1 |
♠AJ532
♥T
♦86
♣KT986
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠9 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Cowen-Brown
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦8 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 1-Burke-Loops
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♦8 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 3.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♦8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
400 2.00 4.00 3N E ♦5 5-Browning-Nelson vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
420 0.50 5.50 4♥ W ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.50 5.50 4♥ W ♥T 6-Harken-Beiers vs 3-Modest-Gunter
|
2 |
♠QT9
♥3
♦KQ7654
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1/2NT ♣4 ♥3/4 ♠3/4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 4.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♠A 6-Harken-Beiers vs 3-Modest-Gunter
100 4.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♠K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E ♥6 5-Browning-Nelson vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
170 0.50 5.50 2♠ E +2 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.50 5.50 2♠ E +2 ♣J 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 1-Burke-Loops
|
3 |
♠K43
♥J8
♦J97
♣98652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 6.00 0.00 1♥ S ♦K 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 1-Burke-Loops
140 5.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♥J 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♣5 6-Harken-Beiers vs 3-Modest-Gunter
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♦8 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Cowen-Brown
620 0.50 5.50 4♠ W ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.50 5.50 4♠ W ♣9 5-Browning-Nelson vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
4 |
♠T54
♥K
♦J86543
♣Q87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♦5 7-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Cowen-Brown
200 5.50 0.50 4♦ W -2 ♠5 5-Browning-Nelson vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 6-Harken-Beiers vs 1-Burke-Loops
120 2.00 4.00 2N W ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 1.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♦Q 2-Dean-Flint vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
620 0.00 6.00 4♥ E ♦Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠K2
♥AQ6
♦KJ965
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2/3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠6 6-Harken-Beiers vs 1-Burke-Loops
100 3.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♥3 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♠A 7-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♣8 2-Dean-Flint vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 ♣8 5-Browning-Nelson vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 ♣8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠KJT8
♥7432
♦8754
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1NT ♣5/4 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
200 5.50 0.50 2♦ W -2 ♣T 2-Dean-Flint vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
100 4.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♣T 5-Browning-Nelson vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
90 3.00 3.00 2♦ W ♣T 6-Harken-Beiers vs 1-Burke-Loops
120 1.50 4.50 2N E ♣Q 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
120 1.50 4.50 2N E ♣8 7-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Cowen-Brown
130 0.00 6.00 3♦ W +1 ♣T 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠AJT85
♥94
♦KQ653
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦4 2-Dean-Flint vs 1-Burke-Loops
660 5.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
630 4.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥2 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Modest-Gunter
620 2.50 3.50 4♠ S ♦4 5-Browning-Nelson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.50 3.50 4♠ S ♦4 6-Harken-Beiers vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
150 1.00 5.00 2N S +1 ♦4 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -1 ♦4 7-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
8 |
♠A84
♥875
♦KQJ2
♣K76
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦K 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦K 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Modest-Gunter
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦K 5-Browning-Nelson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
50 4.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
400 1.00 5.00 3N W ♦2 2-Dean-Flint vs 1-Burke-Loops
420 0.00 6.00 4♠ W ♦K 6-Harken-Beiers vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
9 |
♠AJ8
♥T8
♦A986
♣KQ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♥ 4♠ ♣1/0 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 3N N ♥5 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
150 2.50 3.50 4♦ N +1 ♦3 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 2.50 3.50 3♦ S +2 ♠6 2-Dean-Flint vs 1-Burke-Loops
150 2.50 3.50 3♦ N +2 ♠K 5-Browning-Nelson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.50 3.50 3♦ N +2 ♠2 6-Harken-Beiers vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
150 2.50 3.50 2♦ S +3 ♥A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Modest-Gunter
150 2.50 3.50 2♦ N +3 ♦7 7-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
10 |
♠KQ987
♥952
♦T8
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♣K 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 2-Dean-Flint vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ N ♦6 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
90 3.00 3.00 1N S ♦K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Burke-Loops
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥Q 6-Harken-Beiers vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
200 0.50 5.50 3N S -2 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Brown
200 0.50 5.50 3♣ S -2 ♦A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Gunter
|
11 |
♠Q5
♥AJ73
♦64
♣A7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.50 0.50 4♣ S ♦Q 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
130 5.50 0.50 3♣ S +1 ♠7 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Gunter
50 3.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 7-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Burke-Loops
50 3.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Brown
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ E ♥6 6-Harken-Beiers vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ E ♦A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♥6 2-Dean-Flint vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠9632
♥74
♦QT73
♣JT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1/2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♥6 6-Harken-Beiers vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
130 5.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♣4 2-Dean-Flint vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
100 2.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 2.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥6 7-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Burke-Loops
100 2.00 4.00 5♦ N -1 ♠8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Modest-Gunter
130 0.00 6.00 4♣ E ♦A 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠AKJ75
♥T9
♦KQJ9
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♥K 5-Browning-Nelson vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
150 3.50 2.50 4♣ W +1 ♦K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
150 3.50 2.50 4♣ E +1 ♠9 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Burke-Loops
150 3.50 2.50 4♣ E +1 ♠6 2-Dean-Flint vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 3.50 2.50 3♣ W +2 ♠A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
