1 |
♠72
♥K98754
♦KT6
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 3.50 0.50 6♦ E -1 ♥A 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 5♥ S -2 ♠4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Johnson-Loops
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♥4 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♥K 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Duey-Ford
|
2 |
♠T42
♥973
♦9653
♣753
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 5♥ W +1 ♣5 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 6-Smith-Smith
490 3.00 1.00 3N W +3 ♠T 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Johnson-Loops
990 1.00 3.00 6N W ♥9 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Duey-Ford
990 1.00 3.00 6N W ♦3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
990 1.00 3.00 6N W ♣3 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
3 |
♠T65
♥J
♦JT732
♣Q853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♠5 NT7/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♣ N -1 ♥2 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Duey-Ford
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦A 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♦A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♦A 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 6-Smith-Smith
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
4 |
♠J63
♥AQ32
♦QT87
♣T8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 2♥ S +2 ♠9 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠9 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 0.13 3.88 3♣ E +1 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
5 |
♠T932
♥J642
♦54
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ E ♠K 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 5-Duey-Ford
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♠6 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 6-Smith-Smith
150 1.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♠2 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
150 1.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♥2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -3 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
6 |
♠A9642
♥KT42
♦T
♣863
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -6 ♣8 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 5-Duey-Ford
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♥5 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Loops
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♦7 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 1N S -2 ♦7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
150 0.00 4.00 2N E +1 ♦3 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠3
♥K84
♦KJ852
♣J985
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6/5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Smith-Smith
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠Q 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ W -2 ♦8 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 5-Duey-Ford
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ E -2 ♦A 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
8 |
♠AT
♥AKT972
♦A82
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 2♦ 5♥ 7NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣0 ♦4 ♥2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
940 4.00 0.00 6♣ S +1 ♠2 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 5-Duey-Ford
650 3.00 1.00 5♥* N ♠3 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Smith-Smith
450 1.50 2.50 5♥ N ♠6 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 ♣6 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Loops
440 0.00 4.00 5♣ N +2 ♠3 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
9 |
♠9
♥J4
♦QJ43
♣QT7543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
570 4.00 0.00 3♦* S +1 ♠J 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 3.00 1.00 1♥ E -2 ♠K 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Loops
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ S ♣8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♣5 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦A 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 5-Duey-Ford
|
10 |
♠942
♥8
♦AJ93
♣QJ874
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.67 0.33 3♣ N +1 ♠Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
AVE- NP 1.60 0.00 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Loops
100 1.17 2.83 4♠ W -1 ♣Q 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.17 2.83 3♠ W -1 ♥8 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠754
♥AKQJ5
♦K9
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 NT6/3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N ♥3 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Smith-Smith
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♠8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ N ♠8 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♣3 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Duey-Ford
150 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♦A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
12 |
♠AKJ
♥AJ984
♦AT52
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 7♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 4.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♣T 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Smith-Smith
1370 2.50 1.50 6♦ N ♠2 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
1370 2.50 1.50 6♦ N ♣T 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Duey-Ford
660 0.50 3.50 3N S +2 ♠9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
660 0.50 3.50 3N S +2 ♦4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
13 |
♠A4
♥9742
♦Q6532
♣T5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠3 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠Q 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Duey-Ford
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♥K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
14 |
♠82
♥AKQJ74
♦QT5
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Duey-Ford
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Smith-Smith
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥K 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|
15 |
♠864
♥KT86
♦KQ9
♣T82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♣A 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Smith-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Duey-Ford
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣A 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 1.00 3.00 5♥ S -1 ♣A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
530 0.00 4.00 3♠* W ♦9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠K64
♥J8
♦JT82
♣T982
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N W ♣T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
600 3.50 0.50 3N W ♣T 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦2 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣T 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Johnson-Loops
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♣T 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
17 |
♠AT65
♥K73
♦K63
♣JT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 ♣5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♠9 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Johnson-Loops
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣5 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣5 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 ♣K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠T3
♥-
♦KJ8652
♣AK632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3/4 ♦3/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♥K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 2.50 1.50 5♦ N -1 ♥8 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 2.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 ♣8 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Johnson-Loops
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♣K 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -1 ♣8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
19 |
♠62
♥AQ6
♦AQ983
♣K83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣5/4 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♠8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♠8 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -2 ♠8 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♠2 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
20 |
♠Q762
♥KT97
♦T
♣AQ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ -/1NT ♥5 ♠5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦* W -1 ♦T 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 1-Johnson-Loops
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♦A 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +1 ♠3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 ♣9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
21 |
♠J9752
♥J
♦AJ43
♣AK3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣6 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Duey-Ford
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣Q 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣Q 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -2 ♦2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
22 |
♠J73
♥AKQ8
♦A
♣AQT92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -2 ♥5 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Duey-Ford
90 3.00 1.00 1♣ N +1 ♦4 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♦4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 1.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 ♣3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♠K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|
23 |
♠QT875
♥K5
♦9854
♣82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ ♣2/3 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦K 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Duey-Ford
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦K 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
|
24 |
♠T5
♥QJ87
♦QT982
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♦T 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Duey-Ford
50 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 ♦8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
50 0.00 4.00 2♣ S -1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|
25 |
♠QT65
♥K9
♦T953
♣JT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣3 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♠5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Loops
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♦Q 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Duey-Ford
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥2 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
26 |
♠KJ9
♥QJT
♦72
♣T9632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦4/3 ♥4 ♠6/4 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♥2 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♣5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Duey-Ford
150 2.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♠5 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣5 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
27 |
♠9875
♥AK64
♦A73
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♥9 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ S -2 ♠T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ W ♥A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Duey-Ford
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ W ♥K 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♠9 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
28 |
♠T76
♥AQ632
♦KT2
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♠J 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♠8 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠J 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Duey-Ford
|
29 |
♠862
♥J83
♦J74
♣QT86
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Duey-Ford
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♥3 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♥9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
180 1.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♥J 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 6-Smith-Smith
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥J 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
30 |
♠AQ84
♥Q3
♦A53
♣AK53
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥5 4-Millslagle-Osborn vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S ♥4 5-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♥4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Duey-Ford
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥5 6-Hasey-Cooper vs 6-Smith-Smith
|