1 |
♠J64
♥T7
♦943
♣KQ964
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣6/5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠7/6 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 3♥ E +3 ♣8 3-Downing-Kremers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠4 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 2-Burk-Beiers
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♣4 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 7-Keen-Reuben
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E ♥6 5-Burke-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E ♦A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
2 |
♠AK64
♥7
♦KQ975
♣632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥A 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 2-Burk-Beiers
500 2.50 1.50 3♥* E -3 ♣K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
500 2.50 1.50 2♥* E -3 ♣A 5-Burke-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
180 1.00 3.00 2N N +2 ♥A 3-Downing-Kremers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 7-Keen-Reuben
|
3 |
♠A876
♥Q6
♦JT32
♣AQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦J 3-Downing-Kremers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
100 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♦J 5-Burke-Loops vs 6-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♣9 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
90 1.00 3.00 1N N ♦4 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 2-Burk-Beiers
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W ♦2 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 7-Keen-Reuben
|
4 |
♠Q762
♥QJ843
♦74
♣Q6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠1/2 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4N W -2 ♥4 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 3-Downing-Kremers
620 3.00 1.00 5♣ W +1 ♥4 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-Reuben
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♦7 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Burk-Beiers
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♥3 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 4-Black-Sterling
|
5 |
♠T94
♥J8
♦AKJT9
♣K92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 7♠ 6/7NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦2/1 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 4.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 ♥T 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
1430 3.00 1.00 6♠ S ♣3 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Burk-Beiers
690 2.00 2.00 3N N +3 ♣Q 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-Reuben
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ S +3 ♦4 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 4-Black-Sterling
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 ♣6 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 3-Downing-Kremers
|
6 |
♠AKT943
♥96
♦AKQ2
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♥J 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♦6 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Burk-Beiers
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♥J 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Keen-Reuben
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♣K 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 3-Downing-Kremers
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♣K 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 4-Black-Sterling
|
7 |
♠AQT854
♥J98
♦872
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣Q 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Downing-Kremers
90 3.00 1.00 1N E ♥3 2-Burk-Beiers vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 4-Black-Sterling
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W ♥8 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 5-Burke-Loops
200 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -1 ♦Q 7-Keen-Reuben vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
|
8 |
♠J3
♥A876
♦AQ6
♣K432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 4.00 0.00 1♣ N +6 ♠K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Downing-Kremers
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♠J 2-Burk-Beiers vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♣6 7-Keen-Reuben vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♠4 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 5-Burke-Loops
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♣5 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 4-Black-Sterling
|
9 |
♠AKT2
♥AJ8
♦J874
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♣2 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 4-Black-Sterling
400 3.50 0.50 5♦ N ♣A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Downing-Kremers
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♦6 7-Keen-Reuben vs 1-Johnson-Wesolowski
150 1.00 3.00 2♦ N +3 ♣A 2-Burk-Beiers vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♥Q 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 5-Burke-Loops
|
10 |
♠954
♥KQ85
♦A98
♣A92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠4 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Burk-Beiers
150 3.00 1.00 2N W +1 ♥5 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 6-Harken-Harken
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥K 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 5-Burke-Loops
180 1.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♥5 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 3-Downing-Kremers
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥5 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Black-Sterling
|
11 |
♠J874
♥A93
♦Q95
♣K73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦T 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 5-Burke-Loops
50 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♣2 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Burk-Beiers
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♠2 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 6-Harken-Harken
460 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♣3 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Black-Sterling
800 0.00 4.00 5♦** E ♠9 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 3-Downing-Kremers
|
12 |
♠974
♥QT
♦KT4
♣AT984
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♥4 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 2-Burk-Beiers
150 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -3 ♥Q 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Black-Sterling
150 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -3 ♣7 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss vs 5-Burke-Loops
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ S +2 ♦9 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 3-Downing-Kremers
90 0.00 4.00 1N E ♥J 10-Cirillo-Thomas vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
13 |
♠43
♥T
♦A8643
♣K8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ N ♥K 7-Keen-Reuben vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
80 3.00 1.00 1♠ E ♦K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Burke-Loops
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E ♦K 6-Harken-Harken vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠4 4-Black-Sterling vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
150 0.00 4.00 1N W +2 ♦4 2-Burk-Beiers vs 3-Downing-Kremers
|
14 |
♠J9865
♥K53
♦KJ
♣A74
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♣ W ♠6 7-Keen-Reuben vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ W +1 ♠9 4-Black-Sterling vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ W +1 ♠6 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Burke-Loops
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ W +1 ♠5 2-Burk-Beiers vs 3-Downing-Kremers
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♥3 6-Harken-Harken vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
|
15 |
♠Q2
♥KQ965
♦A852
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 7♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♥ N ♦3 6-Harken-Harken vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
680 2.50 1.50 5♥ N +1 ♣5 7-Keen-Reuben vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
680 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♥2 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Burke-Loops
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♣4 4-Black-Sterling vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♦J 2-Burk-Beiers vs 3-Downing-Kremers
|
16 |
♠KJ652
♥T7
♦AK3
♣J82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ N +1 ♦2 5-Burke-Loops vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ N ♥K 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
50 1.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 ♥8 3-Downing-Kremers vs 4-Black-Sterling
50 1.50 2.50 2♦ N -1 ♥K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠3 7-Keen-Reuben vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
|
17 |
♠KT75
♥K7
♦742
♣A932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ ♥5/4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♥5 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 7-Keen-Reuben vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
50 3.00 1.00 4♣ S -1 ♥A 3-Downing-Kremers vs 4-Black-Sterling
150 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♥4 5-Burke-Loops vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
200 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -4 ♥A 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
18 |
♠Q3
♥AQT
♦AJ2
♣KQJ97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♥ 1/-♠ 6NT ♦6 ♠7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 4.00 0.00 6♥ S +1 ♠T 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
1430 3.00 1.00 6♥ S ♠J 3-Downing-Kremers vs 4-Black-Sterling
1390 2.00 2.00 6♣ S +1 ♠J 5-Burke-Loops vs 9-Girouard-Cohen
710 1.00 3.00 5♥ S +2 ♠J 7-Keen-Reuben vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ S +2 ♥8 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠965
♥A82
♦T732
♣K73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ S ♣Q 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 6-Harken-Harken
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣8 2-Burk-Beiers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S ♣Q 4-Black-Sterling vs 5-Burke-Loops
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S ♣8 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Keen-Reuben
100 0.00 4.00 1N W -1 ♠5 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
|
20 |
♠J985
♥72
♦KQ4
♣KT82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 6-Harken-Harken
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 ♥A 2-Burk-Beiers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +3 ♥A 4-Black-Sterling vs 5-Burke-Loops
200 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -2 ♠K 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Keen-Reuben
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +2 ♥A 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
|
21 |
♠Q86
♥AK
♦8543
♣A982
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♠J 2-Burk-Beiers vs 10-Cirillo-Thomas
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ N ♦A 9-Girouard-Cohen vs 6-Harken-Harken
90 1.50 2.50 1N N ♠4 12-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Keen-Reuben
90 1.50 2.50 2♣ N ♦A 4-Black-Sterling vs 5-Burke-Loops
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 ♦3 1-Johnson-Wesolowski vs 11-Wasserstrom-Reiss
|