1 |
♠J632
♥95
♦QJ953
♣J7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N E ♥2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♣2 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♣2 7-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♣2 9-Browning-Girouard vs 2-Claussen-Gift
|
2 |
♠KT43
♥654
♦Q9
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦A 7-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♦3 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ N +2 ♦A 9-Browning-Girouard vs 2-Claussen-Gift
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
3 |
♠KT83
♥KJT532
♦6
♣J2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1/0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 4♦ 1♥ 6♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.67 0.33 4♠ E +1 ♦4 9-Browning-Girouard vs 2-Claussen-Gift
680 1.17 2.83 4♠ W +2 ♦6 7-Zinman-Chase vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
680 1.17 2.83 4♠ E +2 ♦5 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
4 |
♠AQ9
♥92
♦A753
♣KJ97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.63 1.38 3N N ♣3 7-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
600 2.63 1.38 3N N ♣3 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Karter
600 2.63 1.38 3N N ♣2 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Claussen-Gift
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♠8 1-Albright-Gunter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠Q4
♥JT9
♦KJ94
♣K842
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 1N N +2 ♥3 1-Albright-Gunter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣3 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Karter
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♣3 7-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♥3 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Claussen-Gift
|
6 |
♠K964
♥84
♦KQ
♣KT975
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ N +1 ♥J 7-Zinman-Chase vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ E ♣Q 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Claussen-Gift
170 1.38 2.63 2♥ E +2 ♦5 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Karter
200 0.13 3.88 1♥ E +4 ♦7 1-Albright-Gunter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
7 |
♠K
♥AK86
♦JT874
♣J53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♥ E -1 ♠8 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ W ♥A 9-Browning-Girouard vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ W +1 ♠K 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Albright-Gunter
200 0.13 3.88 3♦ N -2 ♣A 2-Claussen-Gift vs 4-Smith-Karter
|
8 |
♠KQ86
♥KQ95
♦983
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ S ♦A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Albright-Gunter
50 2.63 1.38 3♥ N -1 ♦T 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
90 0.75 3.25 1N W ♥5 2-Claussen-Gift vs 4-Smith-Karter
90 0.75 3.25 1♦ W +1 ♠K 9-Browning-Girouard vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
9 |
♠KT6
♥A98
♦JT9764
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.67 0.33 3♣ E -3 ♠A 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 2.00 2.00 1♥ N +2 ♠4 9-Browning-Girouard vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
130 0.33 3.67 3♦ N +1 ♠8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Albright-Gunter
|
10 |
♠8432
♥AKQ95
♦A7
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +1 ♦4 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Claussen-Gift
650 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +1 ♦J 7-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Smith-Karter
630 1.38 2.63 3N S +1 ♦4 9-Browning-Girouard vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ N ♠T 1-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
11 |
♠T7
♥J96
♦J542
♣QT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 3.88 0.13 4♥* S ♠Q 7-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Smith-Karter
170 2.63 1.38 3♥ S +1 ♠Q 9-Browning-Girouard vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ S ♦Q 1-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
100 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -2 ♦Q 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Claussen-Gift
|
12 |
♠763
♥754
♦AK85
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4/3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.25 0.75 3N S +1 ♥3 1-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
630 3.25 0.75 3N S +1 ♥3 7-Zinman-Chase vs 4-Smith-Karter
600 0.75 3.25 3N S ♥3 9-Browning-Girouard vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
600 0.75 3.25 3N S ♥3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Claussen-Gift
|
13 |
♠AQ3
♥A873
♦AK6
♣K76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1NT ♦7/6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♥5 1-Albright-Gunter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
100 3.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♣5 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♣5 4-Smith-Karter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
200 1.50 2.50 2N N -2 ♦J 2-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Chase
300 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♣5 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
14 |
♠T62
♥Q
♦QT753
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -3 ♦8 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣A 4-Smith-Karter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♣7 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦8 2-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Chase
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♣5 1-Albright-Gunter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
|
15 |
♠A7
♥J52
♦AKQ74
♣J98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ -/1NT ♣3/6 ♠4 NT4/7 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♦A 2-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Chase
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦A 4-Smith-Karter vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ W ♦A 1-Albright-Gunter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W ♦A 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
16 |
♠J76
♥Q7642
♦Q6543
