1 |
♠842
♥KQ962
♦K
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 5♣ S +1 ♠A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♠A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
100 0.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♠A 5-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠6 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
2 |
♠K7653
♥9876
♦K8
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣T 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♦7 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
200 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣T 5-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
300 0.00 3.00 3N S -3 ♥2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
|
3 |
♠A
♥QJ4
♦KQJ43
♣6432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.00 0.00 4♦* N ♣K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣J 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
400 0.00 3.00 3N N ♣T 5-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
|
4 |
♠6
♥QJ985
♦J752
♣876
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣3/4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -2 ♦A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
100 2.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥Q 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
600 1.00 2.00 3N W ♥8 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
1400 0.00 3.00 3♠* S -5 ♣A 5-Gamble-Loops vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
|
5 |
♠6
♥J96
♦Q5
♣KQJ7654
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♣K 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♣K 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♣K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣K 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
6 |
♠8
♥KT62
♦AKJT975
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3/4♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 5♦* N +1 ♠A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Gamble-Loops
450 1.50 1.50 5♥ S ♣A 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦A 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
|
7 |
♠94
♥KT85
♦9862
♣652
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.00 0.00 1♠ S ♥J 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ W ♠9 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♥J 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♠5 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
8 |
♠KJ3
♥J8
♦AKJ942
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4/5 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 4♦ N ♥A 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Smith-Slinger
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -2 ♥Q 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♣A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
9 |
♠4
♥KT92
♦9874
♣K654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +2 ♠J 4-Franich-Burk vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +2 ♠J 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +2 ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
1430 0.00 3.00 6♠ E ♥5 5-Gamble-Loops vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
10 |
♠J972
♥742
♦JT54
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 1♣ S +3 ♥3 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
80 2.00 1.00 1♥ W ♠9 4-Franich-Burk vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
90 1.00 2.00 1N E ♣5 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -2 ♥5 5-Gamble-Loops vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
11 |
♠AKT7
♥JT863
♦J2
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♠9 4-Franich-Burk vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♥A 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +2 ♦A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +2 ♣J 5-Gamble-Loops vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
12 |
♠T8
♥KT843
♦Q65
♣K74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♥5 5-Gamble-Loops vs 2-Smith-Slinger
420 1.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♥4 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
420 1.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♥4 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
420 1.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♥3 4-Franich-Burk vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
|
13 |
♠87
♥AKQ92
♦A6
♣AJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 5-Gamble-Loops vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Franich-Burk
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ N +2 ♦K 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
14 |
♠-
♥A9743
♦J754
♣AJ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♥ ♣3 ♥7/6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 4NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣8 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥2 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Franich-Burk
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥5 5-Gamble-Loops vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♣2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
15 |
♠T65
♥J8765
♦532
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4/3♦ 1/-♠ 2/1NT ♥6 ♠7/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♥2 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠K 5-Gamble-Loops vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Franich-Burk
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♥2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
16 |
♠6
♥AT9653
♦AKT2
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 5-Gamble-Loops vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
100 2.00 1.00 5♣* S -1 ♠A 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 2-Smith-Slinger
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣A 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W ♣A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
17 |
♠A8652
♥A7
♦J76
♣QT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♣ S +2 ♦Q 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
100 2.00 1.00 5♥* W -1 ♠A 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♣5 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
18 |
♠JT8
♥AKQ74
♦K84
♣93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4/5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠4 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠3 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠2 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Gamble-Loops
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦6 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
19 |
♠A84
♥852
♦KT6
♣KQ62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣9 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣4 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Gamble-Loops
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠2 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♣8 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
20 |
♠JT97
♥A43
♦K94
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 2/4♥ 3/4♠ 1/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦A 6-Benz-Oppenheimer vs 1-Wasserstrom-Ray
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ S +3 ♥9 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 4-Franich-Burk
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ N +3 ♣5 2-Smith-Slinger vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♥K 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
21 |
♠JT7654
♥QT953
♦-
♣84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 ♥5 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 2-Smith-Slinger
50 1.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♥5 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
50 1.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♥3 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Gamble-Loops
50 1.00 2.00 4♣ W -1 ♥9 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
22 |
♠K742
♥K74
♦54
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Gamble-Loops
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♣4 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Franich-Burk
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♣4 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 2-Smith-Slinger
430 0.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♣4 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
|
23 |
♠AK3
♥J95
♦53
♣QJ832
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦5 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ W ♠A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Franich-Burk
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦5 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 2-Smith-Slinger
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
24 |
♠A952
♥KQ9
♦J95
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦A 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 5-Gamble-Loops
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Franich-Burk
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♦A 7-Tainty-Slinger vs 2-Smith-Slinger
|
25 |
♠5
♥AJ65
♦J943
♣J872
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
440 3.00 0.00 5♣ N +2 ♥T 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.50 1.50 1♠ S +3 ♣6 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
170 1.50 1.50 4♣ S +2 ♥7 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ W -1 ♠5 4-Franich-Burk vs 5-Gamble-Loops
|
26 |
♠A98
♥Q7
♦Q73
♣AK973
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3/4♠ 2/3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣J 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
600 2.00 1.00 3N N ♣6 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
210 1.00 2.00 2N N +3 ♥2 4-Franich-Burk vs 5-Gamble-Loops
150 0.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 ♥2 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
27 |
♠T8653
♥43
♦J6
♣AJ86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E +2 ♦7 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ E ♦9 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣T 4-Franich-Burk vs 5-Gamble-Loops
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦9 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
28 |
♠AJ85
♥95
♦T42
♣J962
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2/3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥2 4-Franich-Burk vs 5-Gamble-Loops
90 2.00 1.00 1N E ♣6 1-Wasserstrom-Ray vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
150 0.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♠5 8-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 7-Tainty-Slinger
150 0.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♥9 2-Smith-Slinger vs 6-Benz-Oppenheimer
|