1 |
♠QT
♥A
♦KQ87642
♣K76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 4♦ N ♣A 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N ♣8 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Gift-Claussen
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣T 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Gunter-Albright
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ E ♦3 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
2 |
♠982
♥93
♦765
♣KJ982
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♦J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♦J 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Gunter-Albright
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♣T 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Gift-Claussen
980 0.00 3.00 6♠ E ♥A 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
3 |
♠KQ
♥AK63
♦7632
♣JT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥4 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Gunter-Albright
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♥4 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣7 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
150 0.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♣6 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Gift-Claussen
|
4 |
♠K73
♥A743
♦J8
♣A954
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ S ♣Q 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Gunter-Albright
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♦K 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠3 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Gift-Claussen
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E ♥9 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
5 |
♠54
♥J97
♦AKQJ86
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♥K 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Gift-Claussen
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♦A 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
140 0.50 2.50 1♠ W +2 ♦A 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠52
♥T9765
♦42
♣QT75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 1N S -2 ♠8 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Gift-Claussen
150 2.00 1.00 2♦ E +3 ♠A 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦4 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣Q 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
7 |
♠T86
♥A865
♦KQ3
♣876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♥9 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
120 2.00 1.00 2N S ♥2 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♣2 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Gift-Claussen
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♣2 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
8 |
♠JT6
♥Q76
♦T976
♣986
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠J 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦T 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦K 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Gift-Claussen
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♣6 1-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
9 |
♠AQ75
♥-
♦AKQ82
♣AQT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 7♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.83 0.17 4♠ N +3 ♥3 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Gift-Claussen
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
150 0.17 2.83 4♦ N +1 ♥J 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
10 |
♠KQ
♥T94
♦AQJ9
♣KQJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.83 0.17 3N N +1 ♦3 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Gift-Claussen
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣8 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +3 ♦5 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
11 |
♠9
♥QJ75
♦QJ8532
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ W -2 ♣A 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 2.17 0.83 5♣ E -2 ♦4 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Gift-Claussen
50 0.17 2.83 4♠ W -1 ♥Q 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
12 |
♠32
♥K863
♦AT7
♣K752
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 3N S ♥2 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Gift-Claussen
120 1.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♠4 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.17 2.83 3N S -2 ♥2 1-Gunter-Albright vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
13 |
♠2
♥87543
♦A86
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♦2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
300 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -3 ♥A 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
200 1.00 2.00 3N W -2 ♣2 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.00 3.00 1♠ S -1 ♥K 3-Gift-Claussen vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
14 |
♠7
♥QJ762
♦KQ63
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♠A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♠A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ E -2 ♠2 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♦2 3-Gift-Claussen vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
15 |
♠QT43
♥76
♦873
♣KJ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♥5/4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♦Q 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ E -2 ♠2 3-Gift-Claussen vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
50 1.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥A 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣7 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
16 |
♠8763
♥KQ76
♦83
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣8 3-Gift-Claussen vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Gunter-Albright
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N ♠Q 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣6 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
17 |
♠953
♥84
♦KT987
♣T87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♥ 2/-♠ 1NT ♦6 ♠8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♥ E -1 ♣A 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ E ♣A 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
500 0.17 2.83 2♥* N -3 ♠Q 3-Gift-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
18 |
♠98
♥Q973
♦QT642
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 2N W -1 ♥3 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
50 2.17 0.83 2N W -1 ♥3 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
120 0.17 2.83 1N W +1 ♦4 3-Gift-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
19 |
♠T62
♥QJ73
♦A43
♣752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 2NT ♥5/4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 2N E -3 ♥4 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♥3 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
130 0.17 2.83 3♦ E +1 ♠A 3-Gift-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
20 |
♠K4
♥KT853
♦A9842
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ ♣3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3NT ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 5♣ W -2 ♠K 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ N ♣T 3-Gift-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.17 2.83 5♣ W -1 ♦A 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 5-Smith-Feldstein
|
21 |
♠AQ4
♥653
♦KJ42
♣K97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ S +2 ♦T 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ W ♥6 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
22 |
♠965
♥A7
♦K853
♣K863
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.83 0.17 Pass Out 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
100 0.83 2.17 2♥ S -2 ♠K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.83 2.17 2♥ S -2 ♠K 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
23 |
♠KT2
♥62
♦K7543
♣J43
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♠ S +1 ♦6 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.17 2.83 3♠ S -1 ♣T 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
|
24 |
♠KQ
♥AJ83
♦AKJ85
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5/4♥ 4/2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.83 0.17 3N N +1 ♣4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
420 0.83 2.17 4♥ N ♠A 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Gunter-Albright
420 0.83 2.17 4♥ N ♦9 8-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Nelson-Cowen
|
25 |
♠Q5
♥AKT83
♦9643
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.17 0.83 4♠ E +1 ♥2 3-Gift-Claussen vs 1-Gunter-Albright
650 2.17 0.83 4♠ E +1 ♥2 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
680 0.17 2.83 4♠ E +2 ♣9 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
26 |
♠KT742
♥5
♦T5
♣KT974
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 4NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -1 ♦2 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ E +2 ♦2 3-Gift-Claussen vs 1-Gunter-Albright
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ E ♠J 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
27 |
♠A986
♥JT65
♦8
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣J 3-Gift-Claussen vs 1-Gunter-Albright
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣7 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣6 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
28 |
♠Q9852
♥J6
♦KQ72
♣T3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.17 0.83 3N W +2 ♠5 3-Gift-Claussen vs 1-Gunter-Albright
460 2.17 0.83 3N W +2 ♠2 5-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
490 0.17 2.83 3N W +3 ♦2 6-Nelson-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|