1 |
♠KQ4
♥AT943
♦92
♣T85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♠* W -2 ♦9 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♠A 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♦3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
50 0.00 3.00 5♦ S -1 ♠A 7-Smith-Smith vs 3-Schilling-Benich
|
2 |
♠KJ3
♥J85
♦QT983
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥0 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 7♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ E ♦4 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ E ♣5 7-Smith-Smith vs 3-Schilling-Benich
1010 1.00 2.00 6♥ E +1 ♥3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
1510 0.00 3.00 7♥ E ♥6 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
|
3 |
♠32
♥KJ98
♦AJ4
♣AKQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♠ W ♣A 7-Smith-Smith vs 3-Schilling-Benich
790 1.50 1.50 4♠* W ♣A 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
1070 0.17 2.83 2♠* W +2 ♣A 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
|
4 |
♠A
♥765
♦JT932
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 1N W -1 ♦J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
100 2.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♦6 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Schilling-Benich
90 0.50 2.50 1N W ♦J 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
90 0.50 2.50 1N W ♦J 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
5 |
♠J973
♥AJ4
♦653
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 3.00 0.00 3♠* S ♦K 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦K 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣J 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Schilling-Benich
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♠K 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
6 |
♠KT
♥KT53
♦J98
♣Q763
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♠3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♠2 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 3-Schilling-Benich
650 2.00 1.00 4♠ E +1 ♥4 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
680 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♠2 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
7 |
♠Q32
♥98762
♦K75
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 ♥9 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 7-Smith-Smith
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♣6 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
1430 0.50 2.50 6♠ W ♥9 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
1430 0.50 2.50 6♠ W ♣6 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
|
8 |
♠KT94
♥KJ3
♦96
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♦2 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
150 2.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♠5 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 7-Smith-Smith
50 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
|
9 |
♠K73
♥-
♦A98742
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠2/3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♦* N -1 ♥A 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ W +2 ♦A 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
300 1.00 2.00 5♦* N -2 ♥A 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 7-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦A 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
|
10 |
♠A95
♥Q42
♦QT83
♣A92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N E +1 ♠8 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠5 3-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠5 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠8 7-Smith-Smith vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
11 |
♠AQT7
♥J64
♦K8
♣8653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 4/3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦5 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦2 3-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♣2 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦2 7-Smith-Smith vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
12 |
♠63
♥6
♦JT983
♣KQ942
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣K 3-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
120 2.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♦J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦J 9-Hubbell-Ray vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
1400 0.00 3.00 2♠* N -5 ♠9 7-Smith-Smith vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
13 |
♠Q7
♥Q93
♦A9762
♣A97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1N N -1 ♠3 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♦J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Schilling-Benich
200 0.50 2.50 1N N -2 ♠A 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Smith-Smith
200 0.50 2.50 1N N -2 ♥7 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
|
14 |
♠Q8754
♥JT97
♦976
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2/1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +4 ♠J 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Smith-Smith
90 2.00 1.00 1♣ S +1 ♣J 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦3 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
250 0.00 3.00 2N S -5 ♦4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Schilling-Benich
|
15 |
♠KQ93
♥KT754
♦86
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣8 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Smith-Smith
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣4 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣2 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♣6 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Schilling-Benich
|
16 |
♠T
♥J
♦K643
♣AJ86543
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♠ E -3 ♣7 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
150 2.00 1.00 4♣ N +1 ♣T 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
100 1.00 2.00 5♣* N -1 ♣T 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Smith-Smith
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣A 3-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
|
17 |
♠8532
♥QT742
♦43
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N W +3 ♥4 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Smith-Smith
920 1.00 2.00 6♣ E ♥6 3-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
920 1.00 2.00 6♣ E ♦J 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
920 1.00 2.00 6♣ E ♣9 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
18 |
♠654
♥T2
♦98632
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4/3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +2 ♠5 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +2 ♦3 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Smith-Smith
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +2 ♣K 3-Schilling-Benich vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
980 0.00 3.00 6♥ W ♣K 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|
19 |
♠AQT5
♥AJ4
♦QT53
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥8 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
490 2.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥7 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
460 0.50 2.50 3N N +2 ♥7 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Smith-Smith
460 0.50 2.50 3N N +2 ♥2 3-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
|
20 |
♠Q73
♥AK8
♦3
♣J97542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣0 ♥6 ♠1/0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +3 ♣T 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦K 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Smith-Smith
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣T 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 ♣T 3-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
|
21 |
♠A8
♥J8642
♦K974
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♠A 3-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Andrews-Andrews
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♠A 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
100 2.00 1.00 5♣* E -1 ♠K 1-Friedberg-Llacera vs 7-Smith-Smith
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ W ♠A 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Slinger-Slinger
|
22 |
♠QJ42
♥T
♦AT4
♣KQ952
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♠T 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 3-Schilling-Benich
50 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♥3 7-Smith-Smith vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♥2 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
|
23 |
♠AQ6
♥62
♦A8762
♣Q93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N N ♣4 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 3-Schilling-Benich
100 1.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♠4 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♥T 7-Smith-Smith vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♣J 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
|
24 |
♠832
♥KJ74
♦KQ43
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥4/5 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♦ N +2 ♣T 2-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Nathanson-Forest
50 2.00 1.00 4♦ N -1 ♦J 7-Smith-Smith vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠5 4-Faircrest-Gamble vs 3-Schilling-Benich
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠5 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
|
25 |
♠AKQ54
♥A532
♦AK86
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4/3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♠3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Smith-Smith
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣2 3-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣2 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
|
26 |
♠AK9
♥AK65
♦JT82
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠2 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
630 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣T 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Smith-Smith
600 0.00 3.00 3N N ♦3 3-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
|
27 |
♠A6
♥AJ65
♦KQ94
♣KT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♠K 3-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Hubbell-Ray
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♠K 8-Nathanson-Forest vs 1-Friedberg-Llacera
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♠3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Smith-Smith
480 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♦3 5-Slinger-Slinger vs 4-Faircrest-Gamble
|