1 |
♠KJ9
♥J82
♦52
♣K9864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠A 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦3 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ S ♥7 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
2 |
♠Q75
♥K432
♦AJT8
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♥A 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
150 1.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♥A 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♠J 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
|
3 |
♠T94
♥K87542
♦-
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ N -1 ♠J 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ N -1 ♠J 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
4 |
♠972
♥JT2
♦943
♣QJ75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5/4♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♣6 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
600 1.00 1.00 3N W ♠7 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♥4 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
5 |
♠-
♥QJT
♦A874
♣T98654
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2/1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♥Q 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥Q 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
6 |
♠K
♥J83
♦AK87
♣QJT53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠1 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 5♣ N -1 ♦6 2-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥K 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
650 0.00 2.00 5♠ E ♥K 6-Smith-Brown vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
|
7 |
♠94
♥AQJ9
♦652
♣K832
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ E +2 ♠J 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
710 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +3 ♦5 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
710 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +3 ♦2 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
8 |
♠AJ73
♥A7642
♦J
♣J72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ -/1♠ ♣3 ♠5/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ E +1 ♥J 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ E +1 ♥J 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
400 0.00 2.00 5♦ E ♣K 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
9 |
♠A8
♥K85
♦Q8763
♣985
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 3N S ♠4 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
400 1.50 0.50 3N S ♠4 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♥3 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
10 |
♠97532
♥Q76
♦2
♣J653
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♠3 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
660 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠3 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
660 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♣3 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
|
11 |
♠AJ5
♥QT973
♦862
♣32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3/2 ♦4 ♠6 NT5/3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥4 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E ♥K 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
12 |
♠Q75
♥T765
♦Q952
♣T5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1/2♦ ♣6/7 ♥4 ♠2 NT2/5 |
EW: 2♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ W ♣T 6-Smith-Brown vs 2-Zinman-Karter
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥5 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦2 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
|
13 |
♠J843
♥2
♦6432
♣Q987
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠3 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠8 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ W +1 ♠3 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
14 |
♠AT5
♥75
♦KQ2
♣QJ763
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♣5 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♣5 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♣5 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
15 |
♠T852
♥T43
♦9
♣QT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 4/2NT ♣6/5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 5♦ E +1 ♠3 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
430 1.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♠3 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
460 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♣3 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
16 |
♠K987
♥QJT9
♦A8
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♣K 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
100 1.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♣K 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
90 0.00 2.00 1N E ♣K 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
17 |
♠42
♥Q874
♦KQT5
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♠4 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 ♣3 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 ♣3 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
18 |
♠AQT8753
♥64
♦96
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5/4♦ 5♥ 1♠ ♣5/4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 6-Smith-Brown vs 3-Harken-Burk
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♣4 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 2-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠AT97
♥JT95
♦J93
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1♠ 1NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N ♠K 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ N ♦3 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥8 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
|
20 |
♠Q7
♥KJ763
♦A987
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/1♣ 3/2♦ 4♥ 4/-NT ♠6/5 NT10/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠J 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣T 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠8 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
21 |
♠T654
♥KQ3
♦K43
♣AKT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 3N N ♥J 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
600 1.50 0.50 3N N ♥J 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
180 0.00 2.00 2N N +2 ♥J 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
|
22 |
♠K2
♥AQ5
♦KJT2
♣Q963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥7 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
490 1.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♥7 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
300 0.00 2.00 2♥ W -3 ♦J 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
23 |
♠J95
♥T63
♦A75
♣A862
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣2 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ E ♣3 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E ♣4 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
|
24 |
♠72
♥AQJT9762
♦82
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Winham vs 3-Harken-Burk
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦A 6-Smith-Brown vs 4-Walker-Faircrest
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦A 5-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 2-Zinman-Karter
|
25 |
♠Q32
♥A8
♦KJ7
♣T9642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.50 0.50 1N W ♣T 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
90 1.50 0.50 1N W ♣4 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♣J 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
26 |
♠A9
♥T93
♦8643
♣Q943
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♦8 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♣5 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
200 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 ♥A 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
27 |
♠A8
♥QT
♦KJT863
♣765
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ W +3 ♣6 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♦J 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♣7 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
|
28 |
♠J93
♥AT854
♦63
♣A86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2/4NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦6 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦6 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
29 |
♠A743
♥AJ96543
♦T
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 5♦ E -3 ♥7 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
100 1.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥7 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣A 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
|
30 |
♠K8742
♥T5
♦QJT64
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♦A 4-Walker-Faircrest vs 1-Avenmarg-Winham
50 0.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♣K 6-Smith-Brown vs 5-Smith-Oppenheimer
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣8 2-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Harken-Burk
|