300 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -3 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Modest-Gunter
750 0.00 6.00 5♣* E ♠3 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 4-Cowen-Brown
|
14 |
♠Q873
♥AKQJT98
♦T
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♦ 6♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.50 0.50 5♥* N -2 ♣7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Burke-Loops
300 5.50 0.50 5♥* N -2 ♣7 5-Browning-Nelson vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥5 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
450 2.50 3.50 5♠ W ♥A 7-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Modest-Gunter
500 1.00 5.00 5♥* N -3 ♣7 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 4-Cowen-Brown
690 0.00 6.00 4♠* W +1 ♥A 2-Dean-Flint vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
15 |
♠AT7
♥AQ97
♦2
♣J7532
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1/2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3♦ W +2 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Modest-Gunter
400 4.50 1.50 5♦ W ♠A 2-Dean-Flint vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
400 4.50 1.50 5♦ W ♣7 5-Browning-Nelson vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
430 2.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♣2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
430 2.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♣4 7-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
460 1.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♥7 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 4-Cowen-Brown
920 0.00 6.00 6♦ W ♥A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Burke-Loops
|
16 |
♠93
♥9652
♦Q84
♣A654
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3/2 ♥2 ♠1/2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣3 6-Harken-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 5.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
600 3.50 2.50 3N W ♥2 2-Dean-Flint vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
600 3.50 2.50 3N E ♣3 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
620 2.00 4.00 4♠ W ♣4 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 3-Modest-Gunter
650 1.00 5.00 4♠ W +1 ♦4 5-Browning-Nelson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
660 0.00 6.00 3N E +2 ♣8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Burke-Loops
|
17 |
♠T97
♥T763
♦9432
♣K4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥4/3 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5/4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 6♦ W -1 ♠7 6-Harken-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
150 4.50 1.50 3♦ W +2 ♠7 5-Browning-Nelson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
150 4.50 1.50 3♦ W +2 ♥3 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 3-Modest-Gunter
400 3.00 3.00 5♦ W ♠T 2-Dean-Flint vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
430 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
430 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♠3 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Burke-Loops
430 1.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♥2 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
18 |
♠QT84
♥AT763
♦86
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
200 4.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
200 4.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♣8 6-Harken-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +3 ♣8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Burke-Loops
170 1.50 4.50 3♥ N +1 ♦4 2-Dean-Flint vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
170 1.50 4.50 3♥ N +1 ♣8 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 3-Modest-Gunter
100 0.00 6.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 5-Browning-Nelson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
|
19 |
♠Q842
♥A943
♦K3
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6/5 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6/7 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦K 6-Harken-Beiers vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
130 5.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣9 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 3.00 2N W -1 ♠2 2-Dean-Flint vs 4-Cowen-Brown
PASS 2.00 4.00 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Burke-Loops
100 1.00 5.00 2♠ N -2 ♥K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
120 0.00 6.00 2N E ♦T 5-Browning-Nelson vs 3-Modest-Gunter
|
20 |
♠KJ5
♥842
♦92
♣JT875
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.00 0.00 4♦ S ♦T 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
100 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦A 5-Browning-Nelson vs 3-Modest-Gunter
100 4.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Burke-Loops
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ E ♦A 6-Harken-Beiers vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
140 1.50 4.50 3♥ E ♦A 2-Dean-Flint vs 4-Cowen-Brown
140 1.50 4.50 3♥ E ♦A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
500 0.00 6.00 5♦* S -2 ♥Q 7-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
21 |
♠Q94
♥A
♦8532
♣KQ975
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ E ♣4 7-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
430 5.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣4 5-Browning-Nelson vs 3-Modest-Gunter
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Burke-Loops
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣J 2-Dean-Flint vs 4-Cowen-Brown
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣J 6-Harken-Beiers vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
450 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣4 1-Jacobs-Moesinger vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
22 |
♠J86
♥Q42
♦652
♣J842
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.50 0.50 3♣ E +2 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 5.50 0.50 2♣ E +3 ♥A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
180 4.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♣2 2-Dean-Flint vs 3-Modest-Gunter
630 2.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠6 5-Browning-Nelson vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
630 2.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦2 6-Harken-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Brown
630 2.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
690 0.00 6.00 3N W +3 ♣2 7-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠KJ6432
♥AT2
♦4
♣QT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥7 6-Harken-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Brown
140 5.00 1.00 3♠ N ♦7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
100 4.00 2.00 5♥ W -1 ♦4 7-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 2.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♥8 5-Browning-Nelson vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
200 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 ♥5 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
400 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -4 ♣A 2-Dean-Flint vs 3-Modest-Gunter
|
24 |
♠K9
♥T5
♦J5
♣KQJ9875
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦A 2-Dean-Flint vs 3-Modest-Gunter
130 4.50 1.50 3♣ N +1 ♠6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
130 4.50 1.50 3♣ N +1 ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Wesolowski-Osborn
110 3.00 3.00 3♣ N ♦A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Wilson-Wilson
50 2.00 4.00 5♦ E -1 ♣A 5-Browning-Nelson vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
130 1.00 5.00 4♦ E ♣A 6-Harken-Beiers vs 4-Cowen-Brown
300 0.00 6.00 5♣* N -2 ♠6 7-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|