1 |
♠AK
♥K54
♦AJT752
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -3 ♠A 6-Winham-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
70 3.00 1.00 1♦ N ♠Q 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Harken-Burk
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Burke-Loops
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♠A 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 0.00 4.00 2N E +1 ♦8 3-Keen-Dean vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠A2
♥986
♦AQT
♣KJ976
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3/4 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♣ N +2 ♠7 6-Winham-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♥4 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ W ♠A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 3.00 2♣ N -1 ♥K 3-Keen-Dean vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -2 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Burke-Loops
|
3 |
♠Q98432
♥A976
♦K4
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♠4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Harken-Burk
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣5 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♦5 6-Winham-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Burke-Loops
720 0.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♠4 3-Keen-Dean vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
4 |
♠AK2
♥42
♦K7653
♣Q82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N N +1 ♠5 6-Winham-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ S ♣A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Harken-Burk
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ W ♠A 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ W ♥4 3-Keen-Dean vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠AJ643
♥73
♦A854
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠0 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.50 0.50 5♠ N +2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
710 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +3 ♣5 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Cowen-Brown
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♦K 6-Winham-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♣5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♦J 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 6-Burke-Loops
|
6 |
♠6
♥T7543
♦762
♣KJ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 2/3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 6N E -1 ♠4 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 6-Burke-Loops
100 3.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♠6 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Cowen-Brown
100 3.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♥7 6-Winham-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ W ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
7 |
♠AK94
♥743
♦K542
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♠3 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 6-Burke-Loops
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦A 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Cowen-Brown
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣5 6-Winham-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠QJ96
♥J543
♦KT8
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♥A 6-Winham-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♥A 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 2-Cowen-Brown
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♥A 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 6-Burke-Loops
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♥A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
9 |
♠KQ642
♥J2
♦Q762
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♣J 3-Keen-Dean vs 3-Harken-Burk
50 2.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♠7 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
50 2.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♣6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Burke-Loops
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♦3 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.50 3.50 2N S -2 ♥7 6-Winham-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Brown
|
10 |
♠J94
♥Q8653
♦K2
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3/4♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦4/5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 5♥ S ♦5 3-Keen-Dean vs 3-Harken-Burk
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♥7 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦A 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Burke-Loops
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ S ♣7 6-Winham-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Brown
|
11 |
♠KQT98
♥Q42
♦Q73
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♠2 6-Winham-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Brown
50 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♥J 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♣A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Burke-Loops
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♣2 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.00 4.00 2N E +1 ♥7 3-Keen-Dean vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
12 |
♠AK72
♥KQJ98
♦T93
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠6 6-Winham-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Brown
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♥3 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠4 3-Keen-Dean vs 3-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦4 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Burke-Loops
|
13 |
♠2
♥KJT932
♦AT72
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♠ E -1 ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♠6 6-Winham-Tainty vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥J 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 3-Harken-Burk
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥J 3-Keen-Dean vs 2-Cowen-Brown
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣T 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Burke-Loops
|
14 |
♠JT875
♥QJ73
♦6
♣764
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5/4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5/4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♣A 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 3-Harken-Burk
130 3.50 0.50 1♦ S +3 ♣A 3-Keen-Dean vs 2-Cowen-Brown
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♣A 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Burke-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣A 6-Winham-Tainty vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
15 |
♠A5
♥A93
♦972
♣T9752
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3/2 ♦3/2 ♥6/5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♠8 3-Keen-Dean vs 2-Cowen-Brown
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ S +1 ♠Q 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Burke-Loops
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 ♠8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
120 1.00 3.00 2N N ♠6 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 3-Harken-Burk
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♥2 6-Winham-Tainty vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
|
16 |
♠KQJ2
♥4
♦KT975
♣K64
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ S ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥J 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 6-Burke-Loops
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥J 3-Keen-Dean vs 2-Cowen-Brown
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥2 6-Winham-Tainty vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
430 0.00 4.00 3N N +1 ♣7 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
17 |
♠J742
♥K86
♦A3
♣KJ64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4/2NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥T 3-Keen-Dean vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥T 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦J 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥T 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 2-Cowen-Brown
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
18 |
♠964
♥AT854
♦T9752
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 7♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥0 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +3 ♠8 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 2-Cowen-Brown
710 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +3 ♣Q 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ S +2 ♣7 3-Keen-Dean vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♠8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♥7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
19 |
♠J3
♥652
♦7654
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4/3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♣J 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 3.00 1.00 1♠ W +1 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Harken-Burk
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ E ♣J 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ E +1 ♣J 3-Keen-Dean vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
150 0.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♦4 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 2-Cowen-Brown
|
20 |
♠QT6
♥Q753
♦72
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♦ 1♠ ♣5/6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♥8 3-Keen-Dean vs 1-Wesolowski-Osborn
90 2.50 1.50 1N W ♥8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Harken-Burk
90 2.50 1.50 1N E ♥8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♣3 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 ♦K 1-Gunter-Dioszegi vs 2-Cowen-Brown
|
21 |
♠T9
♥AT9
♦KJ6
♣KJT86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥2 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Harken-Burk
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♣8 6-Winham-Tainty vs 6-Burke-Loops
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ W ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Brown
110 0.50 3.50 1♠ W +1 ♣J 3-Keen-Dean vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
22 |
♠K532
♥AK6
♦AJ5
♣T72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2N W -1 ♠2 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Harken-Burk
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ W +1 ♥A 3-Keen-Dean vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Brown
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♠2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
180 0.00 4.00 1N W +3 ♣T 6-Winham-Tainty vs 6-Burke-Loops
|
23 |
♠KJ32
♥-
♦AKQT
♣QJ943
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♠ 3/1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Brown
100 3.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♠9 6-Winham-Tainty vs 6-Burke-Loops
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦2 3-Keen-Dean vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠9 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♦2 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
24 |
♠K86
♥AT8
♦Q94
♣QJ64
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2♦* S ♥7 2-Forest-Nathanson vs 3-Harken-Burk
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♥7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +2 ♦J 6-Winham-Tainty vs 6-Burke-Loops
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♥7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Brown
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -3 ♥3 3-Keen-Dean vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|