 2-Johnson-Loops vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
450 0.00 2.00 5♥ E ♣9 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
3 |
♠Q9
♥A54
♦AKT6
♣J864
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ W +1 ♦A 2-Johnson-Loops vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ W +2 ♦A 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Franich-Burk
|
4 |
♠T432
♥Q3
♦8753
♣JT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N W ♠T 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
600 1.50 0.50 3N E ♦A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Franich-Burk
660 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠5 2-Johnson-Loops vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
5 |
♠8752
♥AQJT98
♦T
♣J2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 4/5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6/7 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣6/3 ♦7/6 ♥2 ♠6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 1.50 0.50 4♠* W -4 ♥A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Franich-Burk
800 1.50 0.50 4♠* W -4 ♥A 6-Martin-Dau vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
650 0.00 2.00 5♥ N ♦A 2-Johnson-Loops vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
6 |
♠Q72
♥AKQ652
♦QT4
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1/2♦ ♣7/6 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦5 6-Martin-Dau vs 2-Johnson-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♦5 5-Franich-Burk vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N ♦5 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
7 |
♠K84
♥KQT4
♦Q42
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N ♦3 5-Franich-Burk vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ N ♠2 6-Martin-Dau vs 2-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
8 |
♠Q9
♥654
♦8732
♣J632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.00 0.00 1♥ S ♠3 5-Franich-Burk vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Martin-Dau vs 2-Johnson-Loops
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♦2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
9 |
♠KJ82
♥K7
♦J754
♣AT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♦ 3♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ W ♦4 6-Martin-Dau vs 2-Johnson-Loops
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♠2 5-Franich-Burk vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
150 0.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♦3 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
10 |
♠AK
♥KQ873
♦952
♣963
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N ♠Q 5-Franich-Burk vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N ♠Q 6-Martin-Dau vs 2-Johnson-Loops
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♠6 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
11 |
♠93
♥AJ2
♦K63
♣98765
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 6N W -1 ♣9 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.50 0.50 6♠ E -1 ♣Q 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Johnson-Loops
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E ♣Q 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Franich-Burk
|
12 |
♠J82
♥JT94
♦5
♣KJ732
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3/2NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥8 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Johnson-Loops
430 1.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♠8 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠5 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Franich-Burk
|
13 |
♠A98
♥A97
♦QJT
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣A 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Franich-Burk
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣A 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
14 |
♠JT9
♥754
♦Q75
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2/1 NT5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W ♦5 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Franich-Burk
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 1.00 1♥ W +2 ♠J 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
15 |
♠65
♥9753
♦2
♣AKJ873
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣6 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Franich-Burk
180 1.00 1.00 2N S +2 ♣6 6-Martin-Dau vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♦J 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠AQJT82
♥A
♦T652
♣J5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣8 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣2 6-Martin-Dau vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ W +1 ♠A 5-Franich-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
17 |
♠A9
♥QJT82
♦75
♣Q432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4/3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ S -2 ♣A 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ S -2 ♣A 6-Martin-Dau vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♠A 5-Franich-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
18 |
♠J865
♥J754
♦86
♣A54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/-♥ 3♠ 3/2NT ♦6 ♥8/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -4 ♠5 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
150 1.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♥6 5-Franich-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♦8 6-Martin-Dau vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
|
19 |
♠73
♥A8753
♦K9
♣Q652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5/6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ E ♣A 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥9 6-Martin-Dau vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♥9 5-Franich-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
20 |
♠K74
♥KT954
♦53
♣AT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦A 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦A 6-Martin-Dau vs 4-Gamble-Llacera
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♦6 5-Franich-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
21 |
♠T2
♥AJ76
♦QJ8
♣KJ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠Q 2-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠Q 6-Martin-Dau vs 5-Franich-Burk
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
22 |
♠K
♥9
♦A98732
♣Q9854
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♥K 2-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
190 1.00 1.00 2♣ S +5 ♦4 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥6 6-Martin-Dau vs 5-Franich-Burk
|
23 |
♠KQ74
♥T9842
♦QT53
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 5♦ E -5 ♦A 6-Martin-Dau vs 5-Franich-Burk
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ S ♣K 2-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣K 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
24 |
♠J987532
♥K983
♦K
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 5♠ S +1 ♥5 6-Martin-Dau vs 5-Franich-Burk
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦Q 2-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 2.00 6♠ N -2 ♦Q 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
25 |
♠KJ
♥JT6
♦Q972
♣A632
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥5 2-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣8 4-Gamble-Llacera vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣9 6-Martin-Dau vs 5-Franich-Burk
|