1 |
♠Q8753
♥AJ6
♦KJ
♣754
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 0.00 Pass Out 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Cooper
50 2.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♦3 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
100 0.50 2.50 2♦ N -2 ♣Q 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
100 0.50 2.50 3♣ S -2 ♥T 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
|
2 |
♠A86532
♥T
♦9432
♣KJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♠5 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♠J 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦6 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣2 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Cooper
|
3 |
♠AJ6
♥9875
♦AK
♣KQ42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1700 3.00 0.00 7♦* W -6 ♦A 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Cooper
980 1.50 1.50 6♥ S ♠7 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
980 1.50 1.50 6♥ S ♣A 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
490 0.00 3.00 4N N +2 ♦T 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
4 |
♠Q8542
♥-
♦T9875
♣532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦T 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Cooper
600 2.00 1.00 3N E ♥Q 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
660 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♥Q 4-Smith-Smith vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
660 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♥Q 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
5 |
♠9
♥T762
♦KT652
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5/4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2/1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠9 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ E ♣8 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 3-Grant-Cooper
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦4 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Smith-Smith
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♠5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
|
6 |
♠Q74
♥AKT
♦JT94
♣J84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2/1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Smith-Smith
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦A 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ S +2 ♦A 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 3-Grant-Cooper
|
7 |
♠8
♥K4
♦Q8732
♣QT652
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 3.00 0.00 2♠* S ♣9 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S ♣4 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 3-Grant-Cooper
150 1.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♠7 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
500 0.00 3.00 3♠* S -2 ♣4 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
8 |
♠AJT65
♥7
♦T9
♣87543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2/1NT ♣3 ♦3 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♥7 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
50 2.00 1.00 4♦ S -1 ♥K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♥A 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 3-Grant-Cooper
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♦T 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
9 |
♠T9872
♥Q
♦KQJ98
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 3♠ W -1 ♥Q 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 2.17 0.83 4♥ W -1 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Grant-Cooper
140 0.17 2.83 3♥ W ♦K 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
10 |
♠J93
♥J876
♦J972
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 5♣ E ♦3 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Grant-Cooper
690 0.83 2.17 3N E +3 ♠2 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Smith-Smith
690 0.83 2.17 3N E +3 ♥2 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
11 |
♠K
♥AK2
♦KJ92
♣QT632
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 3NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
50 1.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 ♦5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Grant-Cooper
150 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -3 ♠T 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
12 |
♠875
♥K2
♦87
♣A86532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ S ♦T 1-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ S ♣K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Grant-Cooper
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♠4 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
13 |
♠K72
♥Q964
♦43
♣KQ53
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 ♣K 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
200 2.00 1.00 1♥ W -2 ♦4 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Smith
120 1.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥J 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♥A 3-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
14 |
♠QT93
♥93
♦KT62
♣Q53
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ E +1 ♠5 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♦A 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♣4 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Smith
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♣A 3-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
15 |
♠QT92
♥KQT
♦AQ983
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣3 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♠5 3-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N ♣8 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 1.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♥6 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣7 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
16 |
♠A8764
♥62
♦K843
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S ♣7 3-Grant-Cooper vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♣5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Smith-Smith
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♣3 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ S ♠2 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
17 |
♠K85
♥KJT
♦J72
♣AJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.83 0.17 3N N +2 ♥4 3-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥4 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Harken-Burk
130 0.17 2.83 2♣ N +2 ♠8 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
|
18 |
♠KQT983
♥963
♦T
♣A62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♦ E +2 ♠6 3-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ E ♠2 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
420 0.17 2.83 4♥ W ♦T 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
19 |
♠743
♥KJ42
♦5
♣AJT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ E +1 ♥5 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Harken-Burk
200 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -4 ♠K 3-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
620 0.17 2.83 4♠ W ♦5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
|
20 |
♠KQ
♥K63
♦AQ52
♣QJ63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2/3♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 1N N +2 ♠5 3-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
120 1.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♠5 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell
90 0.17 2.83 1N N ♠5 4-Smith-Smith vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
21 |
♠K
♥JT985
♦Q76
♣KT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3/2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 4♠ 1NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♠ W -3 ♥J 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Burk
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +1 ♥7 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
130 0.17 2.83 2♦ E +2 ♣5 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
22 |
♠T
♥QJ97
♦J94
♣AQ963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ E ♦A 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Burk
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ E ♦A 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ E ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
23 |
♠KT7
♥AJ7
♦KQ4
♣T654
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥4/3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.83 0.17 3N N +2 ♥K 2-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Burk
630 0.83 2.17 3N N +1 ♥K 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
630 0.83 2.17 3N N +1 ♥K 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
24 |
♠T
♥KQ873
♦T74
♣K972
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥6 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.80 1.80 4♥ S -4 ♦3 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
200 1.80 1.80 4♥ N -4 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
25 |
♠K9875
♥5
♦AKJ65
♣J2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.83 0.17 3N S +2 ♣9 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
400 1.50 1.50 3N S ♥9 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 0.17 2.83 5♦ N -2 ♣6 3-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
26 |
♠QJ863
♥3
♦KT76
♣T96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♠Q 3-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
200 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♥3 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
200 1.50 1.50 2N W -2 ♥3 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
|
27 |
♠T84
♥A432
♦6
♣AQ543
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.17 0.83 2♦ E +2 ♣K 3-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
130 2.17 0.83 2♦ E +2 ♣K 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
150 0.17 2.83 3♥ N -3 ♦A 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
|
28 |
♠Q432
♥T5
♦AQ4
♣QJ75
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦4 ♠5 NT7/5 |
EW: 3/2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.83 0.17 1♠ W ♥T 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Maggipinto-Walker
90 0.83 2.17 1N E ♥4 3-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Avenmarg-Suddards
90 0.83 2.17 1N E ♣3 5-Oppenheimer-Goodell vs 4-Smith-Smith
|