1 |
♠T85
♥3
♦J7652
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +3 ♣5 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Keen
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♦7 4-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Brown
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣5 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠QT4
♥AQ5
♦J3
♣K8743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ -/2♠ 1NT ♠6/8 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥6 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♠9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Keen
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♥5 4-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♥J 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -2 ♠7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
3 |
♠AQ863
♥KJ753
♦73
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 2♦ 2♥ -/1♠ 4/5NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♦7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♠6 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Keen
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Brown
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♥5 4-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
4 |
♠JT94
♥KJ5
♦Q74
♣542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠J 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Brown
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣K 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♠J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Davidson-Keen
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠J 4-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
5 |
♠A
♥AJT2
♦T85
♣Q9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S ♦A 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Cowen-Brown
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦T 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Davidson-Keen
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
90 1.00 3.00 1N W ♦5 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
6 |
♠K54
♥Q87
♦AT963
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣K 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
120 1.00 3.00 2N S ♣K 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Cowen-Brown
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♣K 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Davidson-Keen
|
7 |
♠K8
♥KQ6
♦K43
♣QJ962
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥T 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥4 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Davidson-Keen
600 1.00 3.00 3N N ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S +3 ♥5 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
8 |
♠74
♥AT984
♦A42
♣732
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦7 4-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Davidson-Keen
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
9 |
♠942
♥AQ8752
♦AK
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 3♥ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥2/4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♠5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♠5 4-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Davidson-Keen
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠8 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Cowen-Brown
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♦A 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
10 |
♠AT854
♥K7
♦8543
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦0 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♠ 6NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 4♣ E +2 ♦Q 4-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
600 3.00 1.00 5♦ W ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Davidson-Keen
620 1.50 2.50 5♣ E +1 ♦Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.50 2.50 5♣ E +1 ♦5 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Cowen-Brown
640 0.00 4.00 5♣ E +2 ♥Q 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
11 |
♠A9
♥J642
♦T87654
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 5♠* W -1 ♣6 4-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Davidson-Keen
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 ♣6 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +2 ♣6 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
12 |
♠A842
♥AK53
♦T9
♣T74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 ♥Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Davidson-Keen
680 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♥J 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Cowen-Brown
260 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +5 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +3 ♥2 4-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ S +2 ♥4 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
13 |
♠Q642
♥Q74
♦AK3
♣Q82
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 3/5NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 5♠ S +1 ♦4 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Brown
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦9 4-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ S ♦4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S +3 ♦9 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Davidson-Keen
|
14 |
♠Q3
♥K5
♦JT87
♣QJT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 ♣Q 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ S ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Brown
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ S ♠A 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Davidson-Keen
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +1 ♠K 4-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AJ93
♥J75
♦J84
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2/1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ S +2 ♥2 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Brown
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠5 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Davidson-Keen
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E ♣2 4-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠A986
♥J43
♦96
♣QT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Brown
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Davidson-Keen
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ S +2 ♣A 4-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ S ♣K 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
|
17 |
♠AT85
♥A6
♦K853
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣3 4-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Brown
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♣7 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Davidson-Keen
50 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ W ♥6 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -2 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠K972
♥Q4
♦QJ7
♣AT92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W ♠2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♦7 4-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Brown
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Davidson-Keen
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♦3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥7 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
19 |
♠632
♥JT52
♦AT
♣J543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♥A 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Davidson-Keen
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ W ♣3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♣A 4-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Brown
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♥3 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
20 |
♠JT765
♥6
♦JT5
♣A976
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥2 5-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ E ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Nathanson-Forest
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦6 3-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Davidson-Keen
600 0.50 3.50 3N W ♠6 4-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Cowen-Brown
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|