1 |
♠K74
♥6543
♦QT9
♣T73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.50 0.50 3♠ W +3 ♦Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
230 3.50 0.50 2♠ E +4 ♥K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♦9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +2 ♥K 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
2 |
♠754
♥AQT42
♦A953
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♣ W ♥A 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 3.50 0.50 4♣ W ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +2 ♣9 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
300 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -3 ♠9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
400 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -4 ♠9 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
3 |
♠Q9
♥KT72
♦K32
♣AQ62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N N +2 ♥3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♠A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♦5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦5 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♥3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
4 |
♠K653
♥T2
♦AJ953
♣JT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♠3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦5 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♠3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
5 |
♠T976
♥Q97532
♦J85
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠T 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
400 3.00 1.00 3N W ♥5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
460 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
460 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥5 2-Grant-Cooper vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
460 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
6 |
♠K6
♥AK9
♦J973
♣J864
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♥2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♥2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♥2 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
150 1.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♠T 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠QJ976
♥T54
♦43
♣AT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
680 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠4 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♦K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
230 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +3 ♠4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
|
8 |
♠J9
♥KT5
♦AKQ
♣A9742
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +3 ♦J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♠A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 2.00 2.00 4♠* W -1 ♦A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
200 0.00 4.00 2♦ S -4 ♦2 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
9 |
♠AT643
♥8653
♦AQJ8
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 1.00 5♥ S +1 ♦9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠K 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S ♣3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
|
10 |
♠54
♥AT
♦98652
♣AKJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥2 ♠2 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 5♠ E ♣7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥8 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥8 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♦4 2-Grant-Cooper vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
11 |
♠KQ9762
♥Q4
♦AJ73
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ 3/2♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥7/6 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♣4 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♣4 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♣4 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♣4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
12 |
♠AT953
♥Q8
♦987
♣A93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥9 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♥9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ N -1 ♥9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
13 |
♠T4
♥72
♦J65
♣AKQJ87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣0 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ S +2 ♠J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♣5 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
14 |
♠A53
♥AT98
♦KT96
♣A4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4/5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♥5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♦3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠J 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♣A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♣A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
15 |
♠-
♥AQ2
♦KQT76
♣A7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♣3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
170 2.00 2.00 4♦ N +2 ♠A 2-Grant-Cooper vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
170 2.00 2.00 4♦ N +2 ♥7 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ N +3 ♠A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ N ♥7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
16 |
♠KQT94
♥J9864
♦864
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♥ ♣4/5 ♥6/7 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♦K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♥K 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
17 |
♠J94
♥T6
♦AJ865
♣432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦7 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦2 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
510 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♠2 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
|
18 |
♠7
♥JT965
♦AK652
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
200 0.50 3.50 3N* N -1 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
200 0.50 3.50 2N N -2 ♥6 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
19 |
♠KQ82
♥7
♦T8
♣AK8743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 6♠ 7NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1520 4.00 0.00 7N S ♥2 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣9 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♣J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ S ♥2 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
|
20 |
♠J95
♥AQT4
♦Q7
♣KJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♦3 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♠6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
180 1.00 3.00 1N S +3 ♠6 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
21 |
♠KQJ97
♥AQ76
♦J4
♣A3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥K 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 ♠T 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♠K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♠K 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
22 |
♠86
♥AKQJ7
♦AK5
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 5♥ N +1 ♣9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♠K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ S +1 ♦J 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♦3 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ N +1 ♠K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
23 |
♠K3
♥A8
♦8432
♣KQT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3/-NT ♠5 NT9/6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3/4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦A 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♦A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ N +1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♠4 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣8 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
24 |
♠AK965
♥J953
♦A
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥7 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥2 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♥2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦2 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
25 |
♠Q3
♥AK63
♦K963
♣A98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥Q 2-Grant-Cooper vs 4-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Simpson-Nelson
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥Q 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Wesolowski-McCabe
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥7 5-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Nelson-Davidson
|