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣0 ♥3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♥ 6/5NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠6 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Smith-Karter
190 3.00 1.00 3♣ W +4 ♦Q 2-Claussen-Gift vs 1-Albright-Gunter
620 2.00 2.00 5♣ W +1 ♦4 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
950 1.00 3.00 5♣* W +1 ♦3 9-Browning-Girouard vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
1370 0.00 4.00 6♣ W ♦3 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Zinman-Chase
|
17 |
♠62
♥AKQ5
♦T876
♣J52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦A 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Zinman-Chase
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠6 2-Claussen-Gift vs 1-Albright-Gunter
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠2 9-Browning-Girouard vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
150 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♦5 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Smith-Karter
|
18 |
♠532
♥KJT842
♦K
♣T98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +3 ♣Q 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Zinman-Chase
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♦6 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Smith-Karter
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♣2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♠9 2-Claussen-Gift vs 1-Albright-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 1♠ S -2 ♦Q 9-Browning-Girouard vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
19 |
♠K7
♥9876
♦T74
♣6432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣6 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♣2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Claussen-Gift
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♣2 1-Albright-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Chase
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♣6 4-Smith-Karter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♣6 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
20 |
♠9
♥A954
♦J542
♣AT98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1/2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♣5 4-Smith-Karter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ S ♣5 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ S +1 ♣5 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♦J 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Claussen-Gift
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♦A 1-Albright-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Chase
|
21 |
♠K9
♥K86543
♦K86
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3/5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♦5 4-Smith-Karter vs 9-Browning-Girouard
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♣9 6-Nathanson-Forest vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -2 ♦8 1-Albright-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Chase
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ W -2 ♥3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♥5 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Claussen-Gift
|
22 |
♠AJ7
♥86
♦T764
♣AQ95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♠9 7-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Browning-Girouard
150 3.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♣4 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Albright-Gunter
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♣T 2-Claussen-Gift vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♣T 4-Smith-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 4.00 1N E -1 ♥4 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
|
23 |
♠JT
♥K986532
♦543
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥6 ♠4/3 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 1♥ 3♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥4 4-Smith-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥6 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♥J 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Albright-Gunter
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 7-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Browning-Girouard
300 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♦A 2-Claussen-Gift vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
24 |
♠QT632
♥K3
♦T83
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT3/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠3 2-Claussen-Gift vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
50 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♠3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nathanson-Forest
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦8 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Albright-Gunter
400 0.50 3.50 3N W ♠3 4-Smith-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
400 0.50 3.50 3N W ♣2 7-Zinman-Chase vs 9-Browning-Girouard
|
25 |
♠932
♥AJ9
♦976
♣JT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 1♦ E +3 ♦3 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Browning-Girouard
650 2.63 1.38 4♠ E +1 ♣7 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Zinman-Chase
660 0.75 3.25 3N E +2 ♣4 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Smith-Karter
660 0.75 3.25 3N E +2 ♣4 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Albright-Gunter
|
26 |
♠732
♥AQT94
♦A4
♣QT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♥ S +2 ♦9 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Smith-Karter
650 1.38 2.63 4♥ S +1 ♠T 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Browning-Girouard
650 1.38 2.63 4♥ S +1 ♠T 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Zinman-Chase
650 1.38 2.63 4♥ S +1 ♦2 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Albright-Gunter
|
27 |
♠AQ52
♥82
♦98
♣A9872
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7/6♣ 5/4♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣0 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
440 3.25 0.75 5♣ S +2 ♦K 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Smith-Karter
440 3.25 0.75 5♣ N +2 ♠J 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Zinman-Chase
420 0.75 3.25 5♣ S +1 ♦K 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Browning-Girouard
420 0.75 3.25 5♣ N +1 ♠J 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Albright-Gunter
|