1 |
♠82
♥KQJ65
♦T84
♣K72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Keen-Cowen
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W ♥K 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥K 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Burtch-Harken
|
2 |
♠J82
♥-
♦Q8632
♣AQT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E ♦2 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Burtch-Harken
140 1.50 0.50 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Keen-Cowen
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♥K 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
3 |
♠8
♥A9743
♦AKT97
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦4 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Burtch-Harken
110 1.00 1.00 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Keen-Cowen
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥8 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
4 |
♠AKT84
♥T7
♦AK7
♣965
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.75 0.25 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Keen-Cowen
200 0.25 1.75 3♠ N -2 ♥A 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
5 |
♠AT6
♥KT5
♦KT
♣AKT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣1/2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Burtch-Harken
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
600 0.00 2.00 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Keen-Cowen
|
6 |
♠943
♥A95
♦9
♣AT8542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠A 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 2-Burtch-Harken
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠K 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Cowen
120 0.00 2.00 2N S ♥4 1-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
|
7 |
♠AQJT7
♥T
♦T87
♣J982
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♠ 1NT ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥3 |
EW: 2/3♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♥7 1-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣5 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Cowen
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♦8 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 2-Burtch-Harken
|
8 |
♠42
♥QJT876
♦8
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
880 2.00 0.00 4♥** N ♣A 1-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣6 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 2-Burtch-Harken
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♣A 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Cowen
|
9 |
♠Q52
♥T6
♦K96
♣AK432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2/1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Cowen
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♣5 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 2-Burtch-Harken
|
10 |
♠92
♥832
♦6542
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♦7/6 ♥5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥2 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Keen-Cowen
100 0.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♠7 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 2-Burtch-Harken
100 0.50 1.50 1-Avenmarg-Smith vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
|
11 |
♠QT4
♥KQ92
♦K87
♣K62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 2N E +1 ♣7 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
150 1.50 0.50 1♣ N -3 ♠A 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 3-Keen-Cowen
210 0.00 2.00 2-Burtch-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
12 |
♠KT76
♥32
♦Q6
♣86543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2-Burtch-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ W ♥3 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 3-Keen-Cowen
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ E ♦2 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
|
13 |
♠T94
♥J3
♦QT65
♣KT82
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3/4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N E ♥4 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 3-Keen-Cowen
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥3 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
630 0.50 1.50 2-Burtch-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
14 |
♠J74
♥A
♦K9642
♣T962
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N W ♦4 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 3-Keen-Cowen
420 1.00 1.00 2-Burtch-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♦4 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
|
15 |
♠AQ64
♥J73
♦K64
♣T92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N W -6 ♦3 5-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
50 1.00 1.00 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 3-Keen-Cowen
130 0.00 2.00 2-Burtch-Harken vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
16 |
♠KT96
♥752
♦K87
♣JT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♣5 2-Burtch-Harken vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♣5 3-Keen-Cowen vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
17 |
♠AKT3
♥AJ52
♦Q2
♣AK8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥K 3-Keen-Cowen vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
460 1.50 0.50 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 4-Harken-Burk
400 0.00 2.00 3N N ♥4 2-Burtch-Harken vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
|
18 |
♠32
♥542
♦KT32
♣Q875
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣A 2-Burtch-Harken vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
50 1.00 1.00 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 4-Harken-Burk
300 0.00 2.00 1N S -3 ♥3 3-Keen-Cowen vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
19 |
♠QT543
♥JT8543
♦-
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠2 2-Burtch-Harken vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
450 1.50 0.50 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 4-Harken-Burk
50 0.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♣J 3-Keen-Cowen vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|
20 |
♠QJ7
♥K984
♦Q8764
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 6-Smith-Wesolowski vs 4-Harken-Burk
720 0.50 1.50 3N E +4 ♦J 2-Burtch-Harken vs 5-Sterling-Llacera
720 0.50 1.50 3N E +4 ♦J 3-Keen-Cowen vs 1-Avenmarg-Smith
|