1 |
♠J943
♥T932
♦984
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 2♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N W +3 ♠J 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
520 2.00 2.00 3N W +4 ♠3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Gift-Gunter
520 2.00 2.00 3N W +4 ♥2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Loops-Osborn
520 2.00 2.00 3N W +4 ♥2 6-Smith-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
1020 0.00 4.00 6N W +1 ♥T 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
2 |
♠2
♥AQ653
♦AQJT9
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N S ♥2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Gift-Gunter
600 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠Q 6-Smith-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♠K 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣8 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Zinman-Chase
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -1 ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Loops-Osborn
|
3 |
♠652
♥QJT983
♦7
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N E ♥K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Gift-Gunter
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ W ♥Q 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ W +1 ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Loops-Osborn
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♠K 6-Smith-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♥K 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
4 |
♠A
♥AKQJ85
♦6
♣98764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/4♥ 2/3NT ♦5/6 ♠2/3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♠* W -2 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Loops-Osborn
200 3.00 1.00 5♠ W -2 ♥A 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Zinman-Chase
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Gift-Gunter
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Smith-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -1 ♠J 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
|
5 |
♠QT4
♥J52
♦QJ75
♣J65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Loops-Osborn
80 3.00 1.00 1♥ E ♦A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Gift-Gunter
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ E ♦A 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ E +1 ♦A 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Zinman-Chase
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ E +1 ♦A 6-Smith-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
6 |
♠KQJ87543
♥J
♦32
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣0 ♦4 ♥3 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ N -1 ♣7 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Gift-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 4♣ W +2 ♠K 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Loops-Osborn
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ W +2 ♥J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Chase
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ W +2 ♥J 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ W +2 ♥J 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠75
♥2
♦QJT982
♣AT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 2♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ W ♦Q 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Gift-Gunter
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♠7 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Chase
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♦Q 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Loops-Osborn
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠7 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
|
8 |
♠AT
♥JT8
♦Q8752
♣A43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 1/2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠3 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Gift-Gunter
180 3.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♠9 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
150 1.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♣5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
150 1.00 3.00 2N N +1 ♠3 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Loops-Osborn
150 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -3 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
9 |
♠72
♥AQJ4
♦AK83
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣7/6 ♠5 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠K 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Gift-Gunter
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠J 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Loops-Osborn
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥5 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
180 1.00 3.00 2N S +2 ♠K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +1 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
10 |
♠K73
♥J2
♦984
♣KQ643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4/3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣K 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Gift-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♠9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Zinman-Chase
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣8 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣8 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Loops-Osborn
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
|
11 |
♠AQ94
♥6
♦Q943
♣AK84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 4.00 0.00 6♠ S ♥J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥7 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S ♥J 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Loops-Osborn
120 0.00 4.00 1N N +1 ♠J 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
12 |
♠AK76
♥T85
♦T865
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N S ♠2 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Loops-Osborn
100 3.00 1.00 1♠ W -2 ♣K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
90 1.50 2.50 1N S ♦9 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
90 1.50 2.50 1N N ♠J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♣A 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
13 |
♠8
♥A93
♦QT983
♣AK53
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥3 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣A 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W ♣A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Loops-Osborn
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♣A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
680 0.00 4.00 5♠ E +1 ♦8 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
14 |
♠2
♥Q98642
♦J9
♣AQJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 1.50 5♠ E +1 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 2.50 1.50 5♠ E +1 ♥A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
480 2.50 1.50 5♠ E +1 ♦6 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Zinman-Chase
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♦8 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
500 0.00 4.00 6♥* N -3 ♦A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Loops-Osborn
|
15 |
♠AJ7653
♥T5
♦64
♣J32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Loops-Osborn
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦6 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
800 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -3 ♦A 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
16 |
♠83
♥AK98
♦964
♣Q653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠7 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 4-Gift-Gunter
430 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♠7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
430 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♠7 6-Smith-Smith vs 1-Loops-Osborn
400 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -4 ♦T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♣8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
17 |
♠AK54
♥Q84
♦K5
♣AKJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3/4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 4-Gift-Gunter
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦7 6-Smith-Smith vs 1-Loops-Osborn
400 1.00 3.00 3N N ♣8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Zinman-Chase
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
|
18 |
♠AJT83
♥74
♦A983
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Zinman-Chase
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ W +1 ♥7 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 4-Gift-Gunter
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 ♦3 6-Smith-Smith vs 1-Loops-Osborn
300 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -3 ♦J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
|
19 |
♠Q
♥KJ872
♦KJ7652
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 2♦* E -2 ♥T 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 4-Gift-Gunter
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S ♣5 6-Smith-Smith vs 1-Loops-Osborn
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Zinman-Chase
|
20 |
♠A64
♥Q9872
♦853
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
230 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +4 ♠K 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 4-Gift-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♠K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Zinman-Chase
140 1.00 3.00 1♠ E +2 ♦2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♠T 6-Smith-Smith vs 1-Loops-Osborn
|
21 |
♠KJ985
♥Q875
♦Q
♣T62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -2 ♣Q 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 3.50 0.50 1♦* E -1 ♠Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Gift-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2♦ E -1 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
50 1.50 2.50 2♦ E -1 ♠Q 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
70 0.00 4.00 1♦ E ♥J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Loops-Osborn
|
22 |
♠9752
♥QT97
♦A6
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠J 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♦3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Gift-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +2 ♦9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Loops-Osborn
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S ♠J 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♠J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
|
23 |
♠AKT86
♥A7
♦AJT6
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Gift-Gunter
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥7 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ N +2 ♣9 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Loops-Osborn
|
24 |
♠KT42
♥AJT83
♦4
♣J93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣7 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♥9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Loops-Osborn
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣7 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦6 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Gift-Gunter
|
25 |
♠984
♥53
♦QT8
♣Q8765
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♠3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Loops-Osborn
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♠3 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♣8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣J 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Gift-Gunter
|
26 |
♠J2
♥543
♦976
♣KQT84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N E ♠4 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Gift-Gunter
600 2.50 1.50 3N W ♣K 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
600 2.50 1.50 3N E ♠4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♦5 6-Smith-Smith vs 6-Zinman-Chase
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
|
27 |
♠94
♥Q93
♦AQT543
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥8 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♦5 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♥8 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Gift-Gunter
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♥3 6-Smith-Smith vs 6-Zinman-Chase
460 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♦A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
28 |
♠8
♥T84
♦K9642
♣J742
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♥8 6-Smith-Smith vs 6-Zinman-Chase
50 3.50 0.50 4♣ W -1 ♥4 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Gift-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦Q 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♣9 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♥8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
29 |
♠7542
♥AT94
♦K2
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠Q 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W ♠3 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Gift-Gunter
180 2.00 2.00 2N E +2 ♠Q 6-Smith-Smith vs 6-Zinman-Chase
630 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
660 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♦7 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
|
30 |
♠QT84
♥KJ985
♦A2
♣K3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 6-Smith-Smith vs 6-Zinman-Chase
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♥K 4-Maggipinto-Walker vs 2-Simpson-Nelson
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♦K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Avenmarg-Millslagle
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♦2 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Gift-Gunter